Quantcast
Advertisement

Norwalk real estate is rebounding, agent tells BET

Norwalk BET 010514 134
Michael Church of William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty talks to the Board of Estimate and Taxation recently in City Hall.

 

NORWALK, Conn. – Westport’s real estate values have rebounded from the recession, while Norwalk and Wilton are lagging behind, with Wilton perhaps not doing as well as Norwalk, according to real estate broker Michael Church. Darien is in the middle, not as hot as Westport, not as bad as Wilton, but better than Norwalk; New Canaan isn’t doing quite as well as Darien.

Church, in being questioned by the Board of Estimate and Taxation (BET) recently, said that 603 Norwalk properties sold in 2007, 627 properties sold in 2013 and 595 sold in 2014. “We are in healthy place as far as transactions go. It was very difficult when you were having 400 transactions a year,” Church said. 

The crux of Church’s visit, BET member Anne Yang Dwyer said, was the intersection of real estate values with real estate taxes.  “The percentage one pays in real estate taxes is a big driver of why someone wants to live in a particular town,” Yang-Dwyer said. “I think people leave Norwalk for it being the value equation of living in Norwalk is more problematic, because of the relatively high real estate taxes. … We have to maintain discipline on where we are in real estate taxes.”

“I think all the elected officials in Norwalk would agree with you,” Mayor Harry Rilling said after Yang-Dwyer’s prolonged questioning on the matter. “I don’t know the point, but I think we all understand that. I think the interesting point is the home sales. People like to say, ‘Well, they’re moving out of Norwalk.’ Here you’re going back up to 627 units and 595 units and you’re finding, yes, some people are selling their homes or maybe staying in Norwalk, of moving out, but people are buying homes in Norwalk. People are staying in Norwalk and they’re moving to Norwalk, based on what you’re seeing right here.”

Rilling went on to say that the city would make an effort to market the positive side of Norwalk Public Schools, to reach potential home buyers.

Church, who was born and raised in Norwalk, is a real estate professional with William Pitt Sotheby’s International Realty. He sold more than 100 properties last year, with more than half in Norwalk, he said. He was the listing agent for Summerview Square and is a preferred relocation agent for Diageo, Xerox, Nielsen and GE.

“We are pretty much at the 2003 sales level as far as median sales price,” Church said. “We are still down about 27 percent for closed units, compared to the 2003 level anyhow. However, prices rebounded since our low in 2012.”

Yang-Dwyer asked how the relatively high taxes hurt Norwalk real estate sales.

“It’s difficult to quantify without polling everybody who is moving out or buying and chooses a different town to say exactly how much it affect Norwalk buyers,” Church said.

People moved to Fairfield County in the ’70s, ’80s and early ’90s because the taxes here were so much lower than Westchester County, Church said. But that value has dissipated. The trend now is to consider Westchester in preference of Norwalk and its surrounding towns, because the tax benefits have narrowed, and it’s less of a distance for commuting, Church said.

Yang-Dwyer wanted to know about the higher end of real estate properties for sale, many of which Church represents. The homes worth more than $1.5 million pay the bulk of Norwalk’s taxes, she said, wondering how Norwalk could get more homes that valuable.

There are people who would rather live in a smaller house in Greenwich because the taxes are lower, and taxes don’t go away, while a mortgage will eventually be paid off, Church said. Westport has a lot more inventory, with nothing worth less than $500,000, so the statistics are skewed, and like attracts like, which is why there are so many hedge fund managers in Greenwich, he said.

“I don’t know if that would be to Norwalk’s benefit to cater to that consumer,” Church said.

Asked what draws people to Norwalk, Church said, “It’s a very diverse section, depending who you are talking to. You can have country living up in Cranbury or Silvermine. You can have water living in Rowayton or East Norwalk, depending on what is your cup of tea. They also like the value of what they get in a house compared to a Westport, value per square foot, that type of thing.

“The difficulty generally relates to the taxes and the school system,” Church continued. “I try to, when speaking with folks, allay the fear that they have based on just looking on a website … of how those schools are ranked because it doesn’t tell the whole picture of what our schools offer and how good things are in the school system.”

Church said he has seen the success Norwalk schools can bring, as he and his brother went through them and his brother went to an Ivy League school.

“I actually would prefer this school system over the surrounding towns for diversity reasons, amongst others, the opportunities it offers.”

Rilling said he had had a meeting with real estate agents in his office, where the need to publicize the “real strides” the school system has made was discussed. The idea is to provide Realtors with handouts with a bullet-point list of the positives, he said.

BET member James Feigenbaum asked Church about Stamford.

Stamford has many dynamics – a downtown condo market, Harbor Point and North Stamford, “which would be our Wilton,” Church said. But as a broad stroke, “It has all the development that we’re just starting to see. It’s been going on there for years. It’s a little ahead bit ahead of us, as far as development. As far as the recovery, North Stamford is lagging. Shippan is doing fairly well,” Church said.

Commercial real estate was also touched upon. Those buyers are worried about their carrying costs, which are passed on to customers, so they naturally compare Fairfield to Westchester, he said. The big impediment for Bridgeport is the amount of taxes paid versus the return for the money in terms of benefits, he said.

Economic Development Director Elizabeth Stocker also chimed in.

“Norwalk has a really solid commercial base,” Stocker said. “I have conversations with folks who are Realtors of commercial properties. They talk to me all the time about how much properties are going for per square foot and what they have to charge their tenants, etc. We are really bumping up on that ceiling. It’s starting to get noticed. You are wise in recognizing that, in that we have to keep our taxes down to continue being competitive across the board.”

“Owners of commercial property can only pass so much along to their tenants because of vacancy rates in their area,” Church said. “It becomes a losing proposition, you can’t pass it along.”

Comments

13 responses to “Norwalk real estate is rebounding, agent tells BET”

  1. anon

    Taxes are bad, value for taxes is bad.

  2. John Hamlin

    The issue is what can our elected officials do to make our real estate values increase. It seems that improving the schools and keeping taxes low would be at the top of the list. But robust policing and keeping crime in check EVERYWHERE in town is important too — so support of the police is essential. Also maintaining infrastructure should be key. Making the city more attractive, particularly to young buyers, should be a priority– through good planning and development (yes, things like bike lanes and smart transportation will make our real estate values increase). But there are other things. For example, without a strong, effective blight ordinance the city is at a disadvantage compared to Stamford and other comparable municipalities with strong blight ordinances. No one wants to buy real estate in a town where the city won’t protect you from the heinous neglect of a few neighboring properties and where the rights of absentee slumlords trump the rights of resident property owners. I am sure others have ideas about what will increase property values and make Norwalk a destination for home buyers.

  3. Bill

    Rilling and Watts have no clue what will drive property values higher, they think giving police unnecessary promotions, hiring a fire chief based on filling a race quota, and having “real dems” on a BOE so they can look out for janitorial unions and corrupted interests are positives. These 2 need to work in the private sector and understand what drives value not unions.

  4. Taxpayer Fatigue

    The other problem that this realtor did not point out is that the market for properties over $400k is virtually at a standstill in Norwalk. If you follow the weekly property transactions listed in the paper, you will only see one or two properties sell each week for more than $400k, even though Norwalk has many properties that are valued at much more than $400k. If you have more than that to spend, the smart money will go to the surrounding towns where you have dramatically higher school ratings and test scores – a much less risky investment when you are spending over $500k.

    While I agree that Norwalk schools offer a good education in a diverse environment, it is a tough proposition to sell to potential real estate buyers that Norwalk schools are really okay when they consistently rank in the very low 70s percentile compared to the very high 90s percentile rankings of the surrounding towns student test scores. That is the same reason why North Stamford’s property sales are also low – Stamford’s school ratings are actually worse than Norwalk’s – better to buy in Greenwich or New Canaan than North Stamford.

    While the gap between Fairfield County and Westchester County may have narrowed a bit on property taxes, Westchester is still almost double Fairfield County property tax rates.

  5. Yankee Clipper

    No Norwalk real estate agent knows this guy … 100 deals? with who and where? There are better sources of info but he made some valid points

  6. piberman

    Curious that the “expert” did not present a table comparing City median home values with each of the surrounding 5 towns between 2003 and 2014. Curious that the City economic “expert” did not explain the causes of the sharply growing disparity between Stamford and Norwalk over the past decade. Curious that the “experts” did not present the sharp changes in City demographics over the past decade, declines in long term ownership and increase in rental housing available from Census data. But why quibble ? The BTE again demonstrated it lacks the capability to even conduct a knowledgeable inquiry of the comparative determinants of changes in city housing values. A BTE worthy of its name would have asked the City’s Economic Director to prepare a formal analysis of the determinants of changes in City residential properties. And the Director would have asked all the major City real estate agents for their knowledgeable inputs. But this is Norwalk where City officials just offer opinions on any subject without doing the hard analyses. The BTE here isn’t worthy of its name.

  7. Non partisan

    @ taxpayer- amen to para 1 and 2. I couldn’t agree more

    But para 3 comparison to ny tax rates I don’t agree. NY real estate taxes are hard to compare ( equalization rates, and multiple tax jurisdictions) and like fairfield cty there is a big difference between well run cities that also have minimal need based spending vs better run wealthier communities.

    Norwalk ct re tax is 1.7% market value
    Rye ny is 1.8% on new construction.

    The real difference is as a tax payer do you want to fund
    – enrichment programs in schools
    – ESL programs
    – community outreach centers
    – parks and recreation
    – day care and earlier childhood development
    – etc

    These are choices. People move to where the services they seek are offered. People don’t want to spend money on services they don’t need. It’s a delicate balancing act.

  8. Taxpayer Fatigue

    @Non Partisan – good points re Westchester towns are generally much better run with more services – you get what you pay for I guess. But in addition to the town taxes, you also have to include the county taxes to compare the total property tax bills. Is the Rye rate you cited inclusive of all County taxes, and then there is the Village of Rye taxes and the Town of Rye taxes….you have to compare the total property tax bill from all the multiple jurisdictions in Westchester to the single bill you get from the City of Norwalk for similar properties to have a fair comparison.

  9. Non partisan

    @taxpayer fatigue

    Yes – the rye ny 1.8% are for the city of rye and and are inclusive of city, county, and school taxes.
    It includes garbage pick up, sewer, parks, recreation, low crime rate, great schools and half the commute to NYC. Parking at night for dinner is free. Bustling safe downtown.

  10. Bill

    Good luck finding anything under a million in Rye. Bad comparison.

  11. Non partisan

    @ bill
    My daughter just looked at several 1 bedroom apartments for under 150k in rye.

    Bought a condo there for 110k and my first house for 300k.

    Want to improve property values and reduce you taxes at the same time? It’s a pretty easy formula.

  12. Bill

    @non-partison, maybe your daughter received some “workforce” housing subsidized 1 bedroom apt, but zillow shows nothing with 1 bedroom sold for under $170k in Rye. Maybe it was technically outside the rye school boundaries and that’s why it was only $110k.

    Agree with you wholeheartedly about lower taxes improving property values, but compare Rye to a similar socio-economic areas like New Canaan/Darien/Ridgefield/Weston/Westpot, and you will see Fairfield County beats Westchester County on taxes consistently.

    http://www.zillow.com/homes/recently_sold/Rye-NY/condo_type/47495_rid/priced_sort/41.013066,-73.589945,40.909491,-73.742723_rect/12_zm/

  13. Bill

    @non-partisan, also, your $300k first house was no doubt bought in the 80’s or 90’s, no chance it was bought in the last 10 years unless it was a rehab needing foreclosure, again, apples and oranges.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link