Quantcast

Norwalk Moves Forward with $1.1M Land Purchase Despite Price Concerns

NORWALK, Conn — The purchase of a small plot of land that is causing big controversy in the city moved forward despite concerns over the shifting funding sources and $1.1 million price tag for the 0.19-acre plot near Mathews Park. City officials say the deal will improve access to the park and prevent high-density residential development at the site, but some question why the price tag is more than double the city’s own appraisal.

The Board of Estimate and Taxation (BET) approved the funding 5-2 after a spirited discussion at its Feb. 10 meeting. Three days later, the Finance and Claims Committee followed suit.

The proposal now heads to the Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 19 and the Common Council on Feb. 25.

Concerns Over Funding Shift

At last week’s meeting, BET members Troy Jellerette (D) and Anne Yang (R) expressed their concerns with the plan. Jellerette objected to approving a capital appropriation for the purchase, which the city had initially planned to buy using funds from the American Rescue Plan Act.

“I felt comfortable approving this as … an ARPA deal,” he said. “But now … I just think that based on that piece of property … I’m not comfortable with this now.”

The city had previously approved the purchase using ARPA funds, but Chief Financial Officer Jared Schmitt explained that the negotiations had extended past the Dec. 31 deadline to allocate those funds. As a result, the city had allocated the ARPA funds to paving projects, offsetting the proposed capital expenditure.

“We are going to take the capital budget up by $1.1 million,” said Board Chair Ed Abrams (D). “Elsewhere in the budget, there will be savings associated with what was originally a paving plan.”

Appraisal Dispute and Property Value

Another major point of contention is the price. Yang pointed out that the proposed sale price was more than double the amount that the city’s own appraiser had valued the property.

“The property, under our assessment, is appraised at $400,000,” she said, adding that it had been purchased by the current owners, 6 Butler Properties LLC, in 2020 for $392,000.

Corporation Counsel Darin Callahan replied that an independent appraiser had recently valued the property at $980,000 based on recent sales in the area.

“So I would say our assessor’s appraisal has it undervalued,” he said.

“By two-and-a-half times?” Yang asked.

No Room for Renegotiation

Despite concerns, city officials say renegotiating the price isn’t an option. Callahan and Democratic Mayor Harry Rilling explained that although the .19-acre plot is currently vacant, the appraisal considered its “highest and best” use and that, based on available parking, the property could potentially support 20 housing units.

“So once you value the number of units and the number of parking spaces and look at the comparative sales in the area, that’s how they arrived at that number,” Callahan said.

Callahan also said the developer would have had little difficulty in getting zoning approval for the hypothetical housing development, saying the city would have issued it “over-the-counter.”

Yang said she could not justify an expenditure so far above the city’s own appraisal and asked if city officials could renegotiate the purchase price.

Rilling said such an effort would be pointless, saying the negotiations had been ongoing and started at $1.4 million and had sometimes included a land swap and parking arrangements before reaching the current status.

“Right now, we’ve had many negotiations with the developer.“The price remains at 1.1 (million dollars), and he will not negotiate any further,” he said. “We’ve exhausted many, many hours of negotiations and talking and discussing. And again, it was flipping properties and giving parking spaces. This was the cleanest way that we ended up coming to an agreement.”

Callahan agreed.

“The price they really want is $1.4 million. It’s commonly a theme … and we’re reminded quite often that what they really want is $1.4 million,” he said. “The $1.1 million is, we’re not going to be able to convince them to reduce the price lower.”

The city plans to use the property to improve access to Mathews Park, which also includes the Lockwood-Mathews Mansion and Stepping Stones museums. While some officials remain wary of the price, the proposal now faces two more votes before final approval.

Comments

9 responses to “Norwalk Moves Forward with $1.1M Land Purchase Despite Price Concerns”

  1. David Muccigrosso

    >> and prevent high-density residential development at the site

    Why in Satan’s name are we taxpayers paying over a million dollars to PREVENT development? This is INSANE.

    Enough is enough. I already have to pay absurd rents and can’t afford a house or condo because of NIMBY’s utter, embarrassing 50 years of failure. This is just adding insult to injury.

    I condemn this in the strongest terms.

  2. Bryan Meek

    We are being fleeced. Connect the dots. 6 Butler St, owned by 6 Butler Properties LLC, owned by Belpointe Capital LLC, who bought it in 2019 for $392,000. Norwalk gets to pay $1.1 million for the parcel that the city just appraised at $402,000 in 2023. Meanwhile the mall which cost $300 million to build is suing us to get it down under the current $155 million to save on their taxes.

    How is it possible that the mall is worth half what it cost in the same time this property is suddenly worth 280% more?

    A 0.6 acre lot with 100+ feet of West Ave frontage just sold for $1.5 million. And tax bills are going up double digits.

    What does it take for prosecutors to get curious?

  3. Michael McGuire

    Why not just walk away from the deal? Is it really worth enhancing access to a park that said access should have been included in initial design for the area. And why the sudden interest in limiting housing development? Is it because the apartment development market is slowing way down and most likely, the prior funding sources for ‘municipal partnership’ will be another DOGE victim? This is another $1.1 million that won’t go to reducing the tax burden on beleaguered Norwalk taxpayer.

  4. douglas hartmuss

    this has to be the biggest waste of our tax dollars of all time enough is enough this is insane that much money for a postage stamp of property and then you say you want more apartments no enough is enough harry and friends have to go this town needs a forensic accounting now we dont have the money guys we cant afford the taxes as it is STOP THE MADNESS

  5. Tysen Canevari

    Welcome to Norwalk. Everyone keeps voting for Harry and gang which allows for no checks and balances in this town. We did the same at Hatch and Bailey. Grossly overpaid what it was worth for a company that was closing its doors. They do what they want and get away with it which is disgusting in my opinion. Please vote for Vinny in November to end this chaos.

  6. douglas hartmuss

    “DESPITE PRICE CONCERNS” in other words HARRY AND CO dont give a crap about what we the taxpayer the people of norwalk think or say against it lets just keep raising taxes,fees,surcharges whatever you want to call them everyone get ready the balloon is about to burst

    1. Bryan Meek

      @DH. The balloon popped awhile ago. They’ve been using lipstick and a compliant press since the last reval, but the gig is just about up. Even after hoarding our money in an abusively overfunded rainy day fund, it still isn’t enough to hide the four digit tax increases coming to your homeowners bill this July. And my guess is the bottom falls out in the next year or two when there is no more rainy day fund. These “free” schools we are building will end up costing us 9 figures on debt service, which is not reimbursed by the state…..and the state which is hurting now has discretion on what and when they will reimburse us, so the other $400 million isn’t guaranteed. This is why some of us think it unwise to throw parties and rent plastic Christmas trees.

  7. Paul Lanning

    “City officials say the deal will improve access to the park and prevent high-density residential development at the site”…That’s a joke, right? Just across the street on the north side of Butler, vast new apartment construction already dominates the streetscape.

  8. Skip Hagerty

    But, it prevents high density housing on 0.19 acres. Great job Mayor!

Leave a Reply

Secret Link