Quantcast
Advertisement

Project manager updates Norwalk crowd on plans for Walk Bridge project

NORWALK, Conn. – Residents and business owners filled City Hall’s Community Room Tuesday night to hear a presentation on how the Walk railroad bridge will either be rebuilt or replaced, with construction tentatively scheduled to begin in 2017 and lasting 36 to 54 months.

Led by Christian Brown, the project manager from the engineering firm the state has selected to design the project, the program included descriptions of the types of bridges that might replace the existing 119-year-old structure, as well as how it might be reconstructed so it could remain in service.

In either case, the project is expected to cost as much as $600 million, with funding coming from both the state and the federal government.

The bridge carries Metro-North’s New Haven Line and Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor trains over the Norwalk River, and runs between East and South Norwalk. It has recently been plagued by mechanical problems that, in May and June 2014, caused the shutdown of rail traffic for several hours.

Brown, of HNTB Corporation in Kansas City, Mo., said the project must result in a structure that has “reliable performance – one that you can count on to open and close safely and in a predictable manner.”

He said the new or rebuilt bridge must be resistant to severe storms, such as Hurricane Sandy, as well as seismic events, and must be able to maintain railroad and water use to the greatest extent possible.

Two markedly different options for the Norwalk Walk Bridge replacement, presented by
Two markedly different options for the Norwalk Walk Bridge replacement, presented by Connecticut Department of Transportation officials Tuesday in City Hall.

During the conceptual engineering phase, Brown said, his firm considered more than 70 feasible options before deciding on five structural designs that could replace the bridge, with reconstruction being the sixth alternative under consideration.

Adding to the difficulty in the planning is the need for the railroads to continue using at least a portion of the existing bridge while construction is in progress, and for maritime traffic to continue to be able to get past the bridge. In its current design, the bridge swings on a turntable to enable passage of tall vessels.

Brown said that, throughout construction, two tracks will remain in service.

The project also must allow for the continued operation of businesses that are in close proximity to the bridge. And consideration is being given to where construction materials and vehicles will be stored during the project.

Brown said construction would occur in sequences, and some portions of the bridge would probably be built away from the immediate site and then transported to the location when ready.

James A. Fallon, manager of facilities and transit for the state Department of Transportation, said barges may be used to transport portions of the bridge constructed elsewhere to the site.

Brown said the goal is to complete construction in 2020.

Continually updated information about the project can be found at walkbridgect.com.

Comments

3 responses to “Project manager updates Norwalk crowd on plans for Walk Bridge project”

  1. Maritime Yards Condo Owner

    Any impact to the depth of the channel during low tide compared to now (i.e., will some of the shore-oriented options have a less effective span because of water depth)? Also, redundancy was mentioned in the beginning, but I did not see a design with two lift points – is that a goal? Any option to simply modernize the existing system (mentioned in article but not in the video)? Also, is there such thing as a modern swing design and why was it not a top option? Seems like some good thought and open dialogue going into this project early.

  2. sofaman

    MYCO: There was a very good presentation, and in the interest of time, and the fact that we are not engineers capable of judging the pro’s / cons of various configurations, not every of the 70 types of bridges the engineering team looked at, was presented. Having said that, I too was curious why a swing type wasn’t at least presented. Two take-aways:

    1. There are definitely “refurbishing” options on the table. However, given the cost/time factors involved, it seemed as if there was already a strong argument towards a complete replacement. Which honestly, seems like the way to go given that another 100 year life span is a goal.

    2. I believe all new/replacement configurations allowed a greater pass-under clearance than the current bridge.

  3. Harold Cobin

    The primary form of redundancy in all the proposed designs is that the bridge would be split lengthwise into two spans, with two tracks on each span. Each span could be lifted/closed independently.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link