Quantcast
Advertisement

Opinion: From Hartford to Greece: Norwalk taxpayers deserve answers

In December 2019, Norwalk residents were presented with an extraordinary opportunity: a brand-new Norwalk High School with the State of Connecticut expected to pay 80% of eligible construction costs.

Standing at the announcement were State Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff, Mayor Harry Rilling, Superintendent Steven Adamowski and Kosta Diamantis—the powerful state official overseeing Connecticut’s school-construction program. Duff publicly thanked Diamantis for helping make the project possible.

Today, the project carries a $239 million budget.

And Kosta Diamantis is a convicted federal felon who fled to Greece rather than appear for sentencing after a jury found him guilty on 21 counts of bribery, extortion, conspiracy and lying to federal investigators involving school-construction contracting elsewhere in Connecticut.

That does not prove corruption occurred in the Norwalk High School project. But it should generate some very uncomfortable questions.

How did this extraordinary deal come together? Who first proposed replacing Norwalk High School? When did those conversations begin? Who was involved before the public announcement? What exactly did Diamantis do to help make the project possible?

What communications took place between Diamantis, Duff and Norwalk officials? And how did Norwalk secure an extraordinary 80% reimbursement rate—far above its usual reimbursement percentage? Duff’s own materials described the normal rate as 32.5%.

These aren’t conspiracy theories. They are reasonable questions about one of the largest public construction projects in Norwalk’s history. And there is another question taxpayers deserve answered: What is Norwalk actually paying?

We repeatedly hear “80% state reimbursement.” In 2024, officials said that reimbursement would save Norwalk taxpayers $138 million.

That’s great.

But taxpayers deserve the entire calculation. Eighty percent of what? Which costs qualify? Which don’t? How much additional money has Norwalk committed? How much has been borrowed? What will the interest and debt service cost?

And when every construction expense, non-reimbursable dollar and debt payment is counted, what is the true final cost to Norwalk taxpayers?

Put it on one page. No political speeches. No groundbreaking photographs. No victory laps.

Show taxpayers the numbers and release the records surrounding the creation of the deal.

If Diamantis’s involvement was entirely appropriate, transparency should strengthen public confidence. If the 80% reimbursement is the extraordinary taxpayer victory its supporters say it is, a complete accounting should prove it.

Norwalk deserves a modern high school. Our students deserve excellent facilities. But a $239 million building is not, by itself, an education.

Teachers educate children. Paraprofessionals support them. Special-education services, classroom programs, books, technology, arts and athletics educate them.

Capital construction and school operating budgets are separate funding streams—but students don’t learn in funding streams. They learn in classrooms.

Senator Duff has publicly celebrated this project and the unprecedented reimbursement. That’s precisely why the questions should be easy to answer.

Who conceived the deal? What exactly did Diamantis do? What communications took place? How was 80% secured? And what will Norwalk taxpayers ultimately pay?

The public does not need speculation. We need records. We need numbers. We need answers.

From Hartford to Norwalk and now all the way to Greece, this story has changed dramatically since 2019.

Open the books. Release the records. Follow the money. Answer the questions.

A school is more than steel girders and a shiny new facade. It is its students, its teachers, its programs—and the public trust behind every dollar spent.

Comments

8 responses to “Opinion: From Hartford to Greece: Norwalk taxpayers deserve answers”

  1. sue Haynie

    Norwalk’s last property tax increase was a whopper and this article asks some qreat questions, like “If the 80% reimbursement is the extraordinary taxpayer victory its supporters say it is, a complete accounting should prove it….what will Norwalk taxpayers ultimately pay?” Nancy on Norwalk, can you look into this?

  2. Bruce Kimmel

    If I remember correctly, at the time Norwalk’s reimbursement rate for NEW construction was about 22%; for major renovations it was about 33%. The 22% rate made it extremely difficult to build new schools in the city. The special 80% reimbursement for the high school was based on it being a multi-district facility that included P-Tech. As to the origins of the project, at the time building a new high school was not a priority of the BOE. Board members knew virtually nothing about the project until it was announced.

  3. John O’Neill

    Sue: I hate to break it to you, but you should expect similar tax increases for the next two years at a MINIMUM. Norwalk is basically
    stuck with some difficult decisions financially. The end result will not be pleasant to those of us who actually pay taxes. I just wish
    there was more transparency in the process. For those who plead for “just a few extra dollars per month” to allow BOE to expand
    without true supervision, I point out my taxes have gone up 40% in the last few years. AND increases will not end. While I’m not
    questioning Duff’s honesty, I am questioning his Math Skills. It should be pointed out Stamford (and a few other districts) got the
    80% reimbursement WITHOUT strings attached.
    Last point – The Board of Estimate and Taxation (BET) is the one group who actually watches spending. There are some on the
    City Council who would like to curtail their power…Why would you want to do that.

  4. Bryan Meek

    When this project ends up closer to $400 million we will have perennial double digit tax increases thanks to Bob Duff. My point of reference is the new Westhill HS. Westhill enrollment is a little larger, but not that much. That budget is $450 million. Our budget was crafted, in the dark, using 2019 assumptions. Tack on another 40% right there and we still do not know the full scope of abatement necessary. Doubtful we will get a $500 million taxpayer bailout like Duff helped get the city of Hartford for their irresponsible spending.

    We are screwed and worse, the kids who had terrible middle school experience due to covid had to suffer their entire high school careers in a construction zone just so Duff could have a photo op. The new school will not have any assigned rooms for teachers. 100% will be on carts. What a recruiting tool.

    This fiasco and more will happen as long as Duff and team have a compliant press that will not cover these issues.

  5. Colin Hosten

    One of my favorite things about the Norwalk High School construction is how transparent the process has been from the very start. From meetings of the Council’s Land Use and Building Management Committee where even Republican Councilmembers (when we used to have those) pushed back on approving things like plumbing fixes and ADA upgrades because it amounted to throwing good money after bad, to the discussions at the state level that led to the creation of P-Tech as an inter-district magnet, to the very public passage of the bill that approved the construction of the new school with the state paying 80% of the cost. Also very transparent was the investigation of Kosta Diamantis that explicitly stated that he never pressured anyone in Norwalk to use specific contractors.

    None of this has been hidden or secret. In fact, at the September meeting of the Council’s Land Use and Building Management Committee, and at the committee’s request, Alan Lo presented a comprehensive and detailed breakdown of the costs of the new school construction from the beginning of plans being approved through the current day and future estimates. That was a public meeting that anyone can watch from start to finish online (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjeyhfrPw9s) but I don’t know that anyone on the RTC is interested in watching. This very “opinion” letter states that there is no data to “prove corruption occurred in the Norwalk High School project. But it should generate some very uncomfortable questions.”

    The questions are not uncomfortable, or they shouldn’t be, if the answers are easy to find. But they’re meant to be provocative, to create suspicion and innuendo, just shy of saying anything outright false. That’s certainly a political strategy, I guess, and it might be what I would do if I didn’t have any productive solutions to offer to Connecticut voters. But even as a Democrat, I long for the return of the day when Republicans can have discussions and even disagreements without resorting to just flat out making things up and pointing fingers to create unverified and unsupported accusations.

    If the RTC has questions, the answers are right here hiding in plain sight. Instead of writing unsubstantiated Op-Eds, attend a Council or BOE meeting sometime. You just might learn something.

  6. Bryan Meek

    To date there have been no full accounting provided on how much money has been spent, how much has been reimbursed, and how much more needs to be spent. It’s the single largest project in the entire history of the city and no one knows or cares to tell taxpayers the true costs.

    This is what the Democrat leadership calls transparency. Then they want us to believe that Kostas would only put his hand in other cookie jars when the magnitude of the project would have been even easier to capitalize on. Give me a break.

    Kostas was fired and put under investigation in 2021. The Democrat super majorities still voted to go ahead with the project knowing this and knowing that the 2019 price estimate was a pure fiction. It should have been put on hold, allowing the city finances to catch up and other more critical projects to move forward.

    This city can’t even manage a simple drainage project right next to city hall within four years and 200% cost overruns. We are so screwed.

  7. Bryan Meek

    I watched the meeting and if you go back to previous meetings you can hear my comments about how outrageous it was that we had no full accounting of the project.

    Next, I think you have highlighted the Real problem here in this city that transcends this project.

    The meeting did not disclose a full accounting nor anywhere close to rudimentary reporting of basic data. It was high level estimates.

    If the DTC leadership thinks those were actually financials then it goes a long way in explaining perennial double digit tax increases while the rest of the city’s infrastructure can’t keep up with demands. Holding your thumb up to the horizon is no way to manage $500 million in spending.

  8. Patrick Cooper

    Bryan – imagine the delusion – or the will to distract. Colin has proven a very useful tool in the local DTC shed. Imagine saying with a straight face: “One of my favorite things about the Norwalk High School construction is how transparent the process has been from the very start”. This, right after the comment from the then BOE chair – Bruce Kimmel (I give him credit for his honesty) – “As to the origins of the project, at the time building a new high school was not a priority of the BOE. Board members knew virtually nothing about the project until it was announced”.

    One thing is not like the other.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link