Quantcast

Wall Street group launches petition backing zoning changes to support housing, arts and business growth

NORWALK, Conn. — Members of the Wall Street Neighborhood Association have launched a petition supporting the creation of a zoning pilot for the Wall Street Corridor. A zoning pilot is a temporary, small-scale test of new zoning regulations.

They say it would allow more housing, support local businesses, and strengthen the district’s role as the city’s arts and cultural center.

The proposal comes as Norwalk continues to face pressure around housing availability and affordability, with zoning and development strategies drawing both support and concern from residents and officials across the city.

The petition is intended to build public awareness and support for a set of zoning changes the group has discussed for years, including adjustments to parking requirements, housing density, and affordable housing rules.

“The petition is just the one way of putting out there the zone changes we’re requesting,” said Wall Street Neighorhood Association member Jason Milligan, describing it as part of a broader effort to continue improving the neighborhood.  

Focus on enabling smaller, more accessible housing

At the center of the proposal is a push to change how zoning regulates residential units in the district.

Supporters argue that current rules cap the number of units allowed per building, encouraging developers to build fewer, larger, and more expensive apartments.

“Where it clicked for me was understanding that because of the regulations now, it favors developers developing larger units,” Wall Street Neighborhood Association member Marc Alan said. 

They say adjusting those rules would allow for more smaller units within existing buildings — an approach they believe would better support artists, students, and younger residents.

Similar strategies have been explored in other cities, like Hartford, to increase housing supply, but results can vary depending on market conditions and implementation.

“When I understood that… it would allow for a developer to create smaller, more affordable units and more of them, that becomes attractive,” Alan said. 

Supporters described the goal as making it possible for people who already work and create in the district to live there as well.

“They come here to work, they come here to play, they come here to create. But they should be able to live here,” Alan said. 

Parking changes tied to district-wide approach

The proposal would also reduce or eliminate parking requirements for many properties, instead treating parking as a shared resource across the district.

Supporters say that reflects the reality of Wall Street’s historic buildings, many of which cannot accommodate on-site parking.

“If you’re a developer… you have to create a certain number of parking spaces… but in a historic building, you can’t create new parking,” Alan said. 

They argue that constraint contributes to larger, more expensive units, as developers must offset parking requirements.

At the same time, supporters acknowledged the approach will not address every concern.

“We can’t solve everything,” Milligan said, pointing to broader city-led efforts around infrastructure and planning. 

Affordability framed outside traditional programs

The proposal also seeks to adjust how affordable housing requirements apply to smaller projects, allowing developers to contribute to a housing fund rather than include deed-restricted units.

Supporters drew a distinction between formal “affordable housing” and what they describe as lower-cost market-rate units.

“We are affordable down here, we don’t get credit for it in the capital-A sense,” Milligan said, referring to state-defined affordability programs. 

They argued that reducing regulatory and compliance costs could make it easier for smaller developers to create more units overall.

“There’s a cost to it… and all costs do get eventually passed through,” Milligan said. 

Petition framed as a small step within a broader vision

Supporters repeatedly emphasized that the proposed changes represent a limited adjustment rather than a large-scale transformation.

“This is one small piece,” Milligan said, describing the proposal as a narrow set of changes within a larger set of ongoing developments in the area. 

The group is seeking to implement the overlay as a pilot program that could be revisited if it does not achieve the intended results.

“We think it will work. We want the chance to try,” Alan said. 

Vision centers on a live-work community

Supporters said the broader goal is to build a neighborhood where people can live, work, and participate in the local arts and business community.

“We always talk about people who work in this area, who create in this area, play, and we want to add live to that,” Alan said. 

The group described that vision as critical to sustaining the district’s identity as an arts-focused area and supporting long-term economic growth.

“If you have nowhere to live, you’re going to leave,” Alan said, referring to students, artists, and young professionals who may otherwise move out of Norwalk. 

They also pointed to the relationship between residential density and business activity.

“You need people. People need things to do. You need stores, but those stores need customers,” Alan said. 

Economic and community impacts cited

Supporters said increasing the number of residents in the area would help drive foot traffic, support events, and strengthen local businesses.

“The whole goal… was to drive more people down here,” Milligan said, adding that increased density could help “economically raise everybody.” 

They also emphasized the role of events and community activity in shaping the neighborhood.

“There are social benefits to events that go beyond the economics,” Alan said, citing stronger neighborhood connections and increased public safety tied to active public spaces. 

Petition intended to build awareness

Supporters said the petition is meant to give residents a way to engage with the proposal and signal support as discussions continue.

“This is just… to bring attention to what we’re doing,” Milligan said. 

They said the effort reflects the association’s ongoing work to shape the neighborhood’s future, which has evolved significantly over the past decade.

“We all want the same thing for the neighborhood,” Milligan said. “How you get there is all of the above.” 

The proposal is expected to be part of ongoing discussions as city officials and residents continue to weigh how best to balance housing, economic development, and neighborhood character in Norwalk.

Comments

13 responses to “Wall Street group launches petition backing zoning changes to support housing, arts and business growth”

  1. David Muccigrosso

    Finally, a neighborhood association that isn’t just a bunch of angry NIMBYs who don’t understand zoning!

  2. David Muccigrosso

    “live-work community” is just how most cities were traditionally built BEFORE we instituted insane parking requirements and designed everything for cars to just speed on through, instead of prioritizing walkability.

    I wish there were a similar project for SoNo — I’d focus it on making it by-right to build any building that matches the traditional historically-protected sizes and stylings. There are DOZENS of empty and under-utilized lots that are too small for a massive 5-over-1, but are PERFECT for a 2-4 story mixed-use midrise. We should work to relocate all those stranded businesses who can’t move but for whom the neighborhood no longer makes sense — like that absurd lighting store next to SoNo Harbor Deli — and replace them with new retail that can bring in additional foot traffic, and proper apartments above to HOUSE the new foot traffic and keep the neighborhood from getting ever-more unaffordable.

  3. Thomas Blyth

    If we want to build Wall St back into the thriving downtown it once was, we need to let it operate in the conditions that build strong cities and downtowns. Excessive parking and insufficient population is a huge part of what has choked the area and kept it from recovering for the past 70 years. Let’s get some more people in, eliminate barriers to entrepreneurship, stop choking downtown in exhaust and parking, and clean up or replace the area’s grocery store.

    This plan will be a great step in that direction.

    1. Anthony Pavia

      Connecting Wall Street to the surrouding neighborhoods is the best way to ensure Wall Street remains vibrant – when you cant easily walk or bike across EAST AVE to access the happenings down on Wall Street, you cut of an entire neighborhood that would and could walk to shops and stores and the theater there.

    2. David Muccigrosso

      Also, a dedicated focus on pedestrian safety.

      One of the things that makes Washington Street so vibrant is the fact that there are not one but TWO crosswalks, one of them elevated. This keeps ALL traffic down the street rather slow, so that most people can safely cross even outside of the crosswalks proper.

      The big mistake that killed Downtown was turning West Ave into a 4-lane stroad so that cars could fly by at 40mph. Sorry, but there’s no speed limit in the world that can stop that from just being devastatingly hostile to pedestrians. The single best thing we could do for all of Downtown would be to turn 2 lanes of West Ave into one long urban park and use it for street festivals.

  4. Kimmi Krieger

    This is a good proposal. It fits with how Wall Street was built historically and still is. If you walk around the Wall Street area and observe the existing streetscapes–not just the frontage but behind the buildings, down alleyways, in and around the small original parking lots and loading zones–you see tiny, creative spaces for living and working carved out of basements, added on to former stables or the back of buildings.

    It’s a neighborhood scaled for people, not cars. Let’s try letting it bloom. This zoning proposal makes sense.

  5. Peter Marino

    Why does it feel like the previous mayor almost spent his entire term treating the Wall Street neighborhood like it personally insulted his secret potato salad recipe? Every time something good was about to happen down there, he swooped in like, “Nooo no, not on my watch.”

    There was talk of a Train stop? Blocked.
    Anything Milligan Holdings? Denied like a called 3rd strike
    Any progress whatsoever? Hard pass
    That Building that burned? How long did that play out

    We’ll probably never know how much time, money, and collective SANITY got vaporized by those stall tactics- for what? This whole thing kicked off in or around 2008. Two. Thousand. Eight. We could’ve raised a whole teenager in the time it took to accomplish absolutely nothing. And what of that mysterious $5 million that vanished that we often wonder about?

    But while we’re fixing things, can someone — anyone —PLEASE address the City Market parking situation. The entrance is blocked every single day by people dropping off Grandma like she’s being delivered via Uber. It’s a traffic hazard and it should be a No Left Turn entrance period

  6. Marc Grenier

    Now is the perfect time to petition the City to consider the proposed overlay plan. The Wall Street area is really taking shape and getting more traction. Jim Travers and his team have and continue to seek ways to make the area better. Making Burnell Boulevard 2 way was a big step to connecting the overall area.

    There is a housing affordability crisis, and this pilot proposal is but one way the City can be flexible in its approach to work together to address changes that are needed.

    Norwalk is unique and the City should not maintain the one size fits all approach to how the City should be developed. Flexibility is the key!

  7. Chris Dwyer

    A real estate mogul with an office at the top of Wall St (Milligan Realty) is heading this group and financially benefits from literally everything they ever suggest.

    How am I supposed to take their recommendations in any sort of good faith?

    Norwalk has a conflict of interest problem and we need to eradicate it. Let the residents, not the developers, decide ~everything~.

    1. Hi Chris, I want to reply to you because I do understand where you are coming from. I am not asking you to trust Jason because he is a developer, just not to think the worst because he is. The reason you should trust him is that in my time on the board of Directors of the WSNA with him, he has never missed a single meeting. We meet once a month, and have for nearly the past decade; we met continually through Covid. I don’t know any other neighborhood association which has done that, nor anyone else with Jason’s track record for consistency – not even me. A man shows up like that, making time in his busy schedule for only one reason, and it’s out of care. As for some examples that would show you he cares more about the neighborhood than you think — in one of his empty stores, he had been approached by weed dispensary/vape store ready to move in — Jason could have prioritized profit over the needs of the neighborhood wanted to hold out for something better. (We didn’t need a store like that. He was also approached for renting to a barber shop. Did we really need another?) He held out, and today thanks to his vision, and patience, we have instead a thriving bakery. A media company. A pottery business. A vintage home decor retail store, and so much more. But the main reason still is my first one. He shows up – far more than any of his critics ever have!

      1. Chris Dwyer

        I hear you Marc, and I do not think the worst of anyone. But we need to unravel conflict of interests in this town and ensure that we are funneling people to best balance of power – unfortunately this is a pattern that has plagued most parts of Norwalk for way too long.

        It is a consolidation of power for someone to both the primary financial business beneficiary and primary advocate for said financial activity. Look at Washington Street, AGW, @OnWashintonStreet, for instance for similar consolidations of ownership and “advocacy”.

        I’m going to try and meet with Mr. Milligan, and I promise you I will come to that table in good faith to talk about the plethora of issues and needs for Norwalk and find out what venn diagram there is between our priorities.

        1. David Muccigrosso

          Chris, why not the concern about Spinnaker and the other massive developers, who are MUCH bigger than Milligan, and not even local?

          The reality is, if we are going to agree that big developers are “bad” or even at least “not the best way to build the city and housing we need”, then the construction is going to have to come from SOMEONE else.

          And that someone is small- and mid-size contractors, many of whom already live here! If anything, Norwalk is quite ideally situated as a city to pioneer rebuilding the independent homebuilder ecosystem that built our most treasured places like Washington and Wall Street over a century ago.

          But the best way to help them is to make missing-middle housing by-right, because they simply don’t have the budgets that Spinnaker or even Milligan has to usher their projects through the gauntlet of NIMBY nonsense.

          As a progressive, I deeply believe that we can’t JUST identify enemies and line them up against the proverbial wall. That’s a great way to destroy things, but progressivism is ultimately about building the future. I don’t see you as someone who wants to keep playing the same cynical games as Duff and the rest of the establishment cronies. But a good progressive needs to be able to see that establishment and its shibboleths as the reactionary, conservative force that it is, even if they dress everything up in the language and pieties of liberalism.

  8. Matthew Silber

    This rezoning pilot strikes me as positive-sum politics: win-win for everyone involved. Capping the number of units allowed per building is just asinine, and so are the parking mandates. It’s absurd to mandate parking in a historic downtown area, especially in a city like Norwalk that has connections to robust transit and is improving walkability every day.

    This rezoning overlay is a pilot, and I don’t see the harm in trying it for a few years, carefully monitoring developments, and reevaluating if necessary. The worst case scenario is no change occurs.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link