Quantcast
Advertisement

Two sides to the story: Adamowski’s pick to lead Norwalk schools draws strong reactions

Steven Adamowski
Steven Adamowski

Reposted 2:25 a.m. June 16 with links to Tuesday night Board of Education agenda, outline of proposed superintendent’s contract.

NORWALK, Conn. – When Steven Adamowski, PhD, took over as superintendent of Hartford’s public schools in 2006, “His visionary leadership provided the school system with structure. He focused on priorities, such as early literacy, accountability and high expectations and implementing an all-choice system of schools. He also took the lead on becoming the first school district in the state to implement school governance councils to include parents in the decision-making process.”

This is according to then-Hartford PTO Executive President Milly Arciniegas.

AdamowskiAccomplishmentsfromHartfordPTOs[1]

In her letter of July 8, 2011, extolling Adamowski’s performance, she wrote that he took over a system that was dysfunctional, low-performing with no system accountability. Parents lacked trust in the system and parent involvement was “at its lowest.”

That changed, she wrote:

“For the past five years, our children have shown significant gains and everyone is proud of their accomplishments. Because of Adamowski, our children and school system are now on a path to produce extraordinary results.”

The letter paints a different picture of the man the Norwalk Board of Education will vote on at 8 p.m. Tuesday (tonight, Common Council Chambers at City Hall) as its next superintendent than that portrayed on various blogs, some news stories and by some commenters on this site.

Outline of proposed superintendent’s contract

Adamowski would replace Manny Rivera, who cut his stay short after less than two years to take over his hometown New London system – ironically, a system under state control and being run by Special Master Steven Adamowski.

The announcement of Rivera’s hiring two years ago was mostly hailed as the best pick ever to lead NPS. There were a few naysayers, some pointing to Rivera’s flighty employment history, but most of Norwalk was caught up in the thrall of Rivera’s credentials that included being named Superintendent of the Year in Rochester, N.Y., some years earlier.

Adamowski’s impending arrival has elicited a different response, with some of those same naysayers being joined by others, including persistent statewide blogger Jonathan Pelto, whose disdain for Adamowski has fueled many negative comments on this site.

Pelto even called into question the legality of Adamowski’s hiring, and asserted he does not hold the proper credentials, something both Adamowski and Norwalk BoE Chairman Mike Lyons refuted. To read the letter granting Adamowski’s waiver of certification – which carries no expiration date nor any limits of which Connecticut schools can employ him – and the law that enables the waiver, click these links:

Adamowski Waiver

 Public Act No. 07-241 

We spoke with the BoE’s top pick Monday afternoon and found him to be receptive to questions and, he said, aware of what he is getting into.

“The job description that outlined Norwalk’s strengths, accomplishments and challenges was thoughtfully considered but did not give me ‘pause,’” he said in response to one of our questions. “Resistance to change, political issues of an elected Board and entrenchment of the status quo are not unique to Norwalk. They are encountered in every organizational change process and I have successfully dealt with that before.

“All good leaders learn lessons from past experience, adjust strategy to specific context and changing circumstance while adhering to a set of values, principles and goals in an unrelenting pursuit of better outcomes for those we serve. All the children of Norwalk deserve a great education for the investment the community is making. That will be my leadership priority; I trust that the adult issues will dissipate as we all focus on that.”

So, knowing some of the history, why would a veteran superintendent and current state special master want to make Norwalk a late-career move – aside from the $90,000 annual salary bump, that is ($160,000 in his current position; $250,000 according to the proposed Norwalk contract)?

“My motivation to lead Norwalk’s education system is based on my desire to continue my life’s work of providing better opportunities and outcomes for all students by creating better schools,” he said. “A superintendent leads a school district to do this by empowering the performance of its educators and developing their talent, creating programs and schools robust enough to meet the needs of all children and close achievement gaps, and collaborating with stakeholders to redesign a system that will sustain improvement. The needs and challenges of Norwalk’s education system resonate with me. While an ‘under-performing’ district relative to its assets at the current time, it is one of the few cities in the nation that is not experiencing significant financial problems, it is on a ‘reform trajectory’ initiated by the Board and Dr. Rivera, and there are great people within the education system and at all levels of government and civic life committed to change and improvement. With proper leadership and governance for long enough, I believe Norwalk can become a national model for the highest quality urban education.”

Creating a national model is not a foreign concept to Adamowski, at least as far as former Ohio Gov. Bob Taft was concerned.

“You have advanced the progress of the Cincinnati Schools on every front and set them on a course for further improvement,” Taft wrote in a July 8, 2002, letter acknowledging Adamowski’s resignation. “Your clear strategy for a system of autonomous, competing public schools, and your ability to reconstitute and redesign schools and programs within schools are truly a model for the nation.”

A report dated July 18, 2002, on CityBeat.com  questioned why Adamowski was leaving when he did, though, and, while touting his achievements, highlighted a misfire that apparently rankled the local teachers union. The site quoted Tom Mooney, CFT president for 21 years until mid-2000, when he became president of the Ohio Federation of Teachers, as saying “Adamowski is getting a lot more credit from the media than he deserves for reforms at CPS. I was sort of appalled by … the way (The Enquirer and The Post) took the propaganda of the school district and published it verbatim,” Mooney said.

Local NFT President Bruce Mellion has expressed some concern with the BoE’s choice, but said he is keeping an open mind and will work with Adamowski if and when he is appointed.

“We do have some strong reservations about what happened in those other locations,” Mellion said Monday. (Check back later for more comments from Mellion.)

A Hartford Courant editorial written some three months after he took the superintendent job in Connecticut’s capital suggested Adamowski’s “bluntness” had ruffled feathers, saying he was not afraid to “step on toes.” The editorial’s penultimate paragraph could have been written here, today, given the reaction to his impending hiring in Norwalk:

“People mired in the traditional glass-half-empty approach to urban education are already second-guessing and undercutting Mr. Adamowski’s single-minded new way of looking at things.”

Hartford editorial

 

Comments

22 responses to “Two sides to the story: Adamowski’s pick to lead Norwalk schools draws strong reactions”

  1. Jason White

    Mark..cant open the link for his waiver on my mobile device

  2. Sue Haynie

    Mark and Nancy, thank you for the work you do. You are taking a very important issue and giving it the attention and balanced reporting that it deserves.

  3. Disdain for Adamowski? Interesting way to provide commentary on the information I try to provide your readers. I made it clear that Adamowski could get the job but he would need a NEW waiver from the state since he does not hold the certification needed to work in CT. Did they already get the waiver? And if so, how did they do it without Norwalk Board approval?

    But more importantly – here is a question for those who support Adamowski. When it comes to the critically important CCJEF case that would benefit Norwalk probably more than any other community – a case that your elected official – Dem and Rep have worked so hard for – how do you explain that Adamowski is a star witness for Malloy’s effort to destroy the case that would mean so much to Norwalk’s children AND taxpayers – Why would Norwalk hire one of Malloy’s key witnesses against fair school funding for Norwalk – http://jonathanpelto.com/2015/06/15/why-would-norwalk-hire-one-of-malloys-key-witnesses-against-fair-school-funding-for-norwalk/

  4. Adamowski is a star “expert” witness for Governor Mallloy against the position Norwalk’s Mayor and other elected officials have been working so hard to achieve – Why would Norwalk hire one of Malloy’s key witnesses against fair school funding for Norwalk http://jonathanpelto.com/2015/06/15/why-would-norwalk-hire-one-of-malloys-key-witnesses-against-fair-school-funding-for-norwalk/

  5. LMarie

    This post and two others by this commenter were removed. You cannot post entire articles here. You may post an excerpt or sort summary with a link.

  6. MarjorieM

    Looks like Sue Haynie, Lisa Thomson and Mike Lyons get their wish. Norwalk gets a “step on peoples’ toes” superintendent who ‘ruffles feathers.’
    WAIT, isn’t that what Lisa Thomson complained about when she heavily criticized a certain central office administrator? An administrator who “stepped on people’s toes” and ruffled feathers” when he tried to make central office secretaries and staff do their jobs? Can’t play both sides of the fence, Lisa!

    As for the WAIVER, every single teacher and administrator in Norwalk had to go through coursework, CEUs and licensing to get their certification. Every single teacher and administrator in Norwalk has to keep current on common core, literacy, evaluations, etc. It must be nice to have friends in high places who can give waivers so that none of this applies. I am curious to know how many superintendents in Connecticut have waivers and are not certified.

    Mike Lyons, I believe your future as a politician will be dependent on this choice for a superintendent. For your sake, I hope your choice is right.

  7. Mike Lyons

    Marj, I’m making this decision based on what I think is best for Norwalk’s children, not based on my future as a politician serving in volunteer government posts.

  8. Kevin Di Mauro

    I initially thought dealing with SPED would be our new superintendent’s biggest challenge, however after reading all the negativity from people like MarjorieM I think his biggest challenge will be in revealing to Norwalk and it’s students the benefits of having a positive mental attitude.

  9. M. Murray

    Is mike Lyons insuring that there are provisions to heavily penalize this superintendent if he leaves before his contract is up?

    1. Mark Chapman

      @M.Murray

      Yes. The prelim agreement insists on deferred compensation to be forfeited for early departure.

  10. Taxpayer

    Is anyone checking this?

    Are we really to believe a 2007 Waiver is still good for this district, 8 years later? According to this language, it appears that the commissioner should provide this waiver/letter TO THE BOARD, not to the person receiving the waiver. No where does anyone get a carte-blance “no excuses” permission slip to act as a superintendent for life!

    http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/act/pa/2007pa-00241-r00hb-07347-pa.htm

    “Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no person shall assume the duties and responsibilities of the superintendent until the board receives written confirmation from the Commissioner of Education that the person to be employed is properly certified or has had such certification waived by the commissioner pursuant to subsection (c) of this section. The commissioner shall inform any such board, in writing, of the proper certification, waiver of certification or lack [thereof] of certification or waiver of any such person [within] not later than fourteen days after the name of such person is submitted to [him] the commissioner pursuant to section 10-226.”

  11. Taxpayer

    I don’t even think he qualifies under the remaining criteria. Either our SDE will defend its relevancy, or it is a total farce:

    “(c) The commissioner may grant a waiver of certification to a person who the commissioner deems to be exceptionally qualified for the position of superintendent. In order for the commissioner to find a person exceptionally qualified, such person shall (1) be an acting superintendent pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, (2) have worked as a superintendent in another state for no fewer than fifteen years, and (3) be certified or have been certified as a superintendent by such other state.”

  12. MarjorieM

    Mark, what exactly is the deferred compensation? Is there a bonus for staying? If so, how much is it?

    1. Mark Chapman

      @MarjorieM

      Deferred compensation is money withheld from your check and paid at a later date. In this case, part of the projected $250k per year would be held back until the agreed-on date, which I believe to be three years, before it is released. It is not a bonus. Rather, should he leave early, he forfeits the deferred amount.

  13. MarjorieM

    @ Kevin

    Quoting you: I initially thought dealing with SPED would be our new superintendent’s biggest challenge, however after reading all the negativity from people like MarjorieM I think his biggest challenge will be in revealing to Norwalk and it’s students the benefits of having a positive mental attitude.

    It is a fool who will not listen to both sides of a story. Only then can a reasonable judgement be made. – Marj

  14. Kevin Di Mauro

    MarjorieM

    I’ve seen your side of the story long enough to realize what you are.

  15. Sue Haynie

    Per Jon Pelto ‘When I left the General Assembly, I had one of the highest AFL-CIO labor ratings of any legislators..’ What was Mr. Pelto’s voting record in regard to education? And in what way did students and parents benefit from those votes? http://educationbridgeport.com/jon-pelto-responds-to-me-by-emailing-my-parents-seriously/

    Another question that seems appropriate to ask: http://educationbridgeport.com/how-much-money-does-jon-pelto-really-make-for-attacking-school-principals/

  16. Sue, just a quick response. I believe in public education and properly funding our schools which i guess makes me a liberal. And I DO NOT get paid to write my blog.

    I understand and appreciate that you support the “education reform” agenda but my question to you and the others who are pushing Adamowski is how does it help Norwalk to pay him $250k+ a year to testify against Norwalk’s taxpayers and students in the most important lawsuit of our time. CCJEF v. Rell will finally force CT to adopt a fair school funding formula. Norwalk would probably be the single biggest beneficiary of a fair state funding formula and Adamowski is a key expert witness AGAINST the case Norwalk has been fighting for – for 13 years – and the case is finally going to trail. Until Norwalk gets the state aid it needs, not amount of “education reform” will truly close the achievement gap in your community or any community

  17. Yankee Clipper

    Jon Pelto: why do you suddenly care about Norwalk? Where have you been the last 4 years as we struggled financially and operationally? And, please, the CCJEF case is in all sorts of trouble … based on those emails, is the case even still viable? And, please, remember, that Norwalk withdrew for several years from the group.
    It is interesting to note that you are from Mansfield, CT, a rather wealthy town with only 1,400 students yet 35% of your budget is funded by state CES money … what’s that about?
    Just stay out of our business and your feud with Adamowski. That’s your problem, not ours

  18. NorwalkSPEDPartners

    (This is re-posted from another outdated NoN thread and placed here as being more topical)

    Norwalk SPEDPartners is the parents’ group for special ed/504 families that was formed in the wake of the CREC and Cambridge reports that demonstrated the many weaknesses of the Norwalk PS special ed program. As stated previously, we are interested in the facts and, most importantly, how the appointment of the current candidate would benefit or impact these programs in our school system. It is interesting to see how our local decision has created such a statewide buzz — mostly from a single blogger. Obviously, how the candidate has performed in other districts (or even States), the programs he has supported or instituted (or killed), and the educational philosophies he has put into effect (a much greater barometer of what to expect than to merely consider the philosophies that he has espoused)are of keen interest to us in Norwalk. So, for that, we are grateful for all this coverage.

    In the meantime, we do not wish to get caught in the crossfire of some border war between Union and administration supporters. We do not want the Norwalk Superintendent appointment issue (so important to us on the most personal level imaginable — the fate and future of our children)to serve as a proxy war battleground between these interests.

    In Mr. Pelto’s own writing (in the link provided by Ms. Haynie), he is attributed as making the following statement:

    “When I left the General Assembly, I had one of the highest AFL-CIO labor ratings of any legislators and had a 100% voting record with all the liberal and progressive advocacy groups”.

    Is that what this is really about? Is this liberal vs. conservative? Union vs. Administration? Or, is it about what is good for Norwalk and our children?

    Norwalk SPEDPartners does not care about politics. A person can hold whatever political or personal belief they wish. What we care about is the facts. Even a statement from a biased messenger needs to be listened to if the message is true. We just want to make sure that we have the facts and are able to make the right decision for our children here in Norwalk and that we are not just being used as a puzzle piece in some larger picture.

  19. Sue Haynie

    Mr. Pelto,

    With all due respect, I can’t but help wonder why your sudden interest in Norwalk’s tax burdens and lack of equitable State funding. ECS funding is a 4-letter word down here, and you have claimed to be one of its architects.

    And, again, your argument in regards to the CCJEF v. Rell lawsuit, the Norwalk Board of Ed’s hiring of Dr. Adamoski, and what Dr. Adamowski may or may not have advocated for at a different time, in a different district and for a different reason, is a stretch.

    The CCJEF v. Rell lawsuit has been ongoing for 13 years. And, the evidence destruction issue involving the Plaintiff’s long-time Ex. Director appears to have stalled this suit indefinitely. See the June 13, 2015 Hartford Courant article on this:

    http://www.courant.com/politics/hc-lender-education-suit-0614-20150613-column.html#page=1

Leave a Reply

Secret Link