Quantcast

Norwalk recycling contamination rate at 19%, below national average

NORWALK, Conn. — Nearly one in five items placed in Norwalk’s recycling bins in 2024 could not be recycled, though the city’s contamination rate remains well below the national average, according to a city audit.

The audit found that, while the national average contamination rate was around 35%, the contamination rate for items collected in Norwalk’s recycling program was 19%.

Norwalk’s contamination rate means nearly one in five items placed in recycling bins cannot be processed and must be removed during sorting, adding to disposal costs and reducing the program’s efficiency.

Mayor Barbara Smyth said recycling plays a critical role in reducing those costs and protecting environmental resources.

“Here in Norwalk, by making recycling, reusing, and reducing a priority, we are investing in a cleaner, more sustainable future for our community now and for the next generation,” Smyth said.

Recycling tips from Norwalk

City officials said reducing contamination depends largely on resident behavior.

Thomas Szabo, Norwalk’s waste and recycling program manager, offered several tips for improving recycling practices:

  1. Recycle only what is accepted
  2. Empty and rinse your containers, and keep them loose to avoid jamming sorting equipment
  3. Focus on the bottles and tubs

Szabo said, “Residents should contact customer service if they have questions on recycling eligibility for their residence,” in a statement.

What Can — and Can’t — Be Recycled in Norwalk

City guidance breaks recycling into four main categories: paper, plastic, glass, and metal — with strict limits on what is accepted.

For paper, residents can recycle items such as cardboard, newspapers, magazines, and office paper, as well as pizza boxes, provided they are grease-free. Items like tissues, paper towels, napkins, and food-soiled paper are not accepted.

Plastic recycling is limited to bottles, containers, tubs, and lids. Plastic bags, wrap, foam containers, and single-use coffee pods are not recyclable through the city’s program.

Glass recycling includes bottles and jars but excludes items such as drinking glasses, ceramics, windows, and light bulbs.

For metal, residents can recycle aluminum foil, cans, and empty aerosol containers. Scrap metal, cookware, and small metal items are not accepted.

Credit: City of Norwalk

Across all categories, contamination often comes from food residue or items that resemble recyclables but cannot be processed through standard facilities.

Where Recycling Goes After Collection

After collection, materials are transported to a regional materials recovery facility in Stamford, where recyclables are sorted by type.

“After sorting, materials are compacted into large, dense bales by commodity type,” Szabo added.

Marketable materials are then sold and sent to manufacturers to be turned into new products, while non-recyclable or contaminated material [are] removed during sorting.

 Norwalk sent 8,737 tons of recyclables to the Taylor Reed Material Recovery Facility in Stamford in the 2024 to 2025 fiscal year.

Reducing by Reusing

Szabo advised residents that avoiding single-use and non-recyclable items is the best way to reduce costs associated with waste and recycling management.

“Recycling is the last step, not the first.”

City of Norwalk Waste Programs Manager, Thomas Szabo

The Norwalk Transfer Station and Food Scrap Recycling Stations

Szabo invited residents to use Norwalk’s transfer station and the food scrap recycling stations.

The city’s website indicated that the stations are located at:

  • The main entrance of Cranbury Park  (open daily, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.)
  • Behind the library at the Rowayton Community Center (open on Mondays from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.)
  • 61 Crescent Street (open Monday to Friday 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and on Saturday from 7:30 a.m to 2 p.m.)

Residents must have a disposal pass to use the transfer station on Crescent Street, according to Norwalk’s website.

Comments

3 responses to “Norwalk recycling contamination rate at 19%, below national average”

  1. Becca Stoll

    1. Cranbury is misspelled.

    2. On the subject of recycling paper products, remember that the “soiled” products mentioned (tissues, napkins, paper towels) CAN be composted, as long as they are not dyed.

    3. It would be great for Norwalk to consider adding more compost drop-off locations that can be accessed without a car. 61 Crescent Street is the easiest one to get to by bus, and it still involves a 10 minute walk at the end.

    1. Peter Marino

      lol You have good intentions but no one is getting on a bus and paying a fare, to go drop wet paper towels off.

  2. Steve Bouza

    I wish the town would provide a more comprehensive list of recyclables. I understand the desire to keep the list short and concise so residents willingly follow it (unlike my comment). But for those that bother to take an extra 30 seconds to look something up, why not be explicit? A 19% discard rate, let’s call it a B-, seems like there is a big margin for improvement which would benefit both the city and its residents. A little more public education in this area could go a long way (and thanks for posting this article to raise awareness).

    I’ve seen some conflicting information circulated on the city’s social media, specifically there was a post around the holidays regarding wrapping paper. The social media post says to throw it in the garbage, the city website/this article says it’s recyclable, and the Win-waste website (formerly called Taylor recycling facility) says it’s recyclable but only without glitter. I think the Win-waste is the most accurate, since it’s literally the facility that processes the waste. My point being, consistency in messaging is important.

    I don’t think these are particularly difficult items to address. A supplementary list posted to the city’s website would be an easy first step and possibly reduce repetitive questions fielded by customer service. I’d wager the sorting facility has the information readily available too. A visual list would be another suggestion to make the list easier to interpret for some.

    And lastly, please make at least one reference to the plastic identification numbers somewhere in the guidance. These are often misconstrued as meaning the item is recyclable and worsens the discard rate. (The identification numbers are intentionally misleading by the oil/plastic industry, but that’s a separate topic in itself.)

    I will do my part by relaying these suggestions to the town, but hopefully this public discourse is helpful.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link