Quantcast

Haynie assails Mellion’s innovative program for Norwalk Title I families

Former Board of Education member Sue Haynie talks to the BoE about the Parents 4 Literacy 4 Their Children program in April.
Former Board of Education member Sue Haynie talks to the BoE about the Parents 4 Literacy 4 Their Children program in April.

NORWALK, Conn. — Norwalk’s most vulnerable children deserve better than they’re getting with an early literacy program designed by Norwalk Federation of Teachers President Bruce Mellion, former Board of Education member Sue Haynie said Wednesday.

In return, Mellion  attacked Haynie’s credibility, saying she is a “very negative person” and the program is on its way to national recognition.

Haynie has filed numerous Freedom of Information requests seeking information about the Literacy 4 Parents 4 Their Children program at Brookside Elementary School, a Mellion brainchild, coming to at least three BoE meetings to air her questions and complaints. The program was formed without any collaboration with Norwalk Public Schools staff or any of Norwalk’s early childhood education groups, Haynie said Wednesday.

Her overall goal is to get a good parent engagement component to the program, which is for Title I children, she said.

“Hopefully the new superintendent will garner some way to fund this, not only at the six Title I schools but at all the schools,” Haynie said. “But make it the best there is in the state, not something that gives lip service to parents, and is advantageous to the adults in the system but parents aren’t – the parents are getting food and some books and a clown but they’re not really getting the information that they need to help their kids, and I think that is shortchanging them.”

Mellion said it’s all about parent engagement.

“This is unique, the only program as far as we know in the entire country that works directly with parents to teach them how to engage with their own children in Pre-K through 3,” Mellion said. “Teaching parents, giving parents a skill of how to work with their children and it’s a parenting engagement program.”

Haynie filed an FOI request months ago seeking a copy of the curriculum for the program. She was told that was propriety information, which, she told the Board, was difficult to understand since it’s a taxpayer-funded program.

The curriculum was formed without any collaboration with the deputy superintendent’s office, the district’s instructional specialists in early childhood or English language arts, the Norwalk Early Childhood Council, Literacy How, Norwalk ACTS nor the state’s K-3 Literacy Initiative demonstration lab at Fox Run elementary School, she said.

She expressed these thoughts in a March 30 email to state officials, Norwalk interim Superintendent of Schools James Connelly, Deputy Superintendent Tony Daddona, BoE Chairman Mike Lyons and Mellion:

“If a teacher-focused program were being developed, Mr. Mellion would demand, as he should, teacher advocates be part of the process,” Haynie wrote. “Parents have every right to be represented with a commensurate level of advocacy and expertise – and that is not happening here. In any case, as a taxpayer-funded state program, shouldn’t collaboration and shared best practice be expected? … What started out as a well-intentioned program under the MOA with oversight controls appears to have turned into a privately run program designed by the NFT president with no input or sharing with NPS, literacy experts or parent advocates.”

“This is not a curriculum program directly for students,” Mellion said Wednesday. “… It’s unique unto itself and it’s not meant for those other things. It’s not meant for other teachers, it’s not meant for other entities that she’s talking about. The people who are doing it are exemplary, in terms of their background, their ability, their educational background. They are distinguished teachers and they are on a special program with the state Department of Education.”

He declined to identify who is teaching the program, saying he didn’t want to “draw them into this.”

An American Federation of Teachers story identifies the teachers as NFT union members Francine Hakim and Pamela Serlin.

As for the various education groups mentioned by Haynie, Mellion said, “If they had thought about this, maybe they would have done it. It was my idea and I did. It’s under a very small umbrella and it’s all done for parent engagement.”

Literacy 4 Parents 4 Their Children is not in alignment with the district curriculum and has no home/school connection, Haynie said.

“I think the program is positive and that anything that gets parents to read more with their children is a good thing,” Lyons said in an email. “I have told Bruce that I’d like to see the program coordinated with our K-5 Literacy initiative so they mesh, which I think would strengthen both programs.  I see no reason why that coordination can’t be a good next step.”

“This program is not a quality program but it’s expensive. We paid for it to get this going, and we basically paid for pablum,” Haynie said.

Haynie is not on the Board of Ed anymore, Mellion said.

“She has had a negative attitude – and I’ll use the word ‘hatred’ – to numerous people and she has demonstrated that hatred in particular toward Norwalk employees. That’s been longstanding,” Mellion said. “… In my opinion, it’s about me more than the program, but she’s camouflaged it.”

“I admire him, as what he does as a job, in terms of representing his members,” Haynie said. “He is paid 100 percent by his members and he does his job, he does a great job of it. I have no problem with someone doing their job well, I just want – there needs to be a balance. Someone needs to be on the other side making sure they’re advocating for the kids as strongly as he’s advocating for his members. That’s the problem. It’s imbalance. There’s nobody there that really watches out for the kids. … Parents have no union, no one person speaking up for them.”

“Haynie is just horribly wrong with her facts and what she’s doing,” Mellion said. “I’m going to say it again – it’s just so unfortunate that she’s always a force of negative and ‘what’s wrong and what’s bad.’ She goes around just trashing something that is just exemplary. We got it up and running really quickly and it’s really good. We didn’t have to go to all those other groups and organizations – it would have never gotten done.”

Not a bad thing that the NFT president thought of it, he said.

“We have exemplary people developing and working on it,” Mellion said. “I don’t have the background to do it but I am working with them to develop it in the name of parent engagement, for parents, in the best interest of students.”

There are budgetary concerns, Haynie said.

“The first thing that would go when times get tough would be the food and the entertainment,” Haynie said. “So the curriculum better be powerful, better be worth it, because think about it. When things are tough, for parent engagement pieces, the first things they cut out is going to be the nonessential stuff. So the curriculum needs to be great. It needs to be worth their time and it needs to help their kids.”

Parents are so grateful for the program that they come to him crying, Mellion said.

“We are not about closing the achievement gap,” Mellion said. “We are going on process of eliminating the achievement gap and never let it get started. I’ve got other ideas as well. … I believe that we can eliminate it if we work with parents and teach them how to work with their children in an effective way, everything that is being done is highly effective, proven and tested.”

Comments

23 responses to “Haynie assails Mellion’s innovative program for Norwalk Title I families”

  1. Marie Avila

    Bruce is a SHOP teacher, what would he know about literacy? He THINKS he knows a lot about everything, annoyed last Prez of NFEP, and now is part of the reason 2 current co-prezes are resigning. If he keeps being elected as Prez of NFT, fine, but he should be ignored when talking about actual academic subjects.

  2. Common Sense

    Haynie says: “Norwalk’s most vulnerable children deserve better than they’re getting…”

    I couldn’t agree more Sue, the only question is: where were you and this suggestion a year ago before this program was initiated? I don’t think I’ve ever heard an original idea come out of your mouth. The blunt truth is you’re a reactor, not a leader. And now you’re reacting to the success and publicity of the program in the way a jealous wanna-be would.

    We finally have a union leader and 2 teachers who don’t just punch a clock and do nothing more than what their contract requires, but go above and beyond to create a program with the intent to help our parents and children elevate not only their reading level, but their opportunities in life as well. And all you can do is criticize and say it’s not sufficient or appropriate?

    Which leads me to ask, just what are YOUR qualifications to make these judgements? Last I checked, you aren’t a teacher nor have you ever been one. Nor are you underprivileged. But you think you can speak authoritatively on the subject of literacy program created by teachers in the classroom every day dealing with not on the reading skills, but the life issues of underprivileged kids on a daily basis? Shame on you.

    The bottom line is: you’re a paper-pushing publicity hound using our children as a stepping stone for your public ambitions. It would be much better if you and all your cronies simply got out of the way and let educators with the training and skills necessary do SOMETHING original for our children in the hopes of raising not only their reading level, but their opportunities in life.

  3. LWitherspoon

    “This is unique, the only program as far as we know in the entire country that works directly with parents to teach them how to engage with their own children in Pre-K through 3,” Mellion said. “Teaching parents, giving parents a skill of how to work with their children and it’s a parenting engagement program.”

    I’d love to know what makes this program different from others such as Geoffrey Canada’s Harlem Children’s Zone, which runs a “Baby College” to teach young parents skills for reading and engaging with their children.

  4. MarjorieM

    Common Sense, you are so right! Bravo for speaking up!!!

  5. Sara Sikes

    Norwalk BOE Needs Transparency
    Bruce Mellion acting hateful towards a parent advocate is unfortunately nothing new, as well as the Norwalk BOE not complying with FOI. This has happened in past years but I have to wonder why it’s happening now when so many good programs have been started at NPS. Why the secrecy? Chairman Michael Lyons is well versed in FOI requirements so its time to invite the FOI Director here for a workshop so that all concerned staff (including Bruce Mellion) can have a refresher course. Other city departments did this a few months ago, so why not the BOE? There is no need for this negative publicity unless there is something to hide.

  6. Educator

    Ms. Haynie continues with her vicious attacks against Mr. Mellion. If you all remember her speech during the last BOE debates, she never cited any of her accomplishments only her hatred towards Mr. Mellion.

    @Common Sense, I also agree with you. What makes her an expert on the subject matter. This project is working as well as receiving national acclaim. Maybe she is jealous of the program’s success?

    Ms. Haynie, I would tread lightly on this one and just let it go. You may be surprised at what you discover when you “follow the money”.

  7. dawn

    As a parent who has attended every session od the literacy program I have a few things to say. I am not a teacher. I am not an expert in literacy. So I will not judge the program as a whole or the motives behind it.

    My children are lucky. I love to read. We read all the time.

    1. Have I learned anything earth shattering? No
    2. Are there people in the room who need to hear the information? Yes
    3. Are all the people who need to hear the information in the room? No

    I feel that a lot of these programs tell me what I already know. I am an involved parent. There are a lot of people, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, who do not know they need to read to their kids. They think that watching a book on the iPad is reading. Some of these people are not the underprivileged either.

    There can never be enough people out there telling us to read to your kids. Interact with your kids. Talk to the teacher.

    There are a lot of people who do not know the very basic skills of how to support their children’s learning. If more people truly understood they might do a better job.

    How many times have we all said you need a license to drive a car but anyone can have a kid. It is the hardest job ever and there are no requirements.

  8. Lisa Thomson

    Thank you Sue for looking into this and Dawn for your observations and comments. Perhaps the biggest eye-opener is how Mr. Mellion’s ‘brainchild’ (I think it was originally part of Rivera’s Strategic Literacy Plan) EXCLUDED every literacy expert in the city. Very Sad!

  9. MarjorieM

    “. Perhaps the biggest eye-opener is how Mr. Mellion’s ‘brainchild’ (I think it was originally part of Rivera’s Strategic Literacy Plan) EXCLUDED every literacy expert in the city. Very Sad!”

    This quote from the person whom, I believe, fully supported the choice of K-5 literacy books that the Board wanted over the very different choice of the literacy experts?

  10. If I might chime in as just another concerned parent (who will have a child in the Norwalk public schools until 2033 and who reads to him every day- if any one is asking).

    If the program is flawed for not having any coordination with central office administrators, then shouldn’t the questions be directed to, I don’t know, the Superintendent who would have allowed the project to proceed (and who is/was the boss of those teachers and the administrators who were not consulted)?

    Admittedly, I haven’t been on the BoE for a couple of years, but last I knew, a union president doesn’t have the authority to put teachers on special assignment with the state’s Commissioner of Education. That sort of high-level contact is usually made at the highest levels. And, although I only briefly worked with Dr. Rivera, I never got the impression that he would have ceded his authority over such a high-profile literacy program to a union boss with no literacy experience. That would be like allowing people with no teaching experience to dictate a curriculum choice against the advice of experts . . .

  11. Joanna Cooper

    Ms. Haynie, thank you for your advocacy on behalf of students and parents. I share your passion and concern that our school system provide quality literacy programs to our students Your goal to see that the Title I children “Parents 4 Literacy 4 Their Children” program is a quality literacy program that provides a good parent engagement component to Title I children is appreciated and it seems is Mr. Mellion’s goal as well. However, his statements and actions seem to demonstrate otherwise and I clearly understand and share your concern.

    Students need quality research based reading programs. Mr. Mellion claims with his program, “everything that is being done is highly effective, proven and tested.” That is what we want when our tax dollars are paying for it. I’d like to see the DATA that shows this program is highly effective, tested and proven as he claims. I’m curious how can it be proven to work if its brand new and created by a couple of teachers?

    I don’t suppose Mr. Mellion would share that DATA. Since he won’t share or allow Ms. Haynie to look at the curriculum. It seems even with an FOI she could not get a look at it. Mr. Mellion’s response is, “This is not a curriculum program directly for students,” My question is if it’s not for students why are we paying for it? Is it to educate the parents? Mr. Mellion continues, “… It’s unique unto itself and it’s not meant for those other things. It’s not meant for other teachers, it’s not meant for other entities that she’s talking about. The people who are doing it are exemplary, in terms of their background, their ability, their educational background. They are distinguished teachers and they are on a special program with the state Department of Education.”

    I agree Mr. Mellion’s program is unique for sure. So unique and special that there will be no sharing with other teachers? What is the point of not sharing? This is a red flag. It’s a pilot program. Typically pilot programs that are good and working well are shared. That is the reason why they are created. The lack of collaboration is a real concern. That doesn’t follow best practices. If a program is on the up and up there should be no problem with sharing. In fact one would think he would be eager to share. All other curriculums being used in the system are available to look at why not his? He further didn’t want to share who is teaching the program. Really? That’s odd those teachers should be speaking at the BoE on its value and sharing their tips. Why the secrecy Mr. Mellion?

    Something is fishy and it seems Ms. Haynie has hit a nerve. One can see this by Mr. Mellion’s reaction towards Ms. Haynie. It’s incredibly bullying and egocentric. He attacks her aggressively even more than he extols the virtues of his program. Going as far as saying, “In my opinion, it’s about me more than the program, but she’s camouflaged it.” Nice try with a nasty aggressive offensive but I’m sorry that falls flat with everything I know about real research based reading programs.

    My first impression of this program was that it was fluff with not much substance to begin with. It appears to me it is a attempt to give the appearance of generously helping students and parents when in fact they are being shortchanged. It seems like a good idea, seems reasonable but I am concerned that it is not really research based and NOT a substitute for delivering real researched based programs in school. Sure parents can always use some tips and reading materials to share with their kids but that is no substitute for real research based reading programs which Norwalk historically has lacked because they are not available, in short supply or inadequate. Additionally putting in place real researched based reading programs has been fought by the union. I think we can and should do better. Where is the beef Mr. Mellion? Where is the DATA and the curriculum? Why are you not sharing? What are you hiding?

    The teachers teaching this program maybe distinguished teachers and teachers working on a special program with the state department of education but that doesn’t necessarily mean they have the qualifications to teach literacy. Keep at it Ms. Haynie something is not right. The lack of transparency, the secrecy and the push back from Mr. Mellion tells me this is the case. I want a look at that curriculum and the fact the public can’t get a look at it is a BIG problem and a HUGE red flag.

    Ms. Haynie thank for shedding light on this program and asking questions. I look forward to follow up reporting on this issue. I would like to Mr. Mellion comply with the FOI and share the curriculum and additionally the data. The BoE should be asking for it as well. Don’t let Mr. Mellion off the hook. Keep at Ms. Haynie parents and students deserve transparency and it should not be a problem to achieve that. When it is there is something wrong.

  12. MarjorieM

    This is ridiculous! A program to help title I parents is mandated by federal law. The law does not state how this is to be done, but it is to be accomplished. Read the federal law for yourself! To state that a model program is questionable, when it is under the guidance of the State Department of Education with the help of exemplary teachers, is most certainly an attack on Bruce Melion. Apples and their friends, get out of the way of progress!

  13. Sue Haynie

    Why do I care? I’m paying it forward.

    I know the value of quality parent engagement programs. My two dyslexic kids were still reading at kindergarten levels, after 4 and 5 years in school. They’d had preschool, were read to, museums, libraries, had caring teachers, got special ed. Parent engagement programs that gave me valuable, pertinent information were not easy to find, Norwalk PS had none. And, at first, I didn’t even know where to look or what to ask for. I wasted years—of Their time.

    I also know the value of quality reading assessments and how confusing it can be for a parent to figure out what they mean. All 12 Norwalk elementary schools had mCLASS Reading 3D assessments for their K-3 students this year. mCLASS provides a Home Connect letter for parents, at least 3 times a year, that shows them how their child is doing in foundational reading skills. The letter contains clear but detailed explanations of the assessments and a visual with Red, Yellow and Green fields and a ‘little running man’. If the ‘little running man’ is in the Red or Yellow field of a particular assessment, the child is having problems in that foundational skill.I was not lucky enough to have this kind of information available to me when my kids were in elementary school. Parents need to know what these assessments mean;the explanation is not simple. Most, but not all, Norwalk schools were giving this ‘little running men’ page to their parents for the last year or more. The Title 1 School where Literacy 4 Parents 4 Their Children was piloted is one of the schools that wasn’t.

  14. Sue Haynie

    MarjorieM

    You are mistaken. The program is not under the guidance of the State. To quote the State of Connecticut Dept. of Ed Communication Director, “….. ‘Literacy 4 Parents 4 Their Children’ is unrelated to their state work responsibilities. We do not monitor or have any oversight of their district work and responsibilities.”

    Agreed, parent engagement is part of Federal Title 1 and IDEA as well as the Connecticut K-3 Literacy Initiative (CK3LI). The laws may not state ‘how this should be done’, but I am of the opinion that it should be done very, very well.

  15. Dawn

    We get the running man letter at Brookside.

  16. Joanna Cooper

    Marj M
    If it is a model program and working so well then why wouldn’t Mr. Mellion want to share the data and the curriculum? If it is so good it should be implemented at all the Title l schools. One would think that would be his goal to expand on his successful program.

    I want transparency. Ms. Haynie is right if it was any body else’s program Mr. Mellion would demand teacher advocates be involved. Parents need representation too. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Like Ms. Haynie I am an educated mother who’s child struggled to learn to read in NPS because adequate appropriate data driven research based programs were not in place. I have learned not to trust blindly. Where is the DATA?

    I am watching and also paying it forward. I don’t want to see NPS failing anymore kids when it comes to reading. I want to be sure students and parents are receiving the help they are supposed to. I speak for those that don’t have a voice, that are less educated and don’t have the financial means to pay for help. I know the Union does not represent our children. However, it might be a fantastic program but apparently that can’t be truly confirmed because there is no transparency.

  17. Sue Haynie

    Dawn, yes you’re right. My apologies, I should have been clearer. My comment was not meant to be a reflection of why a particular school or school leader did or did not provide the ‘little running men’ to parents since Central Office didn’t require it be done consistently across the district until February 4th, when an email was sent out saying such. Some parents got these reports for the first time at March conferences. Literacy 4 Parents 4 Their Children (L4P4TC) used the Brookside gym but was not in any other way a part of the school besides parents being invited to the events.

    My point was why would a pilot program called Literacy 4 Parents 4 Their Children not be designed to include LOTS of support and explanations to parents as to what these mCLASS Reading assessments mean since they measure ‘Literacy’? All 12 schools use it, mCLASS is part of Norwalk’s 10 Point Literacy Strategy, and it’s one of four reading assessments choices that Must be used for priority districts like Norwalk per the State DOE. (BTW, it’s not an added assessment, it replaced the DRA which had been the reading assessment in district for years.)

    What is a formative assessment? Why is it important? Phonemic awareness or the alphabetic principal? Why are these two things so important for fluency and comprehension? Those are loaded questions and most parents have little or no clue as to what they mean; I know I sure didn’t.

    An ideal place to answer some of those questions would be at a parent engagement program about early literacy!

  18. Hobbes the Calvinist

    When Sue Haynie says “Central Office didn’t require it be done consistently”, doesn’t she mean “Manny River didn’t require it be done consistently”?

    When will Sue Haynie, Lisa Thompson and their alter-egos on this site admit that Rivera and Marks weren’t perfect?

    Any one seeing shades of the parking space dispute in “A Bronx Tale”?

  19. Mr. Ludlow

    What did Manny Rivera know and when did he know it?

    Who was superintendent when Reading 4 Parents got started? Manny Rivera.

    Who was superintendent when the two teachers were being paid extra money to plan parent meetings? Manny Rivera.

    Who was the boss of these teachers? Manny Rivera.

    Who was the boss of the reading specialists and curriculum specialists in the Norwalk Public Schools who should have been consulted about the program? Manny Rivera.

    Who had the power to order the teachers and experts to coordinate for the Reading 4 Parents program? Manny Rivera.

    Who will never be blamed for his mistakes? Manny Rivera.

  20. Sue Haynie

    Hobbes:
    Inconsistency in practice in Norwalk pre-date Marks, who started in 2010, and Rivera who came in 2013.

    Per the 2012 CREC report , ‘inconsistencies in process existed from school to school and were still problematic in the district’, showing no change from the 2008 CREC report.

    At a meeting in January at NCC with the State of CT M.O.R.E. Commission on SPED, a Norwalk SPED administrator mentioned the continued ‘inconsistency’ between schools in implementation of SRBI, noting that training had been given but that directives from Central Office hadn’t been followed at the school level.

    At a January BOE Curriculum meeting, it was stated that mCLASS assessments were given out to all K-3 parents 3 times a year. In a follow up email, the Deputy Superintendent clarified that it is ‘present practice’ but not policy. Further inquiries revealed that ‘present practice’ is inconsistent. On February 4th, the Deputy Superintendent sent in email to all elementary Principals & Asst. Principals requiring that mCLASS assessments be given to all K-3 parents.

    What has been consistent in NPS since the first 2008 CREC report? The NFT and NASA presidents and the Deputy Superintendent have had the same jobs—three people who have had power and control over curriculum, instruction, all principals, administrators and all teachers.

  21. Concerned

    “This is unique, the only program as far as we know in the entire country that works directly with parents to teach them how to engage with their own children in Pre-K through 3,” Mellion said. THE ‘ENTIRE COUNTRY” !!!! OMG – DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS! Ludicrous that Mellion would make such a statement – ‘smoke and mirrors’ for sure.

    Trying to get the straight story is not negative – it’s just trying to get the straight story so parents and taxpayers actually know what’s going on in the NPS. Just try getting and reliable straightforward data out of the NPS on anything other than basic census figures – almost impossible. Updating data was one of the requirements needed to improve the NPS school district’s DRG standing, and clearly it’s not being done.

  22. Steve Colarossi

    You do appreciate, don’t you, that your screed regarding “Literacy 4 Parents 4 Children” is about a program that is supposed to help parents of very young children learn some skills so that they can help their children become readers. It’s not designed to teach parents how to analyze standardized test scores, and it’s not designed to promote consistent modalities of instruction to special education students (although I do suspect, and I doubt I’m alone, that the program materials deliver subliminal pro-union messages).

    Now, in addition to criticizing this program for not doing what it wasn’t intended to do, you also criticized it for not being coordinated with Norwalk’s curriculum and for not involving Norwalk’s curricular administrators. Yet in your last post, you then singled-out the Deputy Superintendent (who’s responsible for curriculum) and blamed him for not assuring consistency of the program from whose development you acknowledged he had been excluded. But, you absolved his last two bosses (who both had the authority and the overwhelming majority of votes on the BOE) for failing to maintain the type of “consistency” you claim has been lacking between our schools. It seems a tad inconsistent to blame one administrator for all of Norwalk’s ills, but not apportion any blame to his bosses (who either deserve rebuke for not doing a better job of supervising their deputy or for actually thinking that he was doing a good job).

    Certainly, you can overlook the support Supt. Rivera gave to this program and the obvious fact that he approved its implementation. And, you can ignore Supt. Rivera’s including this program among his initiatives (as was highlighted in his evaluation by the BOE). But, if you want to engender a public debate about the best ways to close the word-gap that exists between the young children of less-affluent and more-affluent families, you should focus on the materials being provided to parents and whether there is a better way for folks to seamlessly involve their young children in a print-rich environment. It is interesting that you deflected attention from the simple facts that you are trying to criticize a program strongly supported and implemented by Supt. Rivera without criticizing him. It is equally fascinating that you would fault the teachers who developed this program for not having strong enough literacy credentials yet you relentlessly supported the former Nathan Hale Middle School literacy program that impermissibly removed struggling students from their English Language Arts classes and placed them in a class being taught by someone who was not certified to teach English Language Arts. I’m sure it’s different—after all, Norwalk has never been threatened with a loss of funding by the state’s Department of Education for the Literacy 4 Parents program.

    Perhaps the inconsistency of your diatribe isn’t the issue- rather we should reject a literacy program that could be helping parents simply because it doesn’t do everything someone with no background in education thinks it should be doing. The fact that it was supported by a union president (among others) seems like all the more reason to reject it without any meaningful examination of its potential benefits to families in need of literacy support. Of course, that sort of personality-based, damn-the-consequences, vendetta-based decision-making is the true epitome of the Old Norwalk Way and something that Norwalk’s students are better off is less prevalent on the current BOE.

  23. Sue Haynie

    Steve,

    No one knows what Literacy 4 Parents 4 Their Children was ‘designed’ for, including NPS.

    The 1st session of Literacy 4 Parents was June 2014 to address summer loss. That made sense.

    Rivera hired a K-5 literacy specialist at the end of August; the Connecticut K-3 Literacy Initiative (CK3LI) Demo School at Fox Run, with a parent engagement piece, was new and ready for the 2014/15 school year. Those two ‘assets’ brand new, the 2nd session of Literacy 4 Parents was September 12th.

    Rivera gave his resignation in November, was gone by the end of January.

    What happened between September and March, when the 3rd Literacy 4 Parents presentation took place?

    I think you are suggesting that while Rivera was here, he was supposed to bring in the money, the talent, the assets, and manage the details too. Given that, why pay $225,000 for a #2 then?

    Although Superintendent Rivera had many talents, mind reading and predicting the future were probably not included. I don’t think he imagined that the opportunity that was presented, a funded, joint effort between the NFT and NPS, would be abused in the way that it has been.

    Inconsistency is a problem in Norwalk, documented in a variety of 3rd party reports over the last 8 years.

    What’s been consistent in NPS since the first 2008 CREC report? The NFT and NASA presidents and the Deputy Superintendent have had the same jobs—three people who have had power and control over curriculum, instruction, all principals, administrators and all teachers.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link