Quantcast
Advertisement

What are we to do?

Send signed letters to news@nancyonnorwalk.com
Send signed letters to news@nancyonnorwalk.com

Mike Barbis is an elected Board of Education member representing District E (West Norwalk, Brookside, Rowayton), a parent, resident, taxpayer.

To the Editor:

The unexpected departure of Superintendent Rivera has once again thrown Norwalk’s educational system into turmoil. Parents and community members are all asking why, how, who, where … and then, “What can we do to stop this from repeating itself?”

Anyone who has spent time watching the bi-monthly Norwalk Board of Education (BOE) meetings knows there is a problem. The tone, the demeanor and the behavior by some board members is truly shocking. However, it is just not the behavior of board members that has driven Rivera out. There are long-term administrators in the school system who have worked in tandem with board members to prevent change, stop reforms and protect their turf. They want to safeguard the “Old Norwalk Way” and consider all efforts to do so acceptable – hiding behind the thin veil of “helping the kids.”

The combined tactics of these two groups has proven very powerful over the years with the pinnacle of their efforts being the resignation of two outside superintendents; each of whom were trying to overhaul and improve our school system. With support (or lack of opposition) from much of the city’s political establishment, this alliance has been successful. Two superintendents are gone. This places the restructuring, the new curriculum and outside funding they brought into the district in jeopardy.

How should parents and the community, who believe in the Norwalk Public Schools, proceed?

  1. The place to start is with the quote, “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” The community cannot let the same mistakes be made.
  2. Parents and the community need to hold members of the BOE accountable for their behavior. Board members are elected and parents need to let them know when they think a member’s behavior and/or actions are unacceptable. Parents need to support the PTOC and stay informed by attending or viewing board meetings.
  3. Parents need to tell members of the BOE that the “Old Norwalk Way” administrators need to move on. This can happen in a variety of ways, including incentives for early retirement, or via the budget (as positions can be de-funded).
  4. Political leaders need to be told that they cannot continue to play both sides – this includes the mayor, as well as the leaders of both political parties. They need to provide bi-partisan support to the reform members of the BOE and can no longer focus on placating those opposed to reform. Appeasement never works.
  5. The future of Norwalk’s Public Schools impacts everyone – regardless of race, color, national origin, ancestry, creed, age, sex or disability. Some have tried to argue that the current turmoil is a racial issue and that the voices of certain minorities are being ignored. The fact is that Norwalk’s minority and economically disadvantaged students have been hurt the most by the “Old Norwalk Way,” as evidenced by Norwalk’s protracted achievement gap. These children stand to benefit the most from increased academic rigor and adult accountability born out from the reforms of the “New Norwalk Way.”
  6. Quality Board of Ed candidates are needed. In 2015, Norwalk will elect five people to the board, representing each of Norwalk’s five neighborhood districts. The political parties are structured in such a way, that as few as four individuals can decide who a party’s candidate will be in a district. In one district, the BOE candidate has run unopposed for years. Parents and voters need to tell both the Democratic and Republican parties that this is unacceptable.
  7. Longer term, the ballot box is critical. Norwalk residents need to vote. There were 47,941 registered voters in 2013 but less than one-third voted for a Board of Ed candidate in the 2013 election. Norwalk has only itself to blame for this. It’s time for our voters to step up and be counted!

Mike Barbis

 

Comments

9 responses to “What are we to do?”

  1. Notaffiliated

    Thank you for publishing this article and the other by Mr Dunne. If the BOE were a private company, more than one individual would be on 30 day probation. Shape up or ship out!

  2. Bruce Kimmel

    Excellent article.

    It also touches on a thorny problem, the nomination of candidates for public office, which rests with the local political parties. Problem is, in many cases nobody wants to run or, put differently, there is nobody with decent credentials to nominate after so many good people have been driven away by the constant turmoil.

    Politics is a voluntary endeavor, political parties are voluntary organizations, and if participation becomes so distasteful, why would anyone…

  3. piberman

    Mr. Kimmel is on target as is Mr. Barbis. What has changed over time is not only the capabilities of our BOE members but the unwillingness of Party Chieftains to exert any influence over elected Party members who “step out of bounds.” So we have BOE members spewing rheotoric in the press on matters for which they could not accept as majority decisions within the BOE. And BOE members making outlandish unsubstantiated comments regarding “discrimination” without so much as a comment by Party leaders. In that environment where Party leaders are unwilling to exert even a modicum of “good manners insistence” few citizens will step up to the plate and serve the public interest. Those that do such as Mike Lyons and the BOE “leadership team” merit our deep appreciation. The other members, despite their disengenuous claims of “working for the children” are in fact working against the well functioning of our public school system and its professional staff. That Democratic Party leaders including the Mayor sit on the hands sient as a sphinx while the rhetoric and discrimination charges is both outrageous and demeans our City. All Norwalk Democrats ought to be up in arms when Democrat elected officials violate accepted public norms of behavior. And ought to demand that Party leaders act as true Leaders. Their studied silence demeans all City Democrats and our City. New leadership is required in the Norwalk Democrat Party – leadership true to the honored traditions of a once proud Party. Demonstrate in Senator Duff’s words that you really do stand up for us.

  4. Bruce Kimmel

    Good comment. A few years ago, party leaders were staunch proponents of civility in politics. What happened? My view has always been, what’s good for the elephant, is good for the donkey. Intellectual honesty should always trump tactical concerns.

  5. Donald Trump

    First off, fire anyone and every one who doesn’t show up to work and gets a paycheck. And then when people try to ask what it is they do exactly or dare have them log their activities, they receive retribution from the no work / no show’s politically aligned contemporaries on the BOE. When there is a plain and evident cancer in the body, you cut it out completely.

    Simply put

    Bruce Morris.

    You’re fired.

  6. Kay Anderson

    Excellent letter, Mike, with well thought out suggestions for change. Thank you.

  7. Curious

    Ok. Let’s say someone was crazy enough to step into this. How much of a time commitment is a BOE role – assuming one were to take a professional, diligent, and informed approach?

    I strongly believe the current political climate discourages most people who would consider running for office. I don’t think I’d be able wrap my head around subjecting myself & my family to this level of commitment, but I actually like Norwalk, and would prefer not to have to move to Wilton/etc to put the kids through school…

    All that said – It occurred to me that I didn’t know the actual time commitment & whether it could effectively be balanced with a typical 50-60hr/wk professional job…Any thoughts?

  8. Mike Barbis

    I think you could handle it. Feel free to call me to discuss. 203.838.7887

  9. MarjorieM

    I find it interesting that the “old Norwalk way” is being trashed. Test scores have been consistently moving upwards. Just what is the “new Norwalk way?” I’m not sure I get it. More rigor? Research shows that educators have to meet students where they are, scaffold their learning and allow them to grow. Core Curriculum has been instituted in all schools. What will change? Please explain.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link