Quantcast
Advertisement

Sources: Alvord out as DPW director

Norwalk Department of Public Works Director Hal Alvord discusses potholes at the recent East Norwalk Mayor's Night Out.
Norwalk Department of Public Works Director Hal Alvord discusses potholes at the recent East Norwalk Mayor’s Night Out. Alvord will be leaving his post later this month, according to multiple sources.

Updated 4:36 p.m. Thursday, May 14, comments from Common Councilman David McCarthy (R-District E)

NORWALK, Conn. – Longtime Norwalk Department of Public Works Director Hal Alvord is leaving his position at the end of the month, according to a source in City Hall. The source said the 70-year-old Alvord’s retirement was not his own idea.

Mayor Harry Rilling has so far declined comment except to say he will be issuing a statement, and NoN’s attempts to contact Alvord have been unsuccessful thus far.

Common Councilman David McCarthy (R-District E), chairman of the Council’s Public Works Committee and an Alvord ally, spoke with NoN about the situation Thursday afternoon.

“I was informed that Hal would be leaving at the end of the month. I believe he has accrued vacation and what have you so that he will actually be done as of end of this week,” McCarthy said.

Other Council members declined to comment Wednesday, citing courtesy to Rilling. McCarthy confirmed Alvord’s departure to The Hour on Wednesday. “I am willing to speak on anything that I know about,” McCarthy said, explaining that he was asked for a reaction to what the reporter said he already knew.

The best words he could come up with to describe his reaction was “disappointed and sad,” he said.

“I think that, looking back on things, I mean, everyone has disagreements, but in the larger context what I have seen of Hal is that he was key in saving the city $18 million through the introduction of the single-stream recycling program and the garbage outsourcing,” McCarthy said.

Alvord’s future with Norwalk has been in doubt for months, according to another City Hall source who requested anonymity, but things were on hold for reasons that could not be revealed.

Alvord has twice been the subject of “no-confidence” votes – six years apart – by the public employee union, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 2405, which criticized his management style.

In June, Local 2405 President Milt Giddiens laid out the union’s complaints about Alvord.

“The concerns we expressed back then are the same ones we have now,” Giddiens said. “Mr. Alvord’s and Ms. (Lisa) Burns’ abusive and heavy-handed tactics are disrespectful to front-line workers and have created a poisonous work environment. We have had a long-standing practice of working to provide the best and fastest service to Norwalk citizens, which is apparently the least of Mr. Alvord’s concerns. Hopefully Mayor Rilling will listen to what we have to say.”

Local 2405 Vice President Hector DeJesus added, “If Mr. Alvord and Ms. Burns can’t respect the employees they supervise, then how can they respect Norwalk taxpayers? Things have to change.”

Burns is the DPW operations manager.

“I don’t think it would be appropriate for me to comment since there has been no official comment from the mayor,” AFSCME (American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees) Council 4 spokesman Larry Dorman said Wednesday night. “ … But certainly we have had issues and concerns with Mr. Alvord. To date, he has neither inspired nor facilitated a positive work environment that’s operated in the best interests of not only of the employees but of the Norwalk taxpayers. That’s an ongoing concern we have had.”

In May 2014, Alvord was pressed over what Councilman David Watts called a $273,000 no-bid contract with City Carting to buy three new trash compactors.

Alvord also has been a target of former Zoning Commissioner and Bike/Walk Task Force Co-Chairman Mike Mushak for his opposition to Bike/Walk Task Force plans for bike lanes and walking trail work. Mushak also took Alvord and McCarthy to task over issues surrounding the lowering of the road under the Rowayton railroad bridge and related work.

Last July, Alvord emphatically stated that there was no room on Belden Avenue for bike lanes, that installing them would be dangerous and that DPW Engineers did not relish the idea of testifying in court against the city if a tragedy occurred.

The Norwalk Traffic Authority consulted with the Connecticut Department of Transportation and Office of State Traffic Administration. Bike lanes were installed.

“The way I look at that was his opinion based on traffic standards,” McCarthy said. “Unfortunately I think there’s some amount of opinion in there, for lack of better word, that it doesn’t say ‘exactly this amount of space to have bicycle lanes.’”

McCarthy, a veteran bike rider, said he thinks there could eventually be a serious accident there, with serious injuries or even a fatality.

“I don’t think he was incorrect,” McCarthy said. “The fact that the state let it go through means that somebody said, ‘OK there’s a certain guideline’ and let it happen, but I don’t know that a person at the state said, ‘Oh, it’s 100 percent safe.’”

Recently, Common Council members have appeared to be frustrated in their desire to begin repairing Norwalk sidewalks. Alvord has been talking about DPW being shorthanded, as two principal engineers were retiring. Dick Linnartz had his last day on May 1, and Brian Sweeney agreed to stay on through the fall.

Alvord fought single-stream recycling when the idea was put forward by activist Diane Lauricella, according to Councilman Bruce Kimmel, a Public Works Committee member, but came on board once it was combined with outsourcing trash collection to City Carting. That contract turned out to be winner for outsourcing proponents, saving Norwalk millions over the life of the deal, a fact confirmed by Finance Director Tom Hamilton.

“I have proof that Mr. Alvord actually delayed us going to single-stream recycling by at least two years,” Lauricella said. “I am still calculating the volume of materials that taxpayers paid for at the full trash rate, it’s tons and tons and he actively pursued delaying single stream recycling until such time that his contractor was ready to embrace it, and there’s proof of it.”

McCarthy said that if that happened was before his involvement with the Public Works Committee.

Alvord was very good about trees in Norwalk and worked very well with certain citizens on that issue, Lauricella said. But he misrepresented things, such as the odors from the sewage treatment plant.

“That kind of public official is not welcome in Norwalk anymore,” Lauricella said. “… I can’t imagine the reason he felt he needed to misinform public officials about something so obvious.”

“(Alvord) has also brought in somewhere, I think conservatively, somewhere between $60-80 million to the city in grant money, which was almost entirely done of his own volition,” McCarthy said.

He cited the traffic signal upgrade program, which has been funded with federal money.

“If any public works director got just that program done it would be amazing,” McCarthy said. “But in connection with the rest of the things that he got funding for in the city he’s had a major impact well beyond what would be expected of somebody in that position.”

Comments

28 responses to “Sources: Alvord out as DPW director”

  1. Victor Cavallo

    Mayor: a worse decision you could not have made; to deprive Norwalk the benefit of Mr. Alvord’s vast knowledge and expertise sans any credible replacement.No one knows Norwalk’s infrastructure and it’s needs like Hal Alvord. I’m sure he will be recruited in no time by many municipalities with clearer vision than we have demonstrated.

  2. Paul Persius

    This is the simple fact of the mayor tipping to the union. The union didn’t like Haselkamp…..gone. The union didn’t like Alvord……gone.

    Its a dangerous game as we all know the union is only for the union. They don’t like strict management for a reason.

    Nancy, take a look at all the settled grievances and “side agreements” being written behind closed doors to see what is being given to 2405.

  3. John Levin

    Alvord is 70? He has served in that position for how long? I guess he was keenly focused on succession planning.

    Maybe he could use his vast knowledge and experience with Norwalk’s infrastructure by running for town council? Does Alvord live in Norwalk?

    1. Mark Chapman

      @john Levin

      He lives in Danbury.

  4. Yankee Clipper

    Alvord had great operational strengths but he was very dictatorial … his way or no way. His management style was dated and it was time. Bye bye

  5. Bill

    Time to kick out Rilling. He doesn’t support taxpyares.

  6. Non Partisan Voter

    Why is Councilman Dave McCarthy announcing Mr. Alvord’s departure? By the city charter, the DPW Director reports to the Mayor. It is inappropriate for a councilman to be announcing city personnel changes, especially before either the mayor or the person resigning has announced them.

  7. carol

    guess we can tell it’s an election year-wonder how many more heads will roll???

  8. David McCarthy

    I was in a meeting last night when Nancy called, and she wasn’t available until this afternoon, when we will speak.

    I in no way announced anything. I received a call from Robert Koch of the Hour who told me he knew Hal was leaving and asked for my reaction, which I gave, and which I will give to Nancy, assuming that is what she wants to talk about.

  9. Tony P

    Wow – pretty slanted article here. When Lauricella is quoted twice despite her obstructionism in other parts of the city, its borderline laughable. I’d like to see who replaces him and how well they and the DPW run afterwards. It feels like a witch hunt by everyone involved. The man worked in a system that doesn’t function and did the best he could. We have entire commissions that don’t know their own purview (hello, Zoning).I’d point out the positives that came of his time here, but the vocal few would drown it out. Let’s see how the ‘activists’ and Union sing with someone else – Hal will be laughing all the way to retirement – more likely consult with municipalities that have their act together

  10. QuickNote

    Mr. Alvord brought knowledge, accountability and process to DPW. One of Mayor Knopp’s finest appointments.
    Thank you

  11. Terra Firma

    How will we not miss Hal? Let me count the ways (With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning)

    How will we not miss Hal? Let me count the ways.
    Hal is writ upon Norwalk to the depth and breadth and height
    where every citizen can see, while feeling out of mind
    For the ends of every citizen request be yet a burden.
    We will not miss Hal to the level of everyday’s
    quality of life, through trash and pothole.

    We will not miss thee for the unnecessary traffic light at Fort Point and Van Zant

    We will not miss thee for thy cryptic responses to FOI requests

    We will not miss thee for the changes at Olmstead Place and East Avenue

    We will not miss thee for the sharrows on Beach Road

    We will not miss thee for the maddening bike lanes on Strawberry Hill

    We will not miss thee for the three properties taken by eminent domain after the council said no

    We will not miss thee for the cheap shots taken at officials and citizens in the press

    We will not miss thee for the no-bid contract for the trash machines

    We will not miss thee for the no-bid contract for the treatment plant generator

    We will not miss thee for the trash-lined streets due to lack of a street cleaning program

    We will not miss thee for the reduction of yard waste pickup, and the random pickup schedule

    We will not miss thee for the fact that we are asked to be grateful for an occasional bulk waste pickup

    We will not miss thee for forcing homeowners to shovel plowed street snow off their sidewalks

    We will not miss thee for the damage the snowplows do to sidewalks, cars, windows and fences

    We will not miss thee for a customer service staff with no accountability

    We will not miss thee for the city website that works as a pop quiz for the average citizen

    We will not miss thee during the 53 seconds it takes before we can leave an after-hours message

    We will not miss thee for the paving project in South Norwalk on Election Day

    We will not miss thee for the road patching in the Marvin School parking lot on Election Day

    We will not miss thee as we drive the potholed roadway on Scribner that has remained unpaved for years

    We will not miss thee as we breathe the odious air of the waste water treatment plant in East Norwalk

    We will not miss thee due to groundhog damage from the colony at the wastewater treatment plant

    We will not miss thee for an award-winning treatment plant that is under a consent decree for pollution

    We will not miss thee for the catch basin filter sponge fiasco

    We will not miss thee for the flooding on Water Street

    We will not miss thee for the lack of toilet liners and reverse 911 calls during a hurricane

    We may respect thee for thy experience, as we strive for Right;
    We may genuinely like thee, as a person.
    We may admire thee, for the passion put to pursuing state funding.

    In our old griefs, and with our civic faith.
    We will not miss thee for the opportunities we seemed to lose
    With citizenry consulted little and late,—we look to a future in which,
    suggestions, consultation, from all our residents!—and, if we so choose,
    we shall also thank you for sometimes being better than this list.

  12. EastNorwalkChick

    We really need a “Like” button…well done Terra Firma, well done!

  13. Larry

    Hal did a simply outstanding job of helping Norwalk recover from the consequences of the years of underinvestment in its infrastructure that was an unfortunate feature of the long-serving Esposito administration. He also made significant improvements in our infrastructure with dramatically lower headcount than had existed under earlier administrations, and under constant budget pressures that forced him to aggressively seek outside dollars (e.g. federal and state funds) and cost savings (e.g. outsourcing) in order to accomplish much of anything. Have Hal’s detractors conveniently forgotten what shape our streets and schools were in at the end of the Esposito administration, or how many entirely unaddressed flooding issues existed around the City before Hal?

    Could Hal be painfully blunt at times when he disagreed with folks, or irritate people when he didn’t tell them what they wanted to hear? Unquestionably yes. But as a retired full bird Army Colonel who’d commanded one of the US Army Corp of Engineers seven Divisions, he was also phenomenally capable and expert at getting things done. And for this, the City of Norwalk owes him an enormous debt of gratitude.

    I, like Paul P., have strong reason to believe that Hal’s departure is part of Mayor Rilling’s payback to the unions that supported him and that bridled under the greater demands, higher standards and more rigorous processes that Hal introduced to DPW when he was appointed. And like QuickNote, I agree that Hal was one of Mayor Knopp’s finest appointments.

    Thank you, Hal, for all you have done on behalf of this City.

  14. LWitherspoon

    In May of last year, then-NAACP Vice President Andre Williams claimed that Mayor Rilling failed to honor Candidate Rilling’s promises to terminate Fire Chief Denis McCarthy along with Personnel Director James Hasselkamp and DPW Director Hal Alvord.

    Source: https://nancyonnorwalk.com/2014/05/naacp-calling-for-norwalk-fire-chiefs-head/

    Rilling denied that any such promises were made. Yet Hasselkamp was let go shortly after the election, and promptly hired by another municipality. Alvord has now been let go. And McCarthy’s contract was not renewed, in lieu of a one-year extension.

    All three people named by Andre Williams have seen their employment affected. Does anybody believe that this was just a coincidence? The more likely scenario is that there was some truth to Mr. Williams’s comments about promises made by Candidate Rilling. Would that a journalist investigated further, rather than simply accepting the Mayor’s evasions.

    If Hal Alvord was let go to please Local 2405, which endorsed Rilling in the last election, then Norwalk is saddled with a Mayor who prioritizes Unions ahead of taxpayers. Deeply disappointing, if true.

    https://nancyonnorwalk.com/2014/06/norwalk-public-works-employees-no-confidence-in-dpw-director/

  15. cc-rider

    The comments about payback are amusing. The guy is 70 years old and likely has two retirements coming to him! Poor guy right??

  16. Bill

    I voted for Rilling last time, no chance I vote for him again. He is anti-taxpayer.

  17. Paul Persius

    As proof of a pro union stance, please look at the pile of grievances being settled behind closed doors as we speak with the mayor and personnel director and union heads. (Do you notice none of the union guys who post on here are saying otherwise……..)

    I would also like to know the truth about the “package” Hal is receiving for this forced retirement. Being an election year, and no one wanting a “black cloud” Im sure Hal is walking away with quite a bit of incentives in order for him to go quietly. Is his severance package public info?

  18. Terra Firma

    The so-called payback is for the taxpayers, not the unions. This council is the first council to stand up to Mr. Alvord’s fill-in-the-blank contract approval requests, for example. They’ve actually done independent research on his assertions in council committee meetings and stood firm on budget requests.

    These staff changes are actually part of Mayor Rilling’s promise for better transparency and to clamp down on the bullying and disrespect towards the public.

  19. Wineshine

    Transparency means nothing if those who want it can’t understand what’s being said. Anyone else here have an engineering degree, a resume that includes working with the Army Corps of Engineers, and the breadth of experience of Mr. Alvord? I thought not. I live in East Norwalk. The only “odious” smell here is what’s coming from City Hall these days.

  20. Peter Parker

    Amen and good bye to bad management! Only his incompetence and arrogance will be missed!

    Maybe Mayor Rilling has awakened from his daydream, which may well cost him a second term!

    Now maybe we can look forward to well run and organized DPW that works for the residents of the City and not a self serving one.

    It’s about time and long overdue!

  21. Oldtimer

    Alvord certainly had his own style. The first City Carting contract was presented to the council an accomplished fact that only required council approval as a formality and he sounded quite anxious for an immediate approval. He eventually got approval after at least three more meetings/public hearings and the DPW employees who had been collecting garbage were transferred to other, lower paying jobs.

    Then there was the no-bid $273 thousand dollar deal with City Carting for three new compactors to replace old ones at the transfer station, that Alvord claimed the City did not have resources to repair.

    A little research online showed several manufacturers making similar compactors in the 75 thousand dollar range, offering maintenance and repair services, and complete rebuilt units for about 40 thousand.

    Now, after a little research at the transfer station, I was told only two units had been ordered,(weeks before council approval) and nobody seemed to know if they were new or rebuilt. Now the question is, what was bought? how much did they really cost? Where are they ?
    Where is the left-over money, if any ? Where are the reciepts recording the purchase(s).? What happened to the old, probably repairable or rebuildable, units ?

  22. LWitherspoon

    Oldtimer has devoted a lot of time over the years to smearing Hal Alvord with unsubstantiated innuendo. During the debate over garbage outsourcing, Oldtimer claimed that those in favor of outsourcing were being paid off, and that the savings were not real. Challenged to produce any shred of evidence, Oldtimer failed to do so. Then Nancy on Norwalk investigated the question of whether Norwalk saved any money under outsourcing. The verdict: a resounding yes, with savings confirmed by City officials.

    Now, as Oldtimer begins another effort to smear Hal Alvord, we are reminded of the boy who cried wolf.

    1. Mark Chapman

      @LWitherspoon

      While I have not researched our comments yet to check if Oldtimer actually claimed payoffs, he did post several items that recalled City Carting’s history in Westchester and Fairfield counties, which is not pretty, and we reported on it as well. City Carting was a heavy contributer to the former mayor’s campaign 3 months before the 10-year contract was awarded. Did you ever comment on that? The company has now contributed to Mayor Rilling’s campaign.

      To suggest asking questions, something you do frequently as a means of suggesting payoffs, is “smearing” can be seen as a personal attack. We would request you respect the comment policy against attacking other commenters.

  23. Oldtimer

    LWitherspoon
    Talk about unsubstantiated innuendo.
    For the record, see what example, or examples, of unsubstantiated innuendo I ever posted here about Hal Alvord.
    Good luck with that.

    I am, without question, no fan of Hal’s, but I know better than to make, or imply, anything about anybody that I cannot susbstantiate. I would not be surprised if evidence turns up against Alvord of all kinds of things, but the accusations, if any develop, will not be mine.

  24. Suzanne

    “Hasselkamp was let go shortly after the election, and promptly hired by another municipality. Alvord has now been let go. And McCarthy’s contract was not renewed, in lieu of a one-year extension.”

    “…Norwalk is saddled with a Mayor who prioritizes Unions ahead of taxpayers…”

    LWitherspoon, not to pour boiling hot lava on top of a volcano, but these statements imply so much more than what can be ascertained as true. “The devil is in the details”: please consider this before jumping to conclusions.

  25. Terra Firma

    Could Hal be painfully blunt at times when he disagreed with folks, or irritate people when he didn’t tell them what they wanted to hear?

    Actually, what citizens wanted to hear was truthful responses to simple questions. Hal had a maddening way of telling you the color of the car when you asked the make and model. Not a lie, but not responsive either.

    But as a retired full bird Army Colonel who’d commanded one of the US Army Corp of Engineers seven Divisions, he was also phenomenally capable and expert at getting things done.

    He got lots of unnecessary things done,yes. Big projects,yes. But services? Not so much. If it required engineering timelines or project timelines and came with state funds, yes. If it required staff to do on an ongoing basis? Not so much.

    A city’s ongoing quality of life requires steady sustenance with basic services like street sweeping and regular removal of trash, not just major transplant operations like rebuilding bridges and major reconfigurations of roadways.

    As for Hal’s sometimes brusque and dismissive manner? Public service has no room for excusing this behavior under the guise of “that the way he is”. As the leader of his department, this role model infected many of his staff with similar attitudes towards the public. Blaming the citizenry for not understanding rather than trying to meet their needs is a shabby way to treat those who pay your salary.

  26. LWitherspoon

    @Mark Chapman
    I did indeed express discomfort with the former Mayor accepting contributions from people who do business with the city. I also criticized him on Beach Road bike lanes, raises to Union workers who endorsed him, and the prosecution of Nancy Chapman.

    If you check the record, I guarantee that you will find comments by Oldtimer claiming payoffs to officials who supported garbage outsourcing.

    @Oldtimer
    You say “I know better than to make, or imply, anything about anybody that I cannot susbstantiate.” You also challenge me to find any example of unsubstantiated innuendo you ever posted against Hal Alvord. Then in the very same comment you went on to state that “I would not be surprised if evidence turns up against Alvord of all kinds of things”. Yet another excellent example of innuendo and smear, proving my earlier point.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link