Quantcast
Advertisement

Opinion: Norwalk’s Democratic Party diversity should be its strength, not its weakness

Bruce Kimmel
Bruce Kimmel

Bruce Kimmel is a Democrat and an at-large member of the Common Council.

Norwalk is a fascinating combination of urban, suburban and rural communities. We have rivers, the Long Island Sound, and lovely beaches. Our parks are beautiful and well kept, our woodlands are in excellent shape. Plus, how many cities can claim to have been almost burned to the ground during the Revolutionary War by the British? We are as geographically diverse as a city can be.

Moreover, our population could not be more diverse. We have a variety of racial and ethnic groups; our residents come from every income group; and we have a healthy combination of elderly and very young people. This diversity is clearly Norwalk’s greatest strength and should be valued and preserved.

But our demographic diversity can also be our greatest weakness. It often makes for a kind of rough-and-tumble politics that can spiral out of control. Naturally, we have the standard mix of Democratic and Republican perspectives, with the usual debates along the usual lines. But in Norwalk, at least from my viewpoint as a member of the Norwalk Common Council and as a former member of the Board of Education, local politics are often a lot more complicated than one might expect.

This is especially true for the Norwalk Democratic Party, whose members reflect the racial/ethnic diversity of the city, as well as our economic diversity. To me, it’s long been obvious that this diversity among the Democrats is not only our greatest strength, but at times can be our greatest weakness – as different priorities and perspectives clash, as different and equally legitimate views of the world collide in the normal course of legislative activity.

(For the record: Over the years I have on occasion been smack-dab in the center of these party brouhahas, and I am acutely cognizant of the fact that a number of local Democrats are critical of past decisions I’ve made; decisions that may not have been in the best interests of the local party, but were made – as an elected official – with the best interests of the city firmly in mind.)

Unfortunately, for the past few years, these political and intellectual collisions – which have involved members of both parties – seem to have caused more damage than in the past. Compounding this problem is a level of legislative ineptitude that is embarrassing; for instance, a willingness to ignore state collective bargaining laws, opposing federal grants earmarked for South Norwalk, and even voting against funding a much-needed after-school program.

Harsh accusations of backroom deals with not a shred of supporting evidence have been made in full public view; impugning the character of political opponents with wild innuendos is now common; and name-calling has become a regular feature of meetings. Even Mayor Rilling has been trashed several times by a member of his own party at Council meetings. Not only have our elected and appointed officials been emotionally hurt, but frustration levels may be at an all-time high, and I would not be surprised if some folks decided not to run for re-election.

Now is the time to dial back the rhetoric. Losing a vote or a series of votes is no cause to attribute malicious intent onto the shoulders of the majority. Regularly losing votes to an elected majority should never become a rationale for slinging not-so-subtle suggestions of bias or calling people liars. A few years back, several Council members were called “corrupt” and “pay to play” politicians by a disgruntled member who did not like the outcome of a vote.

From 1997-2001, I was part of a diverse caucus of only four Democrats on the Common Council. We had major differences with the majority on a host of issues. And we lost every single contested vote during that period. But we continued to fight for what we believed in, at the committee level and in the full Council. More importantly, I can’t recall a single instance when a member of our small caucus publicly accused a member of the majority of anything resembling the hurtful nonsense that is fast crippling government in Norwalk.

In recent months, much has been said about the need to attract more competent candidates for our elected and appointed commissions and agencies. Many residents have been in utter disbelief and shocked after witnessing or reading about what’s been happening at City Hall. Fortunately, an election is approaching. I can’t think of a better time to again make our political diversity our greatest strength.

Comments

23 responses to “Opinion: Norwalk’s Democratic Party diversity should be its strength, not its weakness”

  1. Kevin Di Mauro

    This opinion by Bruce Kimmel seems to be more of a call to replace certain minority members of the Common Council rather than a call for more diversity.

    With regard to his statement that there is “a level of legislative ineptitude that is embarrassing”, it should be noted that Norwalk has what’s known as a Common Council, not a Legal Council.

    1. Mark Chapman

      @Kevin Di Mauro

      While I won’t venture into the realm of your or Mr. Kimmel’s opinion, I will offer these facts:

      The Common Council is the law-writing body of the City of Norwalk. The city’s charter gives certain administrative powers exclusively to the Council and others jointly to the Council and Mayor. Agendas are available to the public prior to meetings. — Norwalk, CT – Official Website – Common Council http://www.norwalkct.org/index.aspx?nid=286Norwalk

      legislate
      verb leg·is·late \ˈle-jəs-ˌlāt\
      : to make laws

      : to control, create, or cause (something) by making laws
      Also…
      INEPTITUDE
      : the quality or state of being inept; especially : incompetence

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legislate

      I believe what Mr. Kimmel is saying is there are members of the Common Council who do not understand laws, contracts and/or budgets, all of which affect Norwalk’s taxpayers and all of which are voted on by the Council.

  2. Kevin Di Mauro

    @Mark

    I understand what you are saying , but I think the legally inept should have a voice in the decisions of Norwalk’s government especially if they own property and pay property taxes. May God bless those who do not understand laws, contracts and/or budgets and still try to do what’s right.

    1. Mark Chapman

      @Kevin

      Everyone, legally inept or not, has a right to an opinion and to vote in November, and to question their city officials. People who do not understand the laws, contracts and budgets should NOT be holding office, and the voters need to know who is doing what. If Mr. Kimmel, who has been involved for years in many capacities, wants to give his opinion, I welcome it, as I would welcome same from Doug Hempstead and any number of veteran city officials of all stripes.

  3. LWitherspoon

    “…especially if they own property and pay property taxes.”

    In David Watts we have a Common Council member who has thousands of dollars in unpaid property taxes going back to 2012. Mr. Watts is also the disgruntled council member who made the “corrupt” and “pay to play” remarks. Let’s hope that after the next election, Mr. Watts’s district is represented by someone who prioritizes Norwalk ahead of his/her own self-promotion.

  4. Kevin Di Mauro

    @Mark

    How much do you think Eloisa Melendez understands laws, contracts and budgets?

    1. Mark Chapman

      @Kevin

      It is my understanding from Nancy, who sits through all of these meetings (Council and many committee meetings as well as BoE and many other commissions), that Ms. Melendez is a very engaged council person who reads her packets, does her research, reaches out to experienced people on both sides of the aisle and makes her decisions. Sometimes she votes with the majority, sometimes with the minority. But she seems to do her homework.

  5. Gordon Tully

    I would note a general breakdown of broad perspective at all levels of society. People, especially in the U.S., seem increasingly to rely on narrow-focus and often single-issue media, ideas and affiliations, just when it is more than ever essential to take a broad view.

    I would also note the political mirror-image of Democrats and Republicans at the local and national levels. Local Republicans seem rock-solid, while nationally they are fragmenting; meanwhile, local Democrats can’t agree on the time, while nationally they have already anointed their presidential candidate.

    When I put these two observations together, I become more humble about trying to figure out what is going on in our city and country.

  6. Kevin Di Mauro

    Thanks Mark for the reply. I have no doubt that Ms Melendez is a very conscientious person, however until she has first hand experience at raising a family, owning property, and having to pay property taxes, sending a child through school, etc, etc, etc, I probably will have more respect for the other minority Council Members including David Watts.

  7. Casey Smith

    Mr. DiMauro – I’m not sure why you’re attacking Ms. Melendez on the basis that she is single without children, but if you truly rank some other Council Members over her because of these factors, I pity you.

    You mentioned having children. Has that become a new requirement for Council? If so, then there may be others who end up disqualified.

    Let’s see…you mentioned paying taxes. Ooo-kay, that could affect at least two sitting Council members that I know about. Sure you want to go down that road?

    Admittedly, owning property puts more skin in the game, but even so, I’d vote for someone who actually was informed about the issues rather than someone who arrives late for meetings, asks inane questions and is rude to the staff.

    Yes, Ms. Melendez is young. But even so, I woud bet a lot of money that she has a better working knowledge of how the Council and the City administration works than many, many, many tax paying, property owning Norwalk residents with children in the school system. And that shouldn’t be brushed away lightly.

  8. Kathleen Montgomery

    Well said Casey.

    Kevin: ” I have no doubt that Ms Melendez is a very conscientious person, however until she has first hand experience at raising a family, owning property, and having to pay property taxes, sending a child through school, etc, etc, etc, I probably will have more respect for the other minority Council Members including David Watts”.

    Could you elaborate on why being conscientious, being prepared, doing research on issues, reaching out to others for information does not trump the record of David Watts?

  9. Amanda

    Casey, thank you for your comment.

    Kevin, your comments are downright offensive for us “middle age” childless tax-paying citizens. Apparently having a family and putting a child through the school system legitimizes being an adult and responsible/insightful citizen of Norwalk in your eyes.

    Ms. Melendez has my vote over other non tax-paying council members.

  10. Kevin Di Mauro

    @Amanda

    Who are the non tax-paying council members you are referring to?

    If you mean David Watts, as far as I know his property has not needed to be auctioned to satisfy any unpaid tax debt. He must be paying enough taxes to satisfy the tax collector. Property taxes in Norwalk are excessive. As a childless, tax-paying, senior citizen I can easily sympathize with anyone having difficulty paying their property taxes.

  11. Casey Smith

    Okay, Kevin –

    I just spent a productive 15 minutes searching ALL the Council Members names at the Tax Collector’s website. Yes, there are two Council Members who have taxes in arrears. I’m not going to embarrass anyone by announcing their names on the blog, so if you want to know who they are, well then, here’s the link to the Tax Collector’s department.

    http://my.norwalkct.org/eTaxbill//

    As to Mr. Watts not having his property included in the Tax Sale or having it in foreclosure, you seem to think that means it’s okay not to pay one’s taxes. The IRS would probably have something to say about that.

    I guess in one aspect, you are correct because when the taxes are delinquent, there are fines attached and in the long run, it means more money for the City.

    HOWEVER, even that is not a justification for not paying one’s bills on time, especially if one is an elected official of the City. The old adage that actions speak louder than words comes into play here.

  12. Kevin Di Mauro

    @Casey Smith

    Haven’t you ever had trouble paying your bills on time?

    Stuff happens, even to elected officials of the City.

  13. MollyB

    Watts, has done a great job for the city- working on behalf of poor and middle-class people. He has to be the most talked about and the most trolled on the common council. Dave is a true champion for the underserved and you folks know it!

    God Bless you, Watts! You will be missed!

  14. Casey Smith

    Mr. DiMauro –

    1.) This isn’t about me. Like many other people in this city, have struggled with having too little money and too many bills at the end of the month. Been there, done that and have the t-shirt. However, I am not an elected City official. So, trying to deflect the issue back on me and making me defend myself doesn’t qualify.

    2.) Sadly, I first heard about these two situations YEARS ago and quite frankly, was somewhat surprised to find that the delinquencies were still on the books. The Council Members involved should either just pay up, go to adjudication or resign.

  15. Kevin Di Mauro

    I disagree with your comments regarding the two council members that have delinquencies, and I hope you won’t consider that to be an attack or a deflection.

    As I mentioned previously, I think the taxes in Norwalk are way too high, and I can’t think of better people to represent me on the Common Council especially when deciding if a million dollar debt on a restaurant at Oak Hills Park should be forgiven or if millions of tax-payer dollars should be spent to build a golf driving range at Oak Hills.

  16. Casey Smith

    Kevin – You are free to agree or disagree as you so choose.

    Just went back to check and it appears that one of the outstanding amounts owed by one of the Council members has been paid. However, both Council Members still owe back taxes and both those amounts are under $500.

    From what I understand, Norwalk has a tax collection rate that is up there in the 98% neighborhood, thanks to those who do pay their taxes.

    Regarding million dollar debts for the restaurant and driving range, which really has nothing to do with whether or not one should pay their taxes, the largest portion of the City’s financial budget does not involve the golf course, or the restaurant. The actual impact on taxes would not even show up on the radar if they were totally removed.

    The largest portion of the City budget goes to the Board of Education, which is State mandated. Last time I looked, the BOE was the largest employer in Norwalk, too. The BOE budget would be followed by Pensions and Benefits for City Employees, which are contractual. I think the next largest categories would be Salaries, and then either DPW or Parks and Rec. Oak Hills would be very close to the bottom of the list in the grand scheme of things. I’m pretty sure the budget is posted online, so you could easily check it out.

    But once again, let me point out, that the issue isn’t about Oak Hills restaurant, a driving range that doesn’t exist, the Common Council votes or the mill rate. It’s about elected officials paying their taxes.

  17. Kevin Di Mauro

    @Casey Smith

    If the issue is really about elected officials paying their taxes then maybe you should inform Bruce Kimmel, the guy who wrote this fake OpEd regarding diversity in Norwalk’s Democratic Party.

  18. Casey Smith

    Kevin – On May 26, 2015 at 7:38 pm you posted the following statement:

    “I think the legally inept should have a voice in the decisions of Norwalk’s government especially if they own property and pay property taxes.”

    It wasn’t until the following day, May 27, 2015 at 10:06 am, that I replied and cautioned you about the tax issue along with my statements in support of Ms. Melendez.

    On May 28, 2015 at 10:20 am, you mentioned Mr. Watt by name and referenced his tax status. I believe it was your statements that became the basis for the exchange we have engaged in on the blog.

    Mr. Kimmel’s OpEd piece is exactly what he states it to be…his opinion. Over the years, I’ve spoken with Mr. Kimmel about a variety of different topics and never known him to prevaricate. Mr. Kimmel is one of the rare individuals that says what he means and means what he says. If he wishes to weigh in on any of my statements, I would wholeheartedly welcome whatever he would have to say.

  19. Kevin Di Mauro

    @Casey Smith

    I believe it is Bruce Kimmel’s fake OpEd that is the basis for the exchange we’ve been having.

    The title of his opinion is, “Norwalk’s Democratic Party diversity should be its strength not its weakness”. If this is the topic of discussion, I don’t know why he would make the statement, “Compounding the problem is a level of legislative ineptitude that is embarrassing; for instance, a willingness to ignore state collective bargaining laws, opposing federal grants earmarked for South Norwalk, and even voting against funding a much-needed after-school program”. Although he does not mention any names, this statement and others that follow are clearly a harsh criticism of the minority members of the council that he repeatedly disagrees with.

    A more truthful title for this opinion letter might have been, “Norwalk’s Democratic Party MINORITY should be its strength not its weakness”, according to Bruce Kimmel, but that probably would have been to real for Bruce.

  20. Casey Smith

    Kevin –

    I’m sorry, but Bruce will have to address your issue, not me. I can’t presume to speak for him. Hopefully, he’ll see your comment and respond.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link