Quantcast

Opinion: Sustainable Streets Norwalk Grades Mayoral Candidates

As part of our effort to elevate policies that promote a more sustainable future for all Norwalkers, Sustainable Streets Norwalk has identified 12 priorities we’d like to see city leaders focus on to promote sustainable development. We sent each 2025 mayoral candidate a questionnaire about their stance on these priorities, and after reviewing their responses and other public statements on these issues, we have assigned each of them a grade on the issues that matter to us.

All of the candidates attended a Sustainable Streets meeting on Tuesday, October 21, to find out what grade they earned, and were given ten minutes to respond or take questions from our members. Based on the quality of their in-person statements, some grades were adjusted, which are included in the table below. 

Sustainable Streets Norwalk Mayoral Candidate Report Card
CandidateOverall ScoreWalking & BikingPublic TransitHousing
John KydesC-B-B-F
Vinny ScicchitanoCB-BD+
Barbara SmythB+AB+B
Erik VitaglioneA-AA+B+

John Kydes

We applaud unaffiliated candidate John Kydes’ willingness to engage in civil discourse despite our disagreements. Nonetheless, we gave him the lowest overall score due to his firm opposition to our position on housing.

We commend John Kydes for his support for improved walkability and bikeability in Norwalk. He demonstrated impressive familiarity with the work of Norwalk’s Bike/Walk Commission, and offered statements of support for alternatives to car transportation, although clear commitments were lacking. His statement: “Traffic in Norwalk is at an all-time high and steps must be taken to take cars off the road in a way that will also benefit the environment” represents a good starting point for working towards transportation alternatives.

Despite our shared interest in multimodal transportation, we strongly disagree with Mr. Kydes on the issue of housing. Mr. Kydes’ campaign has been characterized by a resolute opposition to new rental construction, stating “One of my top priorities is to stop new apartment development in Norwalk”, and reiterated this position at the meeting. He also showed a lack of imagination when it comes to diversifying home ownership opportunities in Norwalk, arguing that there is nothing the mayor could practically do to help. Home affordability is elementally linked to supply and demand; high demand and low supply gives landowners the power to demand outrageous prices. Mr. Kydes’ opposition to any city-led efforts to increase Norwalk’s housing supply stands in direct opposition to our goal to improve housing availability for all.

Vinny Scicchitano

We gave Republican candidate Vinny Scicchitano a middling score due to his mixed level of support for our priorities and general lack of understanding about the policies that matter to us. 

Mr. Scicchitano offered some good ideas for improving transit infrastructure, particularly regarding bus shelters and broader mobility goals for the city. His proposal to bring business and homes closer together aligns well with a mixed-use development pattern that could help make Norwalk more walkable and alleviate traffic woes. His statement “We need to reduce travel distances between home and work by increasing business development that encourages alternate modes of transportation” shows an understanding that mixed-used development is needed to reduce traffic and promote economic development. 

While he communicated abstract support for walking and biking, a number of his responses prioritized outdated and ineffective solutions to traffic congestion, such as roadway widening, instead of backing viable alternatives to driving. His statement “First priority [regarding a shared-use path on Connecticut Avenue] is to reduce traffic congestion…We cannot make a bad situation worse. CT Ave. needs to have a plan that is sustainable for the next 30 years. A shared-use path needs to be incorporated with widening CT Ave.” shows support for a shared use path, which we commend him for, but also advocates for widening CT Ave, which will only induce more demand and result in more traffic.

On housing, he indicated an openness to nonspecific tax policies to facilitate the construction of owner-occupied housing, but his support for multifamily development is tepid. This, in addition to his skepticism around parking reform, puts him out of alignment with Sustainable Streets’ housing priorities.

Barbara Smyth

We gave Democratic candidate Barbara Smyth high marks for her well-informed responses, demonstrating a solid understanding of bike-walk policy and a commitment to improving active transportation.

Ms. Smyth gave good answers on public transit, reflecting both an institutional familiarity with the system’s details as well as a workable vision for its improvement here in Norwalk. Her statement “We need to make bus ridership more appealing to all of residents – no one should be standing in poor weather with no place to sit while waiting for a bus” shows a willingness to take action on bus infrastructure improvements, which are badly needed in Norwalk.

On housing, she expressed qualified support for forward-thinking policies such as duplex allowances and reduced parking minimums, while advocating for a cautious approach. At the meeting, she emphasized that doing too much too fast stirs resentment, and that housing development in Norwalk must be paired with resident consultation, with special attention paid to prevent gentrification.

Erik Vitaglione

We gave Mayoral and Common Council candidate Erik Vitaglione the highest marks due to his excellent responses, outlining ambitious goals.

Having spent 20 months living car-free, Vitaglione has a high degree of familiarity with Norwalk Transit District’s strengths and weaknesses. His statement “I rode the bus for 20 months, everyday […] Not for messaging but necessity. There is a severe lack of benches, shelter, and signage along all stops.” is a testament to his personal familiarity with the issues that bus riders in Norwalk face today.

While there were some misunderstandings about procedural aspects of municipal policy, his position on duplex housing was solid. Mr. Vitaglione was neutral on eliminating mandated parking minimums downtown, though he expressed an interest in studying cities that have successfully implemented similar reforms. Sustainable Streets commends his experiential knowledge, and his statements reflect the highest degree of alignment with our priorities of any mayoral candidate.

We would like to thank all the candidates for responding to our questionnaire, joining us at our general body meeting last Tuesday, and for engaging in respectful dialogue. While we criticize some candidates’ policy positions, we applaud their willingness to listen and accept criticism graciously.

Sustainable Streets Norwalk is a volunteer association that advocates for improved walkability, bikeability, public transportation, housing for all, and urban green space. Guided by these foundational goals, we aim to elevate those elected officials whose policies align with our vision for a more accessible, connected, and sustainable Norwalk. We encourage all readers who share our values to take into consideration this candidate report card when they vote in this year’s mayoral election.

Editor’s note: This piece is an opinion article. The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the perspectives of the publication or its staff.

Comments

7 responses to “Opinion: Sustainable Streets Norwalk Grades Mayoral Candidates”

  1. I’m not sure where you’re getting your sustainability ideas for what Norwalk needs because we’re realistically past any sensible capacity and every useful plan to make things more efficient on that front have been thrown aside in favor of building large scale apartments that are not really set up for families with children or addressing the actual needs of our area it’s simply installing different set of goals for the city from what we have living here I understand there’s a high house but the city hasn’t done anything to actually address that in a way that’s meaningful to the people that already live here we are not Brooklyn we are not Manhattan if we were I would live there instead of here Vinny understands that. And you guys focus on things that aren’t really relevant look at the status of all the supports necessary for a city and I don’t mean the hospital but look at the electric grid the water supply the sewage treatment the availability and pricing of service providers things like that. One of the very few competent mechanics in the city is running for mayor for god sakes I’m tempted to not vote for him because I would rather have them fixing my car that might be 30 mechanics close to my house but none of them know how to turn a wrench. And the city encourages that state of things currently

    1. David Muccigrosso

      Commas and periods are a thing.

      Sewers can be built. Housing can and should be built to accommodate families — which would require a less draconian zoning code.

      What can’t be gotten back is two whole generations losing out on building housing equity in their 20’s and 30’s because there is no entry-level housing.

    2. Becca Stoll

      Why does all housing have to be set up for families with children? Others might also want to live here and not have more rooms than they need, or a car, or to deal with fixing their roof if it leaks. To be clear, we need both, neither at the exclusion of the other.

      Also forgive how tongue in cheek this is, but in the 2 years I’ve leased my EV I have had to take it in exactly once. Huge time-saver!

    3. Paul Fox

      Yes, you’ve correctly identified that infrastructure does become a challenge as our town grows and changes, but it’s not a challenge we can opt out of. A town is a living thing; it can’t be frozen in amber or it dies.

      There are many ways to solve the infrastructure challenges we face, but we believe that a key part of the solution is reducing car dependency. The more people can get around without cars, the less traffic clogs our streets, the less pollution fills our air, and the less parking is needed, taking up valuable space.

  2. David Muccigrosso

    This is why I’m voting for Erik.

  3. Bryan Meek

    Kydes ties Bonenfant for this badge of honor with their Fs. Vinny and Jo Bennet honorable mention with their D+.

    The mindset behind this survey is one contributing factor to the bone crushing traffic we have today that is doing the opposite and actually ruining quality of life. It is born of this fantasy that the textbooks are right and they can change human behavior simply because they think it’s the right thing to do. Instead of listening to what residents want, they think they know what’s best for us. It’s rather chilling.

    The reality is people are going to eat cat food before they give up their cars budget wise. NYC transplants will move here and BUY cars. Ask any High School kid if they would walk or take their car if it was an option. When driverless cars are the norm in a few decades and the cost curve comes down, fewer and fewer people will take public transportation and hardly anyone will walk anywhere more than a few miles and in most cases it will be for exercise or leisure. No one is riding their bike to stews to get ice cream and butter. The walkers I know usually drive to the beach or city hall to walk around. No one can walk to Cranbury Park without taking their life in hand. The one place we actually own the land and no one can figure out how to get a sidewalk in there.

    If my mind wasn’t already made up this would make it easy. The narrowing of our streets and installation of these expensive sidewalks as a priority sometimes where they aren’t even needed over the actual fixing of roads like has been going on for too long has made our streets more dangerous than ever and that is backed up by data. We’ve had more street fatalities in just the last few years than I can remember in a long time. A new approach is needed. Smooth streets with traffic light that work will reduce aggressive driving and make streets safer to walk.

    1. Becca Stoll

      I am really getting tired of comments that insinuate that we, the members of SSN, are not residents of Norwalk too. We are. We all pay taxes, whether on the homes we own or as a portion of our high rents.

      I own a cat and my husband and I recently downsized to one car to save money and try to practice what we preach. Human food tastes great.

      When I have a high schooler someday do you think I’m going to waste money (and taxes) on buying them a car? Hell no, they can take the bus and ride their bike! They will be in much less danger than your average 16-year-old behind the wheel, and I still won’t be stuck schlepping them around town, something my parents were similarly relieved of having to do when they were raising me in NYC.

      Driverless cars will still cause traffic. The train will still be faster at rush hour and cheaper than a single-occupancy vehicle. It will remain my preferred way to commute.

      Many residents of Norwalk do their grocery shipping car-free. Ignoring their existence does not make them go away. They still pay taxes on roads that they use (and tear up) far less than the average driver. You clearly haven’t met enough walkers. We’d love to have you at our next General Meeting so you that you can talk to some more folks who do.

      Lastly, street fatalities are almost always linked to the fact that someone involved was driving a car. Fewer cars, fewer accidents.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link