Quantcast
Advertisement

Norwalk Parking Authority eyes Wall Street’s impending parking woes

Norwalk Parking
Norwalk Parking Authority member Dick Brescia talks about Wall Street on Wednesday in the Maritime Garage.

NORWALK, Conn. – The development that seems certain for the Wall Street area is going to carry a surprise issue for Norwalk as the “empty space” that has plagued the area suddenly becomes “no space left” in terms of parking, Parking Authority member Dick Brescia said Wednesday.

Brescia led a discussion of Wall Street parking issues at the Parking Authority meeting, where Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Tim Sheehan also chimed in with concern.

“Spaces over time are going to begin to disappear,” Sheehan said. “The value of on-street parking and the garage parking is going to quickly escalate. Then the whole premise of what is being put forward is that we want to be in front of that and trying to incrementally advance that rather than being on the back end of it.”

Brescia explained some of this to his fellow Parking Authority members in a Wednesday email:

“When I started this project last fall, I was primarily looking for a way to suggest increasing revenue for the Yankee Doodle Garage.  Permit sales were the cash cow and transient revenue was mediocre… 17.5%.  Coming up with a recommendation to boost income by itself, not a difficult task.

“Unfortunately, I have found that nothing in the Wall Street area is “by itself’. While absorbing input from Mayor Rilling, Tim Sheehan, Kathryn Hebert, Hal Alvord and Stathis Manousos (of LAZ Parking), I discovered I could not deal with the YDG without bringing into consideration neighborhood business concerns, customer and resident concerns, on-street parking issues, POKO, Globe Theater, the Public Library-Post Office-Courthouse complex, and, of course, the city’s plans for revitalizing the entire area through The Norwalk Redevelopment Plan (approved by the Common Council in 2004).  With this crowded picture as a backdrop, here are some “numbers” based on some assumptions that I believe we should evaluate as a first step in finding near term and long term approaches to the parking problems.

GARAGE:

“The YDG has a capacity for 410 vehicles. The NPA projects that 238 of those spaces will be utilized for monthly permits … leaving 172 for transient users. I have toured the garage twice (a small sample) and found more than 150 spaces unused the first time and more than 100 the second).

ON STREET:

“It has been suggested that parking on the street is a contentious subject.  Some businesses and citizens want unlimited free parking … others think that the current 2-hour limit is not working because staffs of businesses are jockeying their cars around throughout the day to avoid ticketing (while taking up space that might be used by potential customers … I have not yet confirmed that premise with any of the business owners). Be that as it may, studies have shown that on-street parking meters are an effective way to create space turnover, which suggests that meters should be reconsidered for Wall Street.

“Assuming they will be added, here is an option we should be explore that may help solve multiple issues.

GARAGE:

“Set aside 100 spaces within YDG (we can start with a smaller number to test the waters) and offer them first to business owners for their employees or renters at an attractive monthly rate. Currently, any individual can park in the garage for a maximum rate of $4.00 per day (8A-6P) … that would equate to $20.00 per week on a MONDAY THRU FRIDAY basis or, $80.00 per month (YDG currently offers BUSINESSES a monthly rate of $37.00). I’m proposing that we offer Wall Street business owners a rate of $20.00 per month for their employees or renters (an average of less than $1.00 per day). This would free up spaces on the street and at the same time increase YDG revenue by $24,000 annually (100 spaces X $20 = $2,000 X 12 months).

ON STREET:

“Should on-street meters be employed, their rate … projected as $1.00 per hour … will be more expensive than garage parking ($0.75) encouraging parking at YDG as well as on-street “turnover”.

“These numbers (if they hold up to scrutiny) are only the first step in creating a NPA strategy.  Last year we discussed plans to “reach out” to businesses and customers in Norwalk to put a “face” on the NPA. The Wall Street area provides us an opportunity to reach out and involve business owners, customers and residents in the area to help us refine a plan for which they can take some ownership. We also need to engage with Redevelopment to obtain a long range perspective. If the YDG/On-street meter plan is successful, we may need to include the parking assets of Wall/Mechanic and Main/High to help develop a continuing strategy for solving area parking and citizens’ access needs.

“On the “access” issue, we already have pressure in the Wall Street-Belden Avenue section which houses the Post Office, Court House, Library and “new” Globe Theater … important locations for Norwalk citizens. I know the subject of a pedestrian walk-way from YDG to Wall Street has been discussed in the past. I believe this subject is worth revisiting. An easier access would not only be helpful to reach the four mentioned buildings, it may also be a positive for other merchants in the area.

“… The Public Library. I note in my study that we are charging this Norwalk asset $37.00 per space for 16 spaces per month. I believe we should do better than that … using the number I’ve suggested for Wall Street Garage/business owners might be a starting point. (please note that my wife is a member of the Board)

“A final thought…this memo is designed to PROMOTE DIALOGUE among us, fix the weaknesses that may have been overlooked and, importantly, set the stage for creating a calendar for “REACH OUT DIALOGUE” action.

The point, Brescia said, is partially that the Parking Authority needs to reach out and engage the Wall Street community, which should become a typical procedure throughout the city. People need to see that the “Authority” is just a group of Norwalk citizens volunteering to make the city better, he said.

“This Wall Street Redevelopment Plan, like a lot of the other redevelopment plans, the parking aspects are so critical to this,” Brescia said. “… The parking is shrinking and hopefully the growth here, we seem to be on the brink of seeing the Wall Street area come back and that’s the good news. The bad news is, where the hell are we going to put the people who are having to park? So we are into a situation which helps us to work hand in hand with Redevelopment as well as communicating with a segment of the community, the business owners the people who live there.”

“There has been a real concern on the Redevelopment Agency’s part that the … city has lacked attention to the parking in the Wall Street area,” Sheehan said, mentioning that the city has looked at parking lots as a way to leverage development. When and if POKO’s Wall Street Place comes to fruition, the Leonard Street parking lot will also go away, with implications for all of the businesses that are currently taking advantage of the lot, he said.

While POKO would have an automated garage, that type of parking doesn’t work for every business, Sheehan said. Everyone comes out of the movie theater at the same time and if they all go looking for their cars in that garage simultaneously, the wait would be an hour, he said.

It’s been a long time coming, but development is pushing its way up West Avenue; the Eagles lot on Mott Avenue has been sold and the developer is coming up with a plan that likely won’t include public parking, Sheehan said. The same developer also recently purchased the People’s Bank there and is likely to work on the same type of project there, Sheehan said.

“What we have kind of taken for granted as somewhat of an area that’s not having necessarily a huge demand is now beginning to ramp up very quickly with on-street and off-street demand,” Sheehan said. “I think that wave is coming at us that, all of a sudden, what we thought had a tremendous supply is going to become very crunched in quick period of time.”

“It’s going to be a space problem because there will be no space left. If we are ahead of curve, there may be near-term action we can take and always with a long-term thought in mind where this is going,” Brescia said.

“I think the sooner we can figure out what the authority’s direction is and then bring the city along with that…” Sheehan said. “Because it’s going to come quicker than we think it is, and I’d rather be ahead of the problem than on the back end of it, and all of the problems associated with that.”

Comments

12 responses to “Norwalk Parking Authority eyes Wall Street’s impending parking woes”

  1. Susan Wallerstein

    Songs good, admirable effort. Is Wall St. Task force involved? Thank goodness library now offers books!

  2. Susan Wallerstein

    CORRECTION (blaming iPad): Sounds good, admirable effort. Is Wall, St. task Force involved? Thank goodness library now offers EBOOKS.

  3. Tobias

    The NPA must be salivating at all the tickets they will be able to write in another section of town. Glad it’s getting developed. Too bad no one will go there from the fear if the wrath of parking tickets.

  4. Sara Sikes

    Mr. Brescia has done a helpful analysis. The main library could gain some parking spaces if the City negotiates that dedicated spaces be included in any building plan for Mott Avenue.

  5. EveT

    When will the public find out details about the Eagles lot on Mott Avenue and the People’s Bank on Belden? What is this developer proposing?

  6. Missy Conrad

    For so many years now, Everybody has been complaining about the lack of parking for our Public Library. Many of our residents go to our neighboring towns for access to a library. Last week a chain was put across the entrance to the People’s Bank Building parking lot on Mott Avenue! Norwalk has to finally resolve this to make some of the adjacent parking available for our community.

  7. Norwalker1

    The new Globe Theater will need 500 spaces when it opens, its capacity is about 1000 people.

  8. Don’t Panic

    @Norwalker1,
    Not if they use mall parking math!

  9. Michael McGuire

    I want to thank those volunteer members of the NPA for their service to Norwalk. With Wall Street now getting some long-needed attention I want to share with you some refinements of your ideas along with some new thoughts based on my professional experience as well as my 14 years as a business owner and building owner on Wall Street.

    The NPA should note that the Wall Street area is not likely to experience a parking shortage in the future even after full development. The only vacancies we have currently on Wall Street that need City parking are 84 and 104 Wall Street and Duleep’s Blight along with a few other small storefronts. That amounts to maybe 60,000 SF of space which needs 130-170 spaces depending on use. Note that I don’t add in the Globe Theater because its main traffic and parking generating use will be mostly after hours. Nor do I add in the Library as that should be addressed by taking land adjacent to the Library.

    Currently, the YD garage has the entire top level, roughly 125 parking spaces, leased by a local auto dealership to store cars. Even if we fill up all the vacant stores and POKO is built as planned we have an excess of well over 100 spaces in the YD garage alone (i.e. the auto storage spaces) during the daytime. And it’s virtually empty at night. Add in the Mechanic, Isaacs and Main Street lots – all underutilized and you can see we don’t need more parking.

    What we do need is a more thoughtful approach that is supportive of business and will grow the Grand List. Consider the following 5 business supporting changes and reasons why they make sense.

    1. Meters on the street are a necessity to generate any form of retail resurgence in a downtown area with moderate to high vertical density and serviced by City parking. Adding in angled parking and one-way would be a great benefit as well.

    The budding retail resurgence on Wall Street of the early 2000’s was choked off after Mayor Moccia had the meter heads cut off upon his election. The demise of this budding retail sector was not experienced overnight; instead it was long slow process that largely goes un-noticed by the untrained eye.

    When the meter heads were cut off the office workers and residents took to the “2 hour free parking” and shuffled around several times a day, which is bad for office productivity in and of itself. These employee’s and local residents essentially choked off customer parking sadly leaving Wall Street as the lowest rent retail district in SW Fairfield County.

    If the customer can’t access parking close by the retail store they won’t shop there. If we don’t address this now we will see our best remaining retailers leave to be replaced with low end retailers which will further cement the decline.

    2. Until a thriving retail market can re-establish itself on Wall Street the meter costs should not exceed $0.25/half-hour and allow two hour meter parking. To burden this area with higher parking fees will only delay retail revitalization.

    3. Understand that the people who pay for meter parking on the street are transacting business in Norwalk. Therefore, treat them as a “customer” and if they stay beyond the meter time give them a “premium parking fee” notice of no more than, say $3.00 for the next hour or so. The current format of $25 tickets is virtually the same as saying to them – we don’t want your business, go away and don’t come back.

    4. Create an inviting environment for office users. This increases economic activity, creates jobs, increase the Grand List, and makes for a vibrant downtown. To do this lower the monthly lot and garage rate to $10 or $15 for anyone wanting to park there (except for auto dealers looking to store vehicle such as is now the case with the entire upper level).

    Keep the garage/lot rate low up to the point where demand for monthly parking passes forces out the auto dealership storage use (note this could take several years or more). At that point you will know that Wall Street is now healthy enough to support raising parking rates in the garages and lots. Right now the $40+ out-of-pocket monthly fee gives potential tenants pause and dissuades new business from locating here.

    5. Have regular dialog with those you serve and pay the bills – the urban core businesses and property owners using the monthly passes. We are the ones who live with these policies day to day and are best source of real time data. This should be easy to invite our comments and suggestions since you contact most of us via e-mail anyway to charge us for the monthly passes.

    Finally, please understand that the current parking rates charged are a direct tax levied only on Norwalk’s most fragile commercial sector, namely the businesses and building owners of our urban core. The result is we have seen stagnating property values relative to surrounding towns, and less than vibrant commercial activity in our urban core since the inception of the NPA.

    For its part the CC should understand that while the “be self-sufficient” mandate for the NPA was well meaning, the unintended consequences have been very costly. It’s time to re-think how we do parking in Norwalk since the current cost for salaries and operating expenses alone seems excessively high at ~$2.7 million dollars.

  10. Sick and tired taxpayer!!!

    @Tobias, I agree with you 1000 percent!!!!! The NPA is to say the least is about as compassionate as a rabid coyote! Their pay stations at parking lots in SONO don’t always accept paper tender. With no sign of an attendant around to help you, you get a ticket. The only recourse you have is to pay the ticket because the NPA does not want to hear and they do not care. I know of other horror stories of the same nature pertaining to the NPA. Ahhhh, life in Norwalk.

  11. EveT

    @McGuire, please explain what you mean by “Nor do I add in the Library as that should be addressed by taking land adjacent to the Library.” What land?
    Also, pay-by-phone and credit card is fine for people who don’t want to carry coins, but paying with coins and bills should continue to be an option. It is extremely customer unfriendly to require phone or credit card. Some folks don’t care to give out their credit card numbers for minor purchases.

  12. Don’t Panic

    Hear, hear Eve T.

    Two quick additional thoughts. Mr. McGuire damages his credibility on issues of public policy by continuing to take public swipes at Ms Duleep at every opportunity. If blight enforcement leads to the seizure of her property, he should be precluded from purchasing it in any tax sale.

    Second, paid parking is a tax on the consumer, not the business. Many of these consumers already pay for these streets through their taxes. The Mushak rule applies here: if you can’t make a sufficient profit running your business here, feel free to sell and relocate. The license to run a business is a privilege, not a right.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link