Quantcast

Planning & Zoning Approves 300-Unit Merritt 7 Housing Conversion

NORWALK, Conn.— The plan to turn two former Merritt 7 office buildings into 300 housing units was approved at the Planning and Zoning Commission’s February 18 meeting.

The 300 units will include 27 units designated for workforce housing, according to the draft affordability plan for the project.

The plan was originally scheduled to be voted on at the commission’s January 21 meeting, but was delayed over fire safety concerns. 

Lisa L. Feinberg, an attorney at Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, the law firm representing the Merritt 7, said that her team and the fire marshal created a plan so that the buildings could be evacuated directly in the event of a fire.

New Amenities

Feinberg said the new site would have 895 parking spots, a reduction of 381 parking spaces from what is currently at the site.

Jake Granoff, a Senior Project Architect at Granoff Architects and Vice President of Development at Granoff Real Estate, the firm helping with this project, said the plan is to convert some of the old parking space into new outdoor amenities, including: a great lawn, barbecue spaces, an outdoor lounge, a dog park, and an outdoor playground.

Granoff said there will also be new indoor amenities, such as a demonstration kitchen, a game room, a gym, a yoga studio, a playroom, a co-working library, a mail lounge, and a pet spa.

Granoff said the parking lot will be repainted and the number of spaces will decrease  because some of the spaces are not as wide as required by local standards. 

The Merritt 7 team also presented a traffic study to the commissioners, which showed that the level of traffic around the site would decrease during weekdays but increase on the weekends.

Commissioner Questions 

Commissioner Jacquen Jordan-Byron asked if the new apartments would have public access to the river behind the apartments.

Feinberg said she didn’t believe there was a safe location for river access. 

Chair Chapin Bryce asked if there was a direct way to walk from the apartments to the train station.

Feinberg said residents could walk across the deck to the train station.

Developer Comments

“On behalf of the development and design team, we’re grateful to the Planning & Zoning Commission for their unanimous approval and to the Norwalk community for their collaborative engagement throughout the process,” said Granoff in an email.

“M7 Lofts represents an opportunity to thoughtfully reposition underutilized office buildings into much-needed housing while promoting sustainability and long-term economic vitality,” Granoff continued via email.

“We look forward to working closely with the City as the project progresses and are excited about the next steps,” Granoff said in his email.

History of the Site

Feinberg said the former office spaces were built between 1980 and 2002.

“The office market began to change over the last couple decades, particularly following the pandemic, [and] demand for office space has dwindled and it has left municipalities with extremely high vacancies, and Norwalk has not been immune to this issue,” Feinberg said.

Feinberg highlighted why she believed the proposed plan was a good idea for Norwalk: “We know the need for housing has continued to grow, so by converting surplus office space to new homes, both of these issues can be addressed.”

Editor’s Note: A previous version of this article incorrectly identified Bryan Baker as a commissioner and stated that he asked a question during the meeting. Baker is a city employee and was not in attendance. The question referenced was asked by Commissioner Chaplin Price. The article has been updated to reflect this correction.

Comments

15 responses to “Planning & Zoning Approves 300-Unit Merritt 7 Housing Conversion”

  1. David Muccigrosso

    Why in the world do 300 units need almost 900 spots? This is INSANE OVERKILL. You could reduce that by half and still have hundreds of extra spots on any given day.

    How disgusting. But GREAT that they approved this project! It was even MORE disgusting that these buildings just sat there empty for so long.

    1. Skip Hagerty

      Only a measly 9% of the units are designated for workforce housing? Where is Bob Duff, Jim Himes, and the new Mayor on this? Why aren’t they pushing for 50% in light of the affordability crisis?

      1. David Muccigrosso

        This canard needs to die.

        I don’t know about you, but I believe in the free market. And the free market is GREAT at creating affordability.

        Traditionally, when we build enough housing, what happens is that as older housing stock ages, it depreciates (duh!). That housing naturally becomes more *affordable*.

        What matters is the total number of units built, NOT the rents at which they’re built. Forcing too many units to be built BELOW their market price actually makes affordability WORSE for most people, who AREN’T the lucky winners.

        I’d rather Norwalk build 10,000 more high-end units that will keep the rich commuters from bidding up the middle and low ends of the market where *I* rent, than keep on with this inane trickle of a few hundred units here and there.

        1. David Muccigrosso

          Moreover, the only reason why it seems like ONLY the most expensive housing ever gets built, is because we so severely underbuild.

          When you can’t build as much as the market will bear, then the only play is to build the most profitable projects available.

  2. Becca Stoll

    Yet another great argument for the River Line – we need more transit for all the new neighbors!

  3. Matthew Silber

    This is very exciting! This is a great location for such a project.

    And I agree with Becca – this makes building the River Line even more essential!

    https://norwalkcurrent.com/opinion-we-need-the-river-line/

  4. Tysen Canevari

    just what we need More apartments. Where is Harry’s appointed director of business development getting companies to come to town? Nope, more apartments that do exactly nothing. Just another stupid move by Norwalk. More lobbyist money for the politicians

    1. David Muccigrosso

      Tysen, what do you think those big empty office buildings were doing just sitting there? Precisely “nothing”.

  5. Tysen Canevari

    David, yes I am aware of that. My point is that we have director of this and director of that. What are we doing to entice business here? Apartments bring nothing but traffic and more people to Norwalk.

    1. David Muccigrosso

      Apartments reduce traffic when located in walkable areas.

      Why do you think “more people” is bad? Do you think population growth overall is bad? Where do you think those people should go? Why do you think the people ALREADY in those places should think any differently than you do?

    2. Jan Degenshein

      Historically, the workforce moved where the jobs were. That changed with the millennial generation. Today, the workforce moves to a location that attracts them for other reasons: housing opportunities, culture, arts, entertainment, a vibrant downtown, multimodal transportation, climate, quality education, among others. Today, commerce is compelled to follow the workforce and establish itself where the people are.
      Dwelling unit availability is essential to attract a workforce. A workforce is essential to attract new business. New business is essential not only to provide the services a community needs, but to balance the real estate tax distribution that became so woefully skewed against our resident population after COVID-19. A balanced taxbase makes it more affordable for all of us to live here.
      More dwelling units attract more potential employees, which in turn attracts more commerce, broadening the real estate tax base and making our community more affordable for everyone.
      Apartments are the linchpin to a long-range plan of success.

      1. Peter Marino

        I really couldn’t care less if they convert it all to apartments or not but your logic is way out there.

        Choosing a place to live based on “Vibes” and then worrying about a job is funny. This idea that if they were build more apartments so workers will appear, then businesses will appear, then taxes will go down, then unicorns will descend from the heavens. Sure, man. Totally how it works. And we should we’ll all remember the community guidelines: no complaining when the choo‑choo train starts blowing it’s horn. The tracks are literally right there. That’s just the sound of economic development.

      2. David Muccigrosso

        Jan – An additional wrinkle is, it’s not *just* that Millennials “move to a location that attracts them”. That’s not EVERYONE, not even MOST of us; it’s a privileged 5-10% of the population.

        However, take my situation for an example. My employer is based in Wilton, which isn’t too far. Outside of renting in Wilton’s bare handful of apartment complexes, most of my coworkers can’t REMOTELY afford to buy a house in Wilton; even buying in Norwalk is a challenge for most of them. Many are thus forced to rent in Stamford or Norwalk, or they buy a house they can BARELY afford MUCH further north or east to live in the greater Danbury area or as far as Milford and Wallingford, and suffer through as much as 2 hours of commuting on the Merritt every day.

        (Funny how the people who say “go buy a house somewhere you can afford” aren’t willing to make that commute themselves)

        The jobs are being created in Wilton, but Wilton refuses to build. Norwalk WAS relatively cheaper, but the SFH areas are fully-built out, so that stock is always going to be in fixed supply, and the only way to accommodate the newcomers is to densify existing stock.

        The jobs won’t just stop being created. These aren’t remote jobs in NYC, these are right next door in Wilton, and the company isn’t just going to stop growing just because a bunch of Norwalkers are mad — that’s economic suicide on the company’s part.

  6. Tysen Canevari

    ok, if you think the apartment people are walking around Norwalk then think again. Other than living on Washington Street where do they walk? What about Vernon and Rockville? Plenty of real estate there to develop. Instead we over develop Norwalk so that people like Bob Duff and other politicians get lobbyist money. I live here because it was a and is a great community but now it is too crowded. Drive down CT Avenue and tell me about people walking. The only people on Wheels Bus are the ones that cant afford a car. The new revitalized train station on Glover Avenue has about 10 cars there on a weekday. Obviously, the people on the left think this is all wonderful and everyone bikes to work or walks there. Not reality at all.

    1. David Muccigrosso

      You obviously don’t live in SoNo, whose walkable area is MUCH more than just Washington.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link