Quantcast
Advertisement

Opinion: Malloy’s transit land-grab

Jim Cameron
Jim Cameron

Former NBC News director and anchor, now a professional communications consultant, Jim Cameron leads workshops on media training, speech and presentations skills and preps clients for analyst briefings and legislative testimony. He served for 19 years on the CT Metro-North Rail Commuter Council, is an elected member of the Darien Representative Town Meeting (RTM) and is program director of Darien TV79, his town’s government TV station.

Don’t look now, but Gov. Malloy’s trying to take your land, or at least control of the land around your local train or bus station.

When the CDOT recently tried to shove a private development down the throats of Stamford under the guise of Transit Oriented Development in replacing the garage at the train station, city fathers were justifiably upset. They voted through a zoning change giving them some say on the project, as well they should.

As revenge Gov. Malloy is now proposing a statewide Transit Corridor Development Authority (TCDA) that would bigfoot the towns and cities, giving the state control over land, buildings and development within a half-mile of all transit stations.

Your favorite coffee shop across from your Metro-North stop could be torn down and replaced with offices. Parking lots could be enlarged with fees set by the CDOT, not the towns where the lots reside. If the state wants to erect a building taller than local zoning laws allow, too bad… they can and will. As one critic described it, this is “eminent domain on steroids.”

The TCDA would be run by political appointees, a majority controlled by the governor and not answerable to the local residents whose land would be affected. The agency could issue its own bonds financed by rents and taxes on the very structures they want built. And the agency would continue with this power forever, under “perpetual succession.”

The TCDA would have the power to condemn property that it alone claims it needs to further its goals. Town and regional planning and zoning boards can just go pound sand, powerless to stop them.

Because train and stations are usually in the downtown of cities and towns, those municipalities would lose control of the development destiny of their very core. The governor’s bill would have us believe that Hartford, or this new agency of political hacks, knows what’s best for us, not our elected mayors and first selectmen.

It’s been proven that the private developer chosen for the Stamford garage project just happened to have donated $165,000 to the State Democrats before and after his selection. Yet, there’s nothing in the governor’s TCDA bill (HB 6851) to prevent such “pay for play” activities.

Were Dannel Malloy still mayor of Stamford he would scream bloody murder if a bill like this was introduced in Hartford. But as governor he seems to have no qualms at telling 169 towns and cities in this state that he knows best… that Hartford will determine if skyscrapers built by private developers should be plopped down in your town and mine.

Transit Oriented Development makes sense and should be encouraged. We all need to promote housing and commercial growth focusing on our train and bus stations. But this is a local issue, not a state right.

If we are to preserve the local identity and feel of our communities, we must stop the Governor’s land grab and keep control of our destiny. Tell your state representative and state senator you oppose HB 6851 and Malloy’s land-grab.

Comments

4 responses to “Opinion: Malloy’s transit land-grab”

  1. Oldtimer

    There could be some benefit for a state agency to have some influence, but not control, of development near transit facilities, if there was was State financing offered to local property owners. The idea of a transit district zone, controlled by the state, rather than the local community is a non-starter. Some of the bigger cities, like Norwalk, might even see an infusion of state money to jump start locally desired development. Would 95/7 be eligible for help with financing in exchange for some state input on what gets built there ?

  2. diane c2

    No surprise that Bob Duff is among the sponsors of this bill. He sat by and did absolutely nothing as the state marched in like dictators and took 3 privately owned Norwalk properties next to the East Norwalk train station. Among them, the home of an 84-year old widower, an Italian immigrant, who was tormented endlessly by the state to give them his home of 40+ years, ordered not to take his autumn trip to see his grandchildren in Italy, and who shortly thereafter fell ill with cancer and died, even as the state goons hovered like vultures waiting for his death, and his property.

    AN ACT ESTABLISHING THE CONNECTICUT TRANSIT CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.

    To implement the Governor’s budget recommendations.

    Introduced by:
    Rep. J. Brendan Sharkey, 88th Dist.
    Rep. Joe Aresimowicz, 30th Dist.
    Sen. Martin M. Looney, 11th Dist.
    Sen. Bob Duff, 25th Dist.

    1. Mark Chapman

      @Diane C2

      Duff explains he in not a sponsor. As majority leader, he is part of the legislative team that, as a courtesy, traditionally introduces bills from the governor. The governor is not allowed to introduce his own bills in the General Assembly. Whether the senator becomes a sponsor if the bill progresses is an open question.

  3. diane c2

    Mark, if you’d like, you may amend my comment to reference Sen. Duff and an “introducer” of the bill…

Leave a Reply

Secret Link