Quantcast
Advertisement

‘Loving’ environment for South Norwalk kids celebrated at SoNoCC open house

NORWALK, Conn. — A new era began Thursday at the South Norwalk Community Center, Board of Directors Chairman Warren Peña said, celebrating the recently completed renovations and the expected Monday opening of the long-awaited District 99 after-school program.

South Norwalk Community Center board Chairman Warren Peña, left, shares a laugh with Norwalk Redevelopment Agency Chairman Felix Serrano at Thursday's open house.
South Norwalk Community Center Board Chairman Warren Peña, left, shares a laugh with Norwalk Redevelopment Agency Chairman Felix Serrano at Thursday’s open house.

The thought was echoed by others at the open house, attended by some of the Norwalk leaders who made the renovations come about by authorizing $200,000 in Community Block Development Grant (CDBG) funds, community members and teachers, one of whom performed a dance. Visitors taking a tour learned each of the three new classrooms has its own bathroom attached to it, so the kids on their way to the potty will not have to mingle with adults using the Community Center.

“I think it’s beautiful. I barely recognize the place – it’s gorgeous,” Board of Education member Sherelle Harris said. “They’ve done a great job with it and hopefully the program will be equally as great.”

Of the 115 children who signed up for the SoNoCC After the Bell program, a brainchild of former Norwalk Superintendent of Schools Manny Rivera, 62 were admitted through a lottery. Part of Peña’s work for the event was to show Redevelopment Agency officials around the place, highlighting the idea that some of the unrenovated space at the front of the building could be turned into another classroom for 30 children if the Common Council approves $80,000 in CDBG funding this year.

SoNoCC 15-0430 015
From left, Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Tim Sheehan, South Norwalk Community Center Board Chairman Warren Peña, RDA Attorney Marc Grenier and RDA Chairman Felix Serrano get a look at “the blue room,” where kids in kindergarten through second grade will take after-school classes. Adults will use the classrooms during the day, Peña said.

The $80,000 would also make a new reception area, separate entirely from the classroom area.

There is some question that the After the Bell program will be funded next year because the state has recently said it is ineligible for the Title I funding on which Rivera was depending.

“That was in the works for a long period of time and then it got stopped,” Norwalk Interim Superintendent of Schools James Connelly said Friday. “We are committed to do it next year. It’s going to take some creative budgeting and my thing is to develop it in such a way we are eligible for more federal money, Title I money.”

Conversations have already been had with the state about how to do that and the goal is to have it all set before a new superintendent comes in, Connelly said.

“I am very optimistic. We take one step at a time every day. We’ve got to look at all possible avenues to keep this program moving forward,” said Tricia Massucco, who runs After the Bell for the school system.

There are more than 500 children in District 99, a part of South Norwalk with no home school for the kids to think of as a neighborhood base.

“This is going to make a big difference in their lives,” Massucco said. “I look at all the people that we still have on a wait list moving forward; because we do have a number of fifth-graders, the slots will open up in the program. But we’re very excited. This is something that I have wanted for such a long time, and when Manny came on he saw a vision in this as well. I’m just glad that we, although starting later than planned, we’re just excited that we can get it open this year.”

SoNoCC Executive Director Kelly Robertson recently tried unsuccessfully to get city funding for enrichment programs, which would have included dance. The open house featured a performance by Tiffany Wilson, one of two After the Bell teachers who also dance.

The work on the center is “awesome,” Wilson said, calling what is going on now a big change from what went on when Norwalk Economic Opportunity Now (NEON) was the dominant force in the building.

“Honestly, I’m not going to say I’m a Norwalk native but I’ve lived here a very long time and this is NEON,” Wilson said. “I used to try to get programs running here, it didn’t work. I’m glad that (Robertson) is here and she is fighting because we need a community of people that are going to be genuine to children and really love them, and do as much as they can do for them. So I am honored that I can be a part of the staff.”

“Someone said ‘it takes a village to raise a child,’” the Rev. Oscar Destruge, a SoNoCC board member, said in his opening prayer. “As we lament and pray over the situation in Baltimore, I can’t get out of my mind a Baltimore mother’s tears and plea: ‘Our kids have nothing to do. Give us a community center. Help us to keep them out of trouble.’

“That is the vision you’ve given those who established this center many years ago, and the vision continues to shine,” Destruge continued. “At some point it appeared that the center had seen its last days. But through the leadership, commitment and support from our chairman, Warren Peña, its current board members, the City Council, and individuals who gave generously of their time, money and talents, we are here this afternoon to rededicate this building and its programs to create a learning environment in South Norwalk, to help kids of all races and backgrounds to stay out of trouble and excel in their education.”

SoNoCC 15-0430 005
From left, South Norwalk Community Center Executive Director Kelly Robertson, SoNoCC board Chairman Warren Peña, Mayor Harry Rilling, and SoNoCC board members the Rev. Oscar Destruge, Common Councilwoman Michelle Maggio (R-District C) and Lauren Rosato celebrate the center at Thursday’s open house.

 

Comments

20 responses to “‘Loving’ environment for South Norwalk kids celebrated at SoNoCC open house”

  1. Non partisan

    Sounds like a great program.

    Just one question. 62 of the 115 slots were awarded by lottery. What criteria was used for all of the others?

  2. Mike Lyons

    115 children applied for the 62 available slots, and the 62 were chosen by lottery; the rest of the children, regrettably, didn’t get in. The hope is to gradually expand the SoNoCC program, and add others, so more children can be served. One step at a time.

  3. LWitherspoon

    @Mike Lyons

    Congratulations to the BoE and all the others involved in making After the Bell a reality.

    Nancy’s article notes that more than 500 children live in District 99. Were all 500 eligible to apply for After the Bell? If so, does this mean 115 out of 500+ eligible children, or roughly 20%, applied for the program?

  4. Non partisan

    Thank you for the clarification.

  5. Mike Lyons

    LW, yes, that’s correct. As I said, its a start.

  6. Kathleen Montgomery

    It’s a great start. Thanks to everyone who helped to make this happen.

  7. MarjorieM

    Perhaps money can be found in consultant’s fees? Mike, I am still waiting for the MOU for the consultant hired by Rivera for what I say is a total of $100,000 yearly for visits twice monthly.

  8. LWitherspoon

    @Mike Lyons

    It’s a great start and all of Norwalk should be grateful to you and all involved.

    I’m interested in the question of why only 115 out of 500 eligible children applied for free child care and educational help that’s close to home. Presumably it was up to parents or guardians to apply on a child’s behalf. That being the case, did the adults responsible for the non-applicants not know, not care, or have some other impediment?

  9. Mrs. Ruby McPherson

    Lets hope it’s equally diverse, a;so what is their hiring process, as when was teacher aid and other jobs posted and will be posted?

  10. Mike Lyons

    Ruby, the teachers / aids are all employees of Norwalk Public Schools, not SoNoCC. The jobs are posted and filled in accordance with NPS’s employment policies and collective bargaining agreements. See http://www.applitrack.com/norwalk/onlineapp/default.aspx.

  11. MarjorieM

    Mike, how come you are not answering me?

    1. Mark Chapman

      @MarjorieM

      Here is the MOU link you requested re: consultant Regis Shields.

  12. Mike Lyons

    Marj, I sent the MOU to Mark; I understand he intends to write an article about BoE consultants. Of course, to the extent that consultants are funded with dedicated grants, we could not legally redirect those funds to other uses, so the money would not be usable, for instance, to fund the SoNoCC program.

    Jim Connelly is confident that we’ll be able to fund the program next year.

  13. Joanna Cooper

    Regis Anne Sheilds has quite the impressive resume as an expert in assisting urban school districts in innovative educational reform and running them efficiently by analyzing effective equitable resource use and applying best practices based on data driven decision making. She has a wide range of experience assisting with all facets of educational issues from student learning, professional development for teachers, administrative leadership, Union contracts, results driven budget practices, obtaining grants and creating policy. Just the kind of assistance Norwalk needs at this time. I sense the old guard is interested in what she is being paid because they might find her a threat.

  14. MarjorieM

    Thank you, Mark Chapman.

    Seems I was right about the (more than) $100,000 fee for the consultant. I was highly criticized by Mike Lyons for stating the truth. Mike, did you, the Chairman of the Board, not know about the fee paid to Regis, or were you lying?

    Do you have anything to say to me? Perhaps an apology?

  15. Marj, I confess — for the first two in over two years of back and forths here, you turned out to be right on something. I apologize for my error (I wasn’t lying, I just didn’t know the accurate contract amount). In the earlier posts you had referred continuously to grants, and that’s what I had focused on ($47,000 from GE supports this contract), not the contract. When I got the contract I saw that it was for over the $100,000, so your source in central office (for once) was right.

    Of course, my previous statement that this funding is not available for other uses remains correct.

  16. MarjorieM

    I hope people take the time to read the Memorandum of Understanding. This is a consultant who will be paid a great deal of money. She will be working in Norwalk for three years! Was a consultant really necessary when we had a renowned superintendent at the helm? It does make one wonder what a superintendent’s actual role is. This consultant alone will cost the district $230,000. Don’t you want to know who else was hired under Rivera and at what cost? Money is scarce in Norwalk for After the Bell and Special Ed. Where were the priorities? Local funds were spent on this consultant as well.
    Just what were the parameters of the grants paid by G.E and the other finder? So many questions, not the least of which is why Mr. Lyons made the comment about my source at central office. Was this supposed to be a big secret? Taxpayers shouldn’t ask questions when they see consultants walking around? Why the big secret?

  17. Marj, come on. None of this is “secret” (if it was I wouldn’t have gotten a copy of the contract for NON when it was requested). The $100,000 is 1/10 of 1% of the budget. It is funded by dedicated grant money that cannot legally be spent other than as directed by the grantor (so we couldn’t use it for ATB or SPED even if we wanted to).

    My comment about your contact at the central office is that this is clearly a member of the ‘old guard’, who slips you information that you dutifully post here as attacks on the school administration. I think Joanna Cooper hit the nail on the head: “I sense the old guard is interested in what she is being paid because they might find her a threat.”

  18. MarjorieM

    Really, Mike! You think someone at central office “slips” me information so that I can post it here? Shame on you! I am the one who asks the right questions to the right people!
    As for the big “secret,” I wonder how many people knew about the $230,000 contract with Regis. Was this shared with school administrators? Was there no one in central office who could write standards? What were the exact stipulations from the funders? I know, by inquiring, that Assistant Principals were shifted over to one of these funding grants. There is no change in what Assistant Principals do in the schools. Was that stipulated in the funding grant?
    Mike, there are many questions left to be answered. I hope these questions come up during election time! The public deserves to know.

  19. Marj, its obvious that someone is slipping you information – why not just admit it? You don’t simply “ask questions” – you ask very specific questions about contracts, for instance, or grants, that require an inside source. And your questions are invariably about “inside ball” – issues important to NPS insiders, but not to the general public. That’s why you raise issues about consultant contracts in NON articles about completely unrelated matters (e.g., pay to play fees, SoNoCC after school program opening). You’re the conduit for the status quo defenders in the school system, the feifdom-protectors noted by all the independent studies of the system (Cambridge, CREC 1 & 2, GE). That’s why your posts serve their purposes (undercutting or denigrating Manny Rivera, attacking most reform proposals, etc.).

    If the public really wants to know, they’ll ask these questions during the election, I suppose. The questions I get from the public cover topics like budgets, school improvement projects, school reforms, SPED, superintendent search, literacy efforts, etc. Other than you, there doesn’t seem to be anyone else raising these “inside baseball” questions about grant stipulations and consultant contracts.

    So I will remain focused on the big picture improvements to our school system, and let you focus on this comparative trivia. Did you notice that we just saved over $1 million regarding our bus contract arrangements tonight, ten times as much as you’re complaining about with this non-taxpayer funded consultant contract?

Leave a Reply

Secret Link