Quantcast
Advertisement

BoE release of super choice’s name greeted with mixed reaction

Eduction reformNORWALK, Conn. – The news is only hours old, and already the hounds are baying at the moon.

Special Master for the State of Connecticut Department of Education Steven Adamowski’s name was revealed to the Norwalk populace Friday afternoon, and the search engines shifted into overdrive.

Some readers applauded the choice after reading Adamowski’s resume. He arrives in Norwalk with the reputation as a supporter of education reform. Others had questions after going online and finding stories that do not always paint a flattering picture of the candidate to lead Norwalk’s schools.

Two stories turned up, one by blogger and former state rep Jonathan Pelto, the other by Hearst Connecticut Media columnist Wendy Lecker, that call into question Adamowski’s certification to serve as a Connecticut superintendent. Board of Education Chairman Mike Lyons said the allegations are not true.

“The ‘nonrenewable certification’ that Pelto refers to (which expired on 11/7/07) was replaced by a new certificate issued the day before its expiration (on 11/6/07). That certificate remains in effect. I’ll get a copy of it for you.”

Adamowski responded to a late email and elaborated further:

“Connecticut laws allows ‘highly qualified’ superintendent candidates to receive a waiver of CT requirements (in my case I exceeded the Supt requirements but my CT elementary teaching certificate from the 1970’s had lapsed). There are requirements for this in the statute – you have to hold certification in another state and have at least 15 years experience as a superintendent. I received the waiver from then-Commissioner Mark McQuillan on 11/7/07.”

An informed and engaged public makes the democracy work, so in that vein, we bring you some story links, with a few words of introduction to put them in perspective. The opinions in the blog posts and columns are strictly those of the writers.

The first is from Pelto and was linked in another story’s comment chain by a reader. According to his bio, Pelto “has been actively involved in Connecticut public policy, advocacy and electoral politics for nearly 40 years. In 1984 he was elected to the Connecticut House of Representatives as a senior at the University of Connecticut and, over five terms, rose to the level of Deputy Majority Leader…”

Last fall he made a third-party bid for governor that went nowhere.

The link to Pelto’s blog, “Wait What?” contains links to additional posts regarding Adamowski.

This story, from the Cincinnati Enquirer, introduced Adamowski as the new superintendent in May 1998.

This story, from the Cincinnati Enquirer dated June 25, 2002, announces Adamowski’s resignation as superintendent to teach at the University of Missouri. The link also contains a sidebar titled “Initial outcry gave way to praise for Adamowski.”

In a February 2014 report, the CT Mirror takes a look at Adamowski’s legacy after three years of leading the Windham school district as a state Special Master.

This story from The Day in New London, dated Feb. 6, 2015, reports that Special Master Adamowski would be turning over the reins for that city’s schools to Manny Rivera, but that the district “should be closely monitored.”

Hearst Connecticut Media Group columnist Wendy Lecker, in July 2014, opined about Adamowski in relation to his work in Windham, New London and Hartford.

A September 2000 Cincinnati magazine story profiles Adamowski’s hiring and work with the city’s school system.

A 2013 Windham Week blog post is a lengthy detailing of a situation involving Adamowski and his bid to bring a charter school to Windham, to the eventual surprise of the Windham Board of Education.

 

 

 

Comments

53 responses to “BoE release of super choice’s name greeted with mixed reaction”

  1. FYI

    From columnist Wender Lecker, “He cut funding for Windham’s successful pre-K program and reduced the capacity of Windham’s bilingual program-even though over a quarter of the students are English Language Learners. He pushed the use of Teach for America, replacing experienced local teachers with temporary recent college graduates.”
    Does Norwalk really want to take a chance on this guy? Just as our pre-K initiatives are kicking in? Will he put Norwalk’s bilingual program in jeopardy, especially when 40% of our students are latino? Will the failed “Teach for America”, a union-busting initiative for failed school districts around the country, be implemented here?
    Come on Norwalk, we can do better than this!!! “Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.”

  2. John Hamlin

    He is not in the pocket of the teachers unions. That’s an essential qualification of any superintendent. And one that will prompt enormous opposition from the status quo “take care of the teachers instead of the students” union groupies.

  3. Anne Sullivan

    Thank you Mark for the thorough research and links. As an elementary teacher, I’m waiting to see who he brings in as his team to help us move forward . We’ve put SOME greatly needed improvements in place, and we need to keep building.

  4. Jason White

    Mark..no need for me to use a search engine. My previous link was sent by a friend in new london. It seems that it made the rounds among the parents and teachers there. They’re a bit intrigued (that’s a much more milder word than what they used, but that’s between them and their school district) about how the person who approved the hiring of their superintendent got that superintendent’s job.

    In any event, good luck to you and Nancy; I’m sure there will lots of comments to be moderated over the coming days (or possibly weeks).

  5. Lisa Thomson

    I welcome Dr. Adamowski’s administration skills and ability to come into our dysfunctional district and clean things up. Well done BOE! Over the past ten years, I’ve watched NPSs third floor turn into a vast wasteland due to a number of contributing factors including: 1) a conscious, decentralization initiative (that I was told years ago) was initiated by Corda 2) some school principals doing what they please, as they please with no repercussions 3) an NFT President, who for decades has pretty much had carte Blanche (per negotiated contract rules) to do as he pleases, when he pleases and finally 4) increasing expenses coupled with declining dollars – taxed or granted.

    These four factors have left the district with inconsistent policies across the city and under achievement results for many of our students and quite frankly yielded this district ungovernable, as witnessed by the revolving door of superintendents and competent support staff they have hired. This ‘wild west’ atmosphere demands that we engaged the skills and services of a man experienced in such environments. Quite frankly, the next stop for Norwalk would be a state takeover. As Dr. Adamowski is already experienced in such matters the Board may have just saved us that extra step. Welcome to Norwalk Dr. Adamowski!

  6. MarjorieM

    I have heard that Adamowski got additional money from the State for Manny Rivera’s salary in New London (for the first year). Is this really an instance of “one hand washes the other?”

    1. Mark Chapman

      @marjoriem

      The state is making up the difference in pay between Rivera’s Norwalk contract and his new, substantially lower New London salary for the final 5 months of the fiscal year. It is no big secret but, as is usually the case, the rumor is embellish and adds sinister overtones. See the story at http://www.theday.com/article/20150130/NWS01/301309960

  7. M. Murray

    Will there be a provision in his contract containing substantial economic penalties if he decides to leave before the fulfillment of his contract? Both previous superintendents left early leaving the city in a lurch.

  8. Mike Lyons

    M. Murray, we have told Adamowski that the final contract must include a provision for deferred compensation that would be forfeited if he leaves before his three year employment agreement expires.

  9. MarjorieM

    Is there a reason the contract can not be made public for the taxpayers?

  10. MarjorieM

    I believe the facts stand on their own, Mark. The article you provided stated:

    (1) Rivera got money from the State Department towards his salary so that he could equal what NORWALK was paying him
    (2) Adamowski was asked by the reporter for a copy of Rivera’s contract
    (3) Adamowski was working for the State Dept. In New London.

    When does the State Department ever pay towards a superintendent’s salary?
    Draw your own conclusions. Perhaps I have a sinister mind. I can’t see how this is just a coincidence. But that’s my opinion. Guess I need proof that Adamowski did not get the extra $25,000 for Rivera……If not, who did request and get the additional salary?

  11. QuickNote

    One wonders why there was not a deferred compensation clause in Mr. Rivera’s contract for an early exit and why is the State (tax payers), paying for part of Mr. Rivera’s contract? Wow!
    Thank you

  12. EveT

    When I read that Adamowski is “a supporter of education reform” I wonder the same thing I always wonder. What exactly does “education reform” mean? It seems to mean different things to different people, all of them insisting of course that it’s for the good of the kids.

  13. Mike Lyons

    Quicknote, there hasn’t been a deferred compensation plan in ANY superintendent’s contract in Norwalk’s history, nor are they found in most other towns’. The recent national phenomenon of shorter and shorter superintendent terms (not by any means unique to Norwalk) has created problems with constant leadership turnover in school systems. This time around we decided to take affirmative steps to deal with it in advance, by withholding a portion of the compensation and requiring the superintendent to stay a full three years or forfeit it. We can’t force him to stay, but he will take a definite “hit” if he leaves early.

    Eve, good question. I guess the fundamental question is ‘are you satisfied with what we have?’ Many of the employees in NPS are (despite the large gap in achievement of many of our students). We term the people who find that state of affairs acceptable the “status quo” folks. Fundamentally, a “reformer” is someone who DOESN’T accept the status quo, and is willing to undertake significant changes in organization, curriculum, personnel, etc., in order the break out of the current situation and raise student achievement substantially. By that criteria, Adamowski is definitely a reformer.

    Case in point. Hartford had three large, utterly failing high schools when Adamowski took over there. All three were the lowest performing in the State and had a cohort graduation rate of 29% (i.e., a 71% drop-out rate). He replaced them over time with 12 small “themed” high schools. The graduation rate rose to 60%
    when he left after four years. It is now up to 70 per cent. That’s reform.

  14. Mike:

    Mike,

    Please promise that there won’t be an issue of the superintendent’s certification. I have looked at the state department of education website where people can look up educator certifications, and I have seen that Dr. Adamowski is no longer certified. However, it doesn’t indicate if a person is in the process of becoming certified.

    There was a certification problem in Bridgeport only a year or two ago with that city’s superintendent at the time, who also came to Connecticut with the reputation of being a reformer. Bridgeport’s board of education ended up in court, and it diverted attention from the real issues of that district for months. It also created unnecessary expense, and it further divided an already fractured board of education. The former superintendent never became certified, and he resigned.

    Norwalk can’t afford that kind of upheaval, so I am counting on you to ensure that there is no issue with Dr. Adamowski’s certification.

    1. Mark Chapman

      @Mike:

      Please re-read the story you commented on and read the paragraphs after the page break. This is addressed with comments from both Adamowski and Lyons. Don’t know how many times it will need to be repeated and how many times it will be ignored or dismissed, but the information is there. If someone brings forth a legal challenge and finds that the exemption is not legal, we will report that as well.

  15. Sped parent

    To Lisa Thomson: I was just wondering if you by any chance would reveal what schools are on your list when you say, “some school principals doing what they please, as they please, with no repurcussions.” I have found the lack of accountability shocking, particularly when it involves our childrens’ lives and our finances. Thank you.

  16. Yankee Clipper

    Marj,
    Of course you would be quoting Pelto. Who the world is he??? What credibility does he have? He has his own agenda and it is to stop reform. He would love you and your “old Norwalk” ways.

  17. Lisa Thomson

    Where’s Mr. Pelto been? Norwalk’s governanability issues have been known in Hartford political circles for years. Strange Mr. Pelto is suddenly finding his voice regarding Norwalk’s latest superintendent choice? Could it’ be that we have finally got it right this time?

  18. MarjorieM

    Yes, Lisa Thomson, Mr. Pelto and all those who commented on his article (did you read the comments?) are all wrong and you and Mike Lyons are the only ones who are right. Amazing how many people can be so wrong!

  19. Lisa Thomson

    @Marj – I read your post link from Mr. Pelto. And all those comments? It seems 12/19 were from the SAME person ! Please….it’s the same three people commenting on Mr. Pelto’s opinion piece, not ALL those people, as you suggest.

    Here’s my take, the BOE tried the nice approach with Marks, and then the smooth approach with Rivera. What happened? The NPS status quo chewed up and spit out two nationally recognized superintendents. So guess what, I applaud the BOE for choosing (excuse my French) a hard-ass that will deal with all of the insubordination and chaos. Norwalk needs some discipline. Parents and taxpayers have had enough of the circus-like atmosphere. Unlike most other cities in Connecticut, Our property taxes directly FUND over 90% of the school system. The petty squabbling that has turned into a sport for some has got to stop. It looks like Adamowski manages districts with a tighter fist and that there are consequences. Seems to me, that’s exactly what Norwalk needs.

    @SPED Parent – I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to comment on specific principals in this forum. However, the CREC reports, posted on the Red Apples website highlight some of the issues you refer to.

  20. R.L.

    I can tell you what to expect ffrom […] Adamowski. You’re going to get a lot of double-speak as choices are reduced under the guise of school choice, as support systems for ELL and Special Education students are decimated, as alternative programs are shut down and the emotionally disturbed students who needed them are reintroduced into the “main stream”, and as you’re old neighborhood schools become crucibles of the most difficult and needy students while the better students in your district are creamed off into charter and magnet schools. Adamowski has NO skills with regard to school improvement. He is a master of the shell game though. Gee, lets take all of the good students from the neighborhood schools and concentrate them into one building. Then you can take credit for creating a successful school. That’s an easy con and it’s easy to see if anyone actually took the time to look. What about the students and the neighborhood schools that are left behind? I work in a left behind school. We are lacking in services, supplies (including textbooks), and discipline. It’s funny how these reformer types work. They concentrate the better students into one place and call it success while leaving the students who actually need support behind. Then they go and blame the teachers for the low functioning of the left behind school. Adamowski and his ilk don’t fix anything. They just sweep what they don’t want people looking at under the rug.

    Thiss post was edited to comply with our policy against name-calling.

  21. Sped parent

    @LisaThomson – Thank you for your reply. I completely understand. I read the CREC report again after having read it when it was initially released and witnessing firsthand virtually all of the problems within special education in Norwalk. It was bad then, and the lack of accountability, imho, is as problematic for the taxpayers as it was then.

  22. Hello, the much maligned Jonathan Pelto here – humored by the various insults about my motives. Aren’t most people driven by a set of beliefs? Mine happen to be pro-student, pro-parent, pro-teacher. I don’t believe Mr. Adamowski measures up and so I opine about it. Great thing about America, I have a right to speak and you don’t even have to listen.

    As to the certification issues, Mark Chapman writes, “Board of Education Chairman Mike Lyons said the allegations are not true. ‘The ‘nonrenewable certification’ that Pelto refers to (which expired on 11/7/07) was replaced by a new certificate issued the day before its expiration (on 11/6/07). That certificate remains in effect. I’ll get a copy of it for you.’

    Here is the problem Mr. Lyons – that isn’t true. There is no other certification – although do please post the copy you have.

    There is a process the Norwalk BOE can go through to get a waiver. But it actually requires knowing the law.

    Of course, if you’d already gone through the process you probably have an obligation to tell your constituents that you knew Adamowski was not certified to be a superintendent and you already went through the process without the board voting to do that.

    Here is my latest – it provides the background you apparently haven’t be given.

    Can Adamowski be named Norwalk’s Superintendent on Tuesday? – http://jonathanpelto.com/2015/06/14/can-adamowski-be-named-norwalks-superintendent-on-tuesday/

  23. MarjorieM

    Sounds like Special Ed parents, Bilingual parents and parents of struggling learners will have a very difficult (if not impossible) time under the new superintendent’s reign. Do your homework! This is about your children! I am most anxious to see the certification papers for this man. Mike?

    Just remember, Mike Lyons and Lisa Thonmson love this choice. Read Lisa Thomson’s quote:
    “So guess what, I applaud the BOE for choosing (excuse my French) a hard-ass that will deal with all of the insubordination and chaos. Norwalk needs some discipline.”

    With so many administrators retiring and taking jobs elsewhere, Lisa still seems to think NORWALK needs “a hard-ass” to discipline Norwalk. So much anger and hatred!

  24. MarjorieM

    Mike, you mentioned the penalty for Adamowski leaving early. What exactly is that?
    Is there a bonus for staying on? If so, what is the bonus?

  25. EveT

    If what Pelto says is true about Adomowski’s certification, then the BOE should be asking:
    How is it that a supposedly competent and surely expensive executive search firm like ProAct would recommend a candidate who is not qualified (certified / licensed) for the job?

  26. MarjorieM

    IF Adamowski does NOT have his certification, and I hope he does have it and will produce it, then perhaps PROACT was just too busy to check. PROACT Is thoroughly engaged in defending themselves against racial slurs made by its CEO, etc.
    Perhaps that’s why other districts across the country decided to cut their losses and choose another firm for their superintendent searches? One can only imagine the chaos in the PROACT offices.
    Or maybe several copies of the certification exist in their offices, as they have been allegedly known as the company that circulates superintendents around, as if the positions were the musical chairs game.

  27. EveT

    @Mike Lyons, thank you for the “status quo” vs. “reformer” dichotomy. But that still does not tell me what aspects of the status quo are to be reformed under an Adamowski administration.
    Surely not EVERYTHING currently going on in Norwalk’s schools is bad. There must be some positive things — which I believe the current BOE has often mentioned — as well as some things that aren’t so great. So, what are the things Adamowski will set out to improve?
    Furthermore, on a national scale we see the term “education reform” thrown around, surely with broader ramifications than just improving the status quo in Norwalk, CT. My impression is that it’s just another phrase like “what’s best for the child” that actually only means whatever the candidate wants it to mean.

  28. @RL

    wHat is your profile so that we can assess your comments? Parent? Teacher? Union member or official? Administrator? What district? What is your familiarity with candidate? Was there ever an issue over which you and candidate disagreed? Is there anything that should be disclosed that might impact your objectivity?

    In reference to your comment of gutting special Ed programs, what is the factual basis for that’ statement? I am not seeking an opinion or even an interpretation of facts or events. I would like to know if there is independently verifiable info that supports that position.

    I look forward to your factual and data supported response

  29. EveT – Your question about ProSearch is a good one. The company has worked with Mr. Adamowski on a number of occasions – including getting him as a finalist in Seattle before he withdrew his name. I assure you that Steven Adamowski DOES NOT have the certification necessary to be a superintendent in Connecticut. For those who want to hire him there is a way, thanks to Governor Malloy, to get around that law but there is a process that is legally required. I outline it on my blog

  30. Sped parent – If your have a child with special education needs, I strongly urge you to contact special education advocates in Hartford, New London and Windham or even state-wide advocacy groups. I absolutely assure you that you will find Mr. Adamowski’s record on special education services troubling.

  31. Yankee Clipper – You are absolutely entitled to your opinion but in case this you are very wrong. Although I am opposed to the Education Reform agenda including the Common Core and the SBAC Common Core testing scam, I actually know a bit about education policy and law. As a state legislator i was extremely involved in the development of the educational enhancement act and the original ECS formula – a formula that some would say causes Norwalk particular hardship. I am extremely familiar with education law and the issues surrounding the education reform movement. I would be happy to discuss that matter with you at any time or if you have questions you can certainly contact me.

  32. NPS Retired Teacher

    We have not had a dedicated superintendent since Ralph Sloan. The number of poor candidates that have filed through NPS have been horrific. I was hoping that this search would be different and offer up an individual, who would be perfect for the job.

    It appears that once again, the search was done without any transparency, and the selected person does not really fit the profile I had in mind. After researching this man’s entire career, I am at a loss as to why he was selected. If you analyze the data supplied by the various districts, it appears that student performance was not enhanced by any of the programs or changes made by Dr. Adamowski.

    The various people on this site who continuously criticize the hard work of many in the district do not realize that our students are performing well in spite of the lackluster superintendents we have had the last seven years. The parents, teachers, students, administrators, and taxpayers deserve better than what Michael Lyons and his gang are now trying to push down our throats.

    The plan should be to take some time to find the right candidate. There should be transparency in his/her selection. Why the hurry? This man is not right for Norwalk Public Schools just like Rosenberg, Herbert, Corda, Marks, and Rivera did not fit the profile.

    PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANOTHER MISTAKE. THE STUDENTS DESERVE BETTER.

  33. Sue Haynie

    A snapshot of Adamowski’s thoughts on special ed:

    “…. there is another piece to the education of Steven Adamowski. His and Theresa’s only child, Christina, has a learning disability…..’Becoming a parent-my whole view of education changed.’ Adamowski said. The world flipped from a teacher’s-eye view to that of a father. ‘Having a special-needs child made me so much more aware of the need for special education. A lot of my professional interest in education became a personal one.’”

    Thanks for Nancy on Norwalk for such robust reporting, below is a link to the article where the quote above can be found (page 108).

    https://books.google.com/books?id=5-0CAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=Adamowski+hudson+institute&source=bl&ots=qW3WWyXxNh&sig=_UfAoN5ciCYgN9Rv75Giq3faVIc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDgQ6AEwBGoVChMIm8qgq7GLxgIViU6SCh1ipQDM#v=thumbnail&q=Adamowski%20hudson%20institute&f=true

  34. Sue Haynie

    SpedParent. Here are some highlights relating to your question about school principals. When I was on the Board of Ed, I was told by the former PPS director that the 4 or 5 schools that were found to be problematic in the CREC 2008 report were the same schools that were still problematic when a follow-up CREC 2012 report was commissioned.

    Here are two quotes from the CREC 2012 report speaking to that problem:

    CREC 2012 page 2: “The custom of building based decision overriding central office decisions on use of special ed resources and compliance issues is problematic.”

    CREC 2012 page 10—“Parents and staff indicated that there continue to be significant differences in the special ed process, quality of programs and services, resources available and in communication issues related to special ed students depending upon the school, with some schools considered to be much better than others. The inconsistencies in process and the inequities that exist from school to school are still problematic in the district (from CREC 2008). This has a huge effect on the parents and students who are uncertain of the level of quality of services from school to school.”

    Here is the CREC 2012 PowerPoint: http://redapplesnorwalk.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/CREC-2012-POWER-POINT_PRESENTED-TO-BOE-FEB-5-2013.pdf

    Here’s the audio of the Board of Ed meeting when Peg McDonald of CREC presented the CREC 2012 report: https://soundcloud.com/lshaynie/boe-meeting-2-5-13-crec-report

  35. Tony P

    @Lisa
    I don’t know – maybe I missed something, but as a former NPS employee (and married to a current NPS employee), the teachers were fully on board with both Marks and Manny. More so w/ Manny, b/c he was more of a people person, but Marks was in the buildings and she was smart. The Board of Ed ran both of them out (publicly!)not the teachers. Not sure what you’re referring to when you speak of wild west or state takeover? Perhaps you can enlighten me. The most out of control facet of the NPS is the Board of Ed. Start there first. And if you think Adamoswki is the guy, it sure looks like he gets his pocket padded and then high tails it out of town (see Cincinnati) leaving smoke and ruin behind. Better yet, why don’t you and Mike Lyons figure out how to get the state to change their ECS formula, so that way, we can fund our schools w/ 70% of our tax dollars instead of the 90% you claim. I’m outraged MY tax dollars went to a search firm (that this guy has been tied to in the past) to, out of all the highly qualified candidates, came up with this guy! I think the Norwalk taxpayers should ask for a refund! Adamowski is going to make Corda look like a rock star!

  36. Question for Ms Haynie

    Ms Haynie,

    Do you have any insights into the reason that the 4 – 5 problematic schools’ principals haven’t experienced serious consequences for their failure to do business in a way that is consistent with the district’s expectations, or have CO administrators limited their response to complaining about the situation and doing nothing more about it? (This is not a rhetorical question. I really don’t know the answer.)

  37. MarjorieM

    Norwalk has attracted the attention of many people in Connecticut!

    http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2015/06/a-report-on-steven-adamowski-and.html

  38. EveT

    OK, if “Steven Adamowski DOES NOT have the certification necessary to be a superintendent in Connecticut,” then the BOE should be demanding to know why they paid all this money to ProAct only to have them come up with him.
    You mean there’s no available candidate who IS certified to be a superintendent in CT? This guy is the best you could find? That is what the BOE, and Norwalk taxpayers, ought to be demanding to know.

  39. To reiterate an earlier comment I posted – At this point Mr. Adamowski CAN NOT work in a Connecticut school because he lacks the necessary certification – but there is a process the TOWN can use to get that requirement waived.

    To me the question is this.

    Adamowski had Connecticut certification. 55,000 other teachers and administrators have it as well – some are good, some are not so good and some are bad – but all participated in professional development programs to keep their certification, all paid for their certification and renewed certification as required by law, all did the legal things required of keep their certification in “good standing.” But not Adamowski.

    And even more incredible is that knowing he couldn’t participate in the teacher pension program Adamowski failed to make any effort to become re-certified – a process hundreds of people do every year.

    At any point he could have taken the necessary steps to become certified again. There are even alternative routes to get a certification. And he simply did not do what was necessary and legally required to work in a Connecticut school and get a Connecticut teacher pension — even though he wanted that pension and apparently wanted to work as a superintendent —- why?

    Why?

    We would never let a doctor work without their license whether they had natural talent or not.

  40. Lisa Thomson

    @ Tony P – You’re absolutely correct – teachers were on board with Marks and Rivera. Nowhere, in ANY of my posts have I ever suggested otherwise. Sadly tho, both union heads made Marks’ life miserable and the majority of NPS staff seemed impervious to stop them and others. The NFT head, seemed to play nicer with Rivera, but others continued. It’s always somebody in NPS with a grudge. It’s exhausting to watch. Personally, I think the superintendent position is a poison chalice – but it’s the way education governance is structured.

    I agree there are problematic members on the BOE, some more publicly destructive than others. Their behavior was a factor in Rivera’s decision to leave. But you have to ask, as I have- who within NPS put them up to their antics? I’ve actively engage in campaigns in the past and will continue to try to get the best folks elected, regardless of political affiliation but you win some, lose some.

    As for ECS funding – I’ve fought that battle for 5 years. It’s a shame some of our more prominent state politicians, like Sen. Duff have not taken up a stronger fight for Norwalk, but then Stamford gets stiffed just as much as we do and their guy is the Governor. Property values drive the funding formula (not FRL students) and for us to get more, other towns would have to get less and that’s just not how state politics work.

    Not sure why you directed your post at me, other than I identify myself, when most do not. Seems the honest thing to do. I’m just an opinionated lax mom 🙂 who after 25 years in the corporate world was forced to make some family choices after recurring health issues. For the past 11 years, I’ve continued to do the traditional PTO, parent volunteering and fundraising gigs for my elementary, middle, high school and district. I’m not a politician, nor on the NPS payroll. But public education has a lot of moving parts and I’ve seen most of them. One kid is graduating, the other nearly done. On balance, our high schools are great, but K-8 needs help to prepare kids for higher learning and beyond. Not all of NPS is broken, but we can do better. Allowing superintendents to be run out of town is doing nobody any good. I wish the teachers would speak up more- but I understand why they don’t.

  41. MarjorieM

    Yes, Lisa, you are a parent who has volunteered in the NPS. All of them? No! But you seem to know EVERYTHING about ALL of the schools and central office as well. As a result you want NPS to be “disciplined.” You want a “hard-ass” superintendent to be appointed. Your words, not mine. Who appointed you as the evaluator of everyone? What are your qualifications? You and your little Apple followers are causing good people to leave the district. You and your Apple followers are fully backing a candidate for the superintendent’s ‘ position who doesn’t even have the usual certification for the job. You and Mike Lyons are taking full responsibility if this man is appointed.

  42. NorwalkSPEDPartners

    On behalf of NorwalkSPEDPartners we would like to know anything and everything about the candidate’s position and history on special education matters. There have been comments that he would ‘gut’ the special ed department. There have also been indications that he has a child with an LD and is therefore very sympathetic to these matters. Recently there has been some press about the costs associated with the Special Ed programs in our District. It is possible that there can be some savings by reducing the outplacement of some students. However, a decision cannot be made to simply ‘repatriate’ these kids without adequate programs in place that will be waiting for them in house to meet their needs. In addition, you cannot expect a parent to place their child in an experimental program that shakes out the bugs as the program moves along and is adjusted. You really cannot expect a parent to let their child be used as a guinea pig as a new program is tried out. It seems that you might almost need to import a program or start very slowly and with those students that may only need a minimal amount of assistance and gradually grow it from within. So — if anyone has any info about the candidate’s track record in the realm of special ed, please share this info. Conclusory statements such as he would gut the program might have some value as one person’s opinion, but we would be interested more in hard facts and figures. Thank you so much for your help.

  43. Townie

    From reading the proposed contract by and between Adamowski and the BOE, there certainly appears to be many serious financial and compensation matters that will be finalized after his appointment is approved. Why not take the time to get these resolved and made public, before approval? In addition, Adamowski currently lives in Ansonia. Will he be required to move to Norwalk? Can we hear from Mr. Lyons?

  44. Sped parent

    Thank you, Ms. Haynie for your comments regarding special ed. I have witnessed what you pointed out firsthand, and it is a tremendous waste of money for Norwalk taxpayers, not to mention it can, and unfortunately at times does, change the course of a child’s life forever.

    To Lisa Thomson, I respect that you put your name on the blog, and I wholeheartedly agree that it is the honest thing to do to identify oneself. Having said that, not all NPS staff are able to seperate the child from the parent and sometimes take issues they have with the parent out on the child. When it is a child’s life at stake, to me it is very understandable why people are afraid to identify themselves.

  45. Sue Haynie

    To: Question for Ms. Haynie:

    In answer to your question, there’s been years of inconsistency in delivery in SPED and general ed in Norwalk PS. That’s documented in several 3rd party reports (CREC 2008, 2012, GE, Cambridge).

    One of the many things done inconsistently—holding people accountable and following the process.

    What’s been consistent in NPS? The NFT and NASA presidents and the Deputy Superintendent have had the same jobs—three people who have had power and control over curriculum, instruction, all principals, administrators and all teachers for almost a decade.

  46. Sue Haynie

    Below is a portion of the Minutes from the January 31, 2013 Committee meeting I chaired while still on the BOE. The topic is the storage of Personnel Records. Take special note of the discussion on ‘CC Personnel’.

    ” BOARD OF EDUCATION
    NEGOTIATION AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
    Thursday, January 31, 2013
    Present: Sue Haynie, Mike Lyons,
    Staff: Tony Daddona, Elio Longo
    Others: Tony Ditrio, Bruce Mellion, Lisa Thomson, Mike Barbis (BOE), Matt Coyne (Hour)
    REVIEW OF PROCESS FOR THE STORAGE OF PERSONNEL RECORDS:
    Elio Longo read a summary from Bob Dylewski of Human Resources: Personnel records of all current employees are stored in locked storage at Human Resources (HR) in City Hall under lock and control of Human Resources. In order for a staff member to access their storage records, an appointment needs to be made with HR. An HR staff member is assigned to sit with the employee in a conference room; the staff member stays the entire time while the employee looks through their file jacket to ensure that no documents are added or taken. This is true of any current employees or any employees under litigation or settlement. All those files are kept on the 3rd floor. Records of former employees are stored in basement, and to retrieve and look at, a person has to schedule an appointment with HR. The only records stored at the schools are the principal’s records and copies of evaluations; copies of the evaluations are also sent to HR at City Hall. Mr. Daddona said that ‘cc-personnel file’ must be written on the documents in order for the document to come to Human Resources. Ms. Haynie asked if there was any reason why a personnel record wouldn’t be in the personnel file. Mr. Daddona said that it’s possible they didn’t get put in the file and that it’s key that the principals put “CC-Personnel” so that the file comes to HR at City Hall and is in the legal file. If the record doesn’t have “CC-Personnel” it doesn’t go in the personnel file. Ms. Haynie asked if that happened very often. Mr. Daddona said that until recently the principals weren’t putting ‘CC-Personnel”, it had been a practice; they didn’t know they had to do it, so it wouldn’t come to HR at City Hall. Mr. Ditrio said if there is an issue with a staff member and a staff member is written up, that is outside the evaluation process and is stored in a separate place; it is not stored as part of the evaluation. He said nothing is put in an employee’s file without them knowing about it. If it didn’t come downtown to HR City Hall, it was never intended to be part of their record. He noted that things don’t get placed in someone’s record unless you mean to take action. Mr. Ditrio noted.”

  47. NorwalkSPEDPartners

    A question has arisen about whether or not some of the schools were acting or perceived as acting too independently in order for our District to operate efficiently. Some of the commentators have asked for backup or reference for this proposition.

    On January 8, 2015 the MORE Commission of the State Legislature conducted a hearing locally (NCC) seeking public input on potential changes to the laws and practices in Connecticut as they pertain to special education. Mr. Joseph Russo of the Norwalk Public Schools special ed department (known as, the “Pupil and Personnel Services” Department)spoke. Questions were asked about the implementation of a particular program (SRBI)and on how it might be implemented in the Norwalk Public School System. He indicated that the program was implemented ‘inconsistently’ — and in some locations, “hardly implemented at all”.

    Here is a link to his testimony:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ0dGzfvxNs&feature=youtu.be

    [His comment on this appears at the 1:45:22 mark]

    The important part about what he said, for the purposes of the current discussion, has nothing to do with the SRBI program. It has to do with why the program was not be consistently implemented (or “hardly implemented at all”).He said that in the buildings that Principals “have their kingdom” and that “they will do what they think is important for their school” [1:46:10]. He said that it was the people in the buildings who were making decisions about ‘how certain things were being implemented, or not implemented at all’ [1:47:00].

    He had indicated earlier that he had previously worked in the Greenwich School system. He was asked to compare how this might differ from how orders were followed in that district. He said that in Greenwich ‘the Central Office laid down the expectation of what was to be followed and it was quite clear in the Greenwich Public Schools that this is what you were going to do (or you’d be spoken to if it wasn’t done)” [1:47:50]He said that the difference between the two was a matter of leadership.

    Having said all that, on the issue of a new Superintendent where does that leave us? On the one hand, it seems that we want/need a strong leader. On the other hand some commentators have indicated that the candidate is too dictatorial. Of course, it is hard for us to judge this unless we know what vantage point the speaker is looking at things from. It is important therefore for all points of view to be backed up with facts and data.

  48. Adamowski is a star “expert” witness for Governor Malloy against the position Norwalk’s Mayor and other elected officials have been working so hard to achieve – Why would Norwalk hire one of Malloy’s key witnesses against fair school funding for Norwalk http://jonathanpelto.com/2015/06/15/why-would-norwalk-hire-one-of-malloys-key-witnesses-against-fair-school-funding-for-norwalk/

  49. Sue Haynie

    Blogger Pelto v.s. Blogger Megan DeSombre. Certainly makes for interesting reading.

    http://educationbridgeport.com/jon-pelto-responds-to-me-by-emailing-my-parents-seriously/

  50. NorwalkSPEDPartners

    Thanks to Sue Haynie for providing us with these links. Also, many kudos to NON for providing this coverage and for giving the taxpayers the ability to gain this information.

    Norwalk SPEDPartners is the parents’ group for special ed/504 families that was formed in the wake of the CREC and Cambridge reports that demonstrated the many weaknesses of the Norwalk PS special ed program. As stated previously, we are interested in the facts and, most importantly, how the appointment of the current candidate would benefit or impact these programs in our school system. It is interesting to see how our local decision has created such a statewide buzz — mostly from a single blogger. Obviously, how the candidate has performed in other districts (or even States), the programs he has supported or instituted (or killed), and the educational philosophies he has put into effect (a much greater barometer of what to expect than to merely consider the philosophies that he has espoused)are of keen interest to us in Norwalk. So, for that, we are grateful for all this coverage.

    In the meantime, we do not wish to get caught in the crossfire of some border war between Union and administration supporters. We do not want the Norwalk Superintendent appointment issue (so important to us on the most personal level imaginable — the fate and future of our children)to serve as a proxy war battleground between these interests.

    In Mr. Pelto’s own writing (in the link provided by Ms. Haynie), he is attributed as making the following statement:

    “When I left the General Assembly, I had one of the highest AFL-CIO labor ratings of any legislators and had a 100% voting record with all the liberal and progressive advocacy groups”.

    Is that what this is really about? Is this liberal vs. conservative? Union vs. Administration? Or, is it about what is good for Norwalk and our children?

    Norwalk SPEDPartners does not care about politics. A person can hold whatever political or personal belief they wish. What we care about is the facts. Even a statement from a biased messenger needs to be listened to if the message is true. We just want to make sure that we have the facts and are able to make the right decision for our children here in Norwalk and that we are not just being used as a puzzle piece in some larger picture.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link