Quantcast

Opinion: The case of art in context – Part I

Sherelle Harris
Sherelle Harris

Updated 3:13 p.m. Wednesday with minor edits.

Sherelle Harris (D-At Large) is a member of the Board of Education and the assistant director of the Norwalk Public Library System

I thought I could have a palatable discussion with the Norwalk Arts Commission about the message Justin Gruelle’s WPA mural, “Steamboat Days on the Mississippi” (ala Mark Twain), sends as it hangs in Norwalk’s City Hall today. I will suffice it say that, while some “got it” and I even gained a new friend (Tony Velez mark 26:22), some clearly did not. I could barely begin before being interrupted. Tony offered his support and his follow-ups were unlike one person’s who included me in the group’s email about a proposed lecture on (let’s say it all together) race, led by (let’s say it all together) a Black man.

Justin Gruelle’s WPA mural, “Steamboat Days on the Mississippi”
Justin Gruelle’s WPA mural, “Steamboat Days on the Mississippi”

I get the feeling that some feel it is acceptable to discuss race only if they orchestrate and control both the discussion and the speaker who will understand, no doubt, that any acrimony had better be handled with trivial and saccharine anecdotes.

I was included in another email that had clips of an inter-racial couple who joked about everything, including (let’s say it all together) race. I decided I should give Jason L. Riley’s book “PLEASE STOP HELPING US” a read after all, due to my budding disenchantment with wanna-be progressive folk who prefer Blacks that are biddable.

I remember the first time I read, with an open mind, Flannery O’Connor’s “The Artificial Nigger.” It was a good exercise for me. I wonder if those who want to fall under entitlement’s hegemony are secure enough to come outside of self-sameness. While I prefer cultural art, I grew up in a home with landscape art and I learned to appreciate other styles of art and artists such as Monet, his water lilies in particular, and Michelangelo, the creation of Adam in particular.  I’ve read Hemingway, Bronte, Twain, et al. and respected their unique capturing, in words, the times in which they lived, just as I both respect and relate to the work of William Wells Brown, Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Bessie Head, Chinua Achebe, Pearl Cleage, J. California Cooper, Carter G. Woodson et al.

There are others I also appreciate like Anne Moody, whose book “Coming of Age in Mississippi” gives raw, unapologetic insight into the wretchedness she lived through in Mississippi during the 1950s and 1960s as the great-granddaughter or great-great granddaughter of the African Americans depicted in the Twainian painting. The pain was not pretty. The villains were not neatly packaged.

A gentleman who belongs to the same church as I sang “Ol’ Man River” during Black History Month. That song, about African American life on the Mississippi River, made me think of the Twainian painting and how this man’s voice could bring God, Himself, to earth to breathe life into the valley of the dry bones. I also thought of those resilient people depicted in the painting and wondered of the lives of my ancestors prior to being brought to America.

My favorite song, “Many Rains Ago,” from the soundtrack of Alex Haley’s “Roots,” also came to mind. While “Roots” tells the story of Haley’s maternal family, “Queen” tells the story of his paternal family. I am so grateful that Mr. Haley brought the oral history and well-researched lives of his ancestors to the American people.

A City of Norwalk employee asked another City of Norwalk employee and me, while viewing the Twainian piece, if we were upset because the figures are so dark, some with elongated arms and ape-like features. I thought about it. Some people’s pain is other people’s profit and glory, obsession even. My simple response: “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That is not where my upset lies.”

My upset lies in what the picture represents, boldly standing in the background as a tenet or norm in City Hall in 2016. The controversy over the Confederate flag’s hanging on South Carolina’s statehouse grounds caused its removal. But the south stands in Norwalk’s City Hall. It is not spectacular artwork on the surface, but there is an honesty in its muted pink, grey, blue and brown background in contrast to the dulled vibrancy of its bolder foreground. I think it captures well the time when blacks were looked upon as subhuman in America and whites reaped the benefits of their chattel status. This piece, however, no longer hangs in Norwalk City Hall by happenstance. It now deliberately hangs there.

Let me put it in context. An elderly Jewish woman who took a liking to my children’s work asked me not to use the word ghetto. She said it conjures bad memories for her. It bothered her. I respected her wishes and didn’t use the word around her again. Simple.

My point: If the Twainian piece were among the depiction of other cultures that have endured horrific moments in history, it would have context. If it were in the Mark Twain Boyhood Home & Museum in Hannibal, Mo., the Mark Twain Library in Redding, or The Mark Twain House & Museum in Hartford, it would have context. My upset lies in the bold indifference to what the picture represents out of context. Picture Sara Baartman (the “Hottentot Venus”). Think Henrietta Lacks. We – another Norwalk resident, who is one of the aforementioned City of Norwalk employees, decided together to ask for a subsequent meeting that included a slightly bigger circle of people. We discussed having another piece put in place of the Twainian piece. Two members of the Norwalk Historical Society, one of whom is also on the Norwalk Arts Commission, agreed that there are many other pieces in storage that can easily go in its place. When we left that meeting, it was a matter of where the piece would be placed.

Somehow things changed. I get the feeling someone(s) want to turn this into a cruel play of power.

I tried reasoning the opposition to replacing it with another piece of art. A member of a local church reminded me that Connecticut is about the Underground Railroad – with a reported stop in Norwalk – not life on the Mississippi. Prior to that reminder, I began viewing WPA murals in other places. I stopped when I arrived at Harlem Hospital’s depiction of blacks in WPA murals (see here and here). I thought, in focusing on Connecticut history, that the Amistad case, which occurred six years after Twain’s birth, is just as much a part of Connecticut history as Twain. In the introduction to his book “Connecticut in the American Civil War,” Central Connecticut State University Professor Matthew Warshauer wrote: The famed abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison – outraged by attacks on Prudence Crandall’s school for black girls and the decision by the town of Canterbury and the state to close the school – derisively referred to Connecticut as the “Georgia of New England.” More than one historian has noted that of the New England states, Connecticut was “the most inhospitable” to abolition. It is not that abolition failed to have a foothold in Connecticut. Rather, support for abolition was not nearly as widespread as many today believe. Moreover, whatever the number of abolitionists, there were many more in the state who actively opposed the end of slavery and black equality.

I looked to the current State of Connecticut. I wanted to see what Governor Malloy, et al., were up to in regard to race relations. I found some dignity in the State Historic Preservation Plan 2011 – 2016 on pages 19 and 20.

There seems to be something to be proud of for the cultures represented in Connecticut, similar to the window treatments decorated with the various cultures and their percentages represented in Norwalk in the recently relocated and remodeled Norwalk Historical Society Museum.  I first visited to hear local researcher and historian Madeline Eckhert’s lecture, Discovering 18th Century Norwalk Black History. Ms. Eckhert handled the very delicate subject of my people with a sincere heart. It took me back to when the South Norwalk Branch Library honored Midge Unger, a Jewish woman who had recently passed, as part of a 2013 Black History Month program.

In 1970, when Midge was a teacher at Benjamin Franklin Middle School, she had students research and interview for what became the booklet “Black People Making History in Norwalk.”  That was ultimate respect. Honoring her was a return on that respect.  These are the types of people who make the world a better place. These are the types of people I want to be around, not those with the hubris to think they can dictate to other races, control their heroes, or think they know better what is best for them.  There is something empty and miserable in that type of mindset.

Despite my/our not being given the same courtesy by some of those involved in the two meetings, while writing this piece I thought of the feelings of Paul Smart, Mr. Gruelle’s nephew who donated to the City of Norwalk in 2011 his uncle’s paintings, images, books, sheet music covers, etc. I know his uncle means as much to him and his family as my ancestors mean to me. I have nothing against Mr. Gruelle. I owned and loved my Raggedy Ann and Andy dolls as a young girl.

I was fascinated when I visited the Norwalk Museum, then located on the corner of Marshall and North Main Streets, and learned the history of the dolls. I do recall reading, however, that Mr. Smart said the donated pieces should be housed in Norwalk close to the Silvermine Guild Arts Center where his dad and two uncles spent their creative years. The Twainian piece, which has been in City Hall for many years, has traveled around Norwalk a time or two before landing there. Norwalk surely isn’t stuck on Black subservience. Stagnant water stinks. There is a touting of revival in the school system, a new curriculum, new textbooks. Why not have a different representation of African Americans in City Hall artwork, particularly if African Americans respectfully request it?

Finally, I have nothing against Twain. I believe he delved into the human condition in his book “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.” While the teacher’s guide as written on pbs.org explains the pros and cons of the book, ultimately, I think what the champions of the novel say, “It is a satire, a scathing attack on the hypocrisy and prejudice of a society that pretends to honor virtue while condoning slavery,” can be compared to present racial tensions. One person argued that “Huck” cared nothing for blacks or their plight, and that his relationship grows only with Jim, not his outlook on slavery.

Mark Twain is quoted as saying, “Huck Finn is a book of mine about a boy with a sound heart and a deformed conscience that come into conflict and the conscience suffers defeat.”  Our conscience is formed by the society in which we live.

We can’t change history. Even the film “The Birth of a Nation” has its place in time, but I guess I wonder how long we will discuss race before we act on race respectfully. Are Blacks to “step and fetch” for human dignity? A paradox if ever there was one.

I don’t need to continually discuss race. I know when I’m in the company of good people, just as my ancestors knew when they were in the company of Quakers, Abolitionists, even former racists whose hearts had been converted.

I think of my late father when I am watching old shows he loved, like the sitcom “Sanford and Son.”

I love to laugh, not the diplomatic chuckle or the reserved chortle, but the genuine guffaw brought on Chris Rock, Sinbad, and family members. So how about this? Every time someone has racist overtones, or someone accuses others of being racist, or denies being racist, or is just plain insensitive, I will clutch my heart like the character “Fred Sanford,” take a few steps forward, a few steps backward and say, “I’m comin’ to join you, daddy.” I will be the one inside the ripples of the sun, moving from the merry-go-round on race, to slide down patience and swing toward time, leaving the dead to bury their own.

Comments

28 responses to “Opinion: The case of art in context – Part I”

  1. One Person’s Perspective

    It is amazing to me that Ms. Harris, who is in the business of helping people to learn, wouldn’t be able to say what she means without the verbal maze I had to wander through to understand what her point was. The elimination of the first 8 paragraphs and most of what follows after the 9th could be deleted and her point would be ever so much clearer and would save me the headache. One might come away with the conclusion that the author values obfuscation over clarity, or maybe just believes that more equals better, or is simply impressed with all those words.

    So: here we are, ensconced firmly in the embrace of wanna-be nanny statism in the form of “well, I’m offended because this (only because it’s seen out of the context of other horrors perpetrated on humanity) work of art shouldn’t be something that the City of Norwalk displays as part of its cultural heritage.” Unlike the Confederate flag, which is a symbol for the entire notion of whites dominating blacks, this mural was presumably created as an illustration of the world the Twain created in verse to help the reader see that world in their mind’s eye. Anyone without an agenda to pursue would probably see it the same way.

    Ms. Harris, what is your next step? Eliminating all written works that feature the N word from the library? I believe there was a film made back in the 60’s that dealt with such a notion: Farenheit 451. If you haven’t seen it, it’s a chilling account of what happens when a tyrannical goverment decides what is fit for literary public consumption. I’m sure Twain himself would have something amusing to contribute to this discussion, being a keen observer of the ironical.

  2. young@heart

    Thank you, Sherelle. You are clearly a lover of the written and spoken word. Your courage to bring the light and the dark, no matter how uncomfortable it may be, especially among so much apathetic silence and/or righteous indignation, is appreciated.

  3. Peter F

    Pet peeve: Fahrenheit 451 is a book (thankfully assigned to Norwalk High School students, once apon a time.) The film came later. But the point is taken.

  4. Mae1

    Ms. Sherelle I wanted to say thank you. Well stated and I get the point and I do agree.

  5. One Person’s Perspective

    @Peter F: thanks for the reminder. It was the film I saw first as a child and so that was what made such as strong impression on me. Come to think of it, around the same time I saw To Kill a Mockingbird, which also made an indelible impression on my young mind.

  6. Tony Velez

    The essence of the issue that Sherelle addresses is that the only representation of African Americans in Norwalk City Hall is that of slaves. The collection of WPA murals displayed throughout the building have their place within a historical context of the 1930’s when they were made. The world is a very different place today, and our city hall collection of permanent art is dated, unrepresentative of all that Norwalk is today. The extensive WPA collection of paintings simply portrays the Black persons experience in America negatively and is offensive to to her, and to many other Norwalk residents. Thanks to Sherelle for bringing up this issue, especially in light of the myriad negative reactions emerging. Tony Velez

  7. Bob Welsh

    One Person’s Perspective:

    As a white man, it’s hard for me to know what Sherelle Harris experiences when she sees “Steamboat Days on the Mississippi” hanging in City Hall.

    Nevertheless, I flexed my empathy muscles and here’s the best I came up with. Let’s say my Uncle regularly hit my Aunt. Would I want a photo of the act hanging as art in the halls of a government building? Slavery was long-term violent subjugation of African Americans by others in their human family. Light-skinned humans denied the inherent dignity and worth of darker-skinned humans, and regularly committed unspeakable acts towards them. If an African-American whose ancestors suffered under slavery says images of that ugly history cause her pain, who am I to deny it? Who am I to suggest that she’s a little too sensitive, because bad things happen, so we’ll keep the painful image on display in our City Hall, thank you very much?

    Images are more powerful than words. What hangs in a buliding dedicated to our shared governance has special meaning. So let’s err on the side of kindness. We may not be able to fully comprehend Sherelle’s point of view, but at the very least we can acknowledge that we prefer not to cause each other pain during our brief time together. Luckily there is an easy solution: carefully store “Steamboat Days on the Mississippi” and in its place hang art that better reflects the racial harmony to which we now aspire.

  8. Keep It Real 100%

    If a painting in city hall offends ANYONE and it can be easily removed, move it and put something else there, after all residents own the building and pay those employed there.
    Why has it even gotten to this point, my guess would be that the person who decided not to move it may not be sensitive to the feelings of others in this instance, or a power trip.
    Quit fooling around, move it and then we can move on, this is not changing the name of an NFL team we are talking about here folks.
    Ms. Harris has a valid argument, and they said it could be replaced so do it, overrule the person who wants the painting to remain.
    Can we get the decision makers identity too?

  9. Kim

    Thank you Sherelle for standing up. Your article was well stated.

  10. Kevin McKeithen

    I believe this article brings up an issue that is overlooked within our society when it pertains to pieces of art that represent historical events. I feel some of us would rather protect the “feelings” of the artwork and what it represents rather than the individuals who view the artwork as offensive because it depicts their culture and history in a negative light. African Americans have contributed so much more to American history, yet a large portion of the historical art pieces that include African Americans show us in a position of indentured servitude or as many refer to as slavery. Although there are slight differences between indentured servitude and slavery, the point is that is the depicted act that my ancestors are portrayed as being a part of. I have nothing against history, but if we are to be historically accurate, my Caucasian brothers and sisters were also indentured servants. If there were more pieces of art that portrayed that imagery, would it still be considered just historical artwork or maybe offensive imagery that should be considered to be relocated into a more historically appropriate edifice like a musuem.

  11. Bill Williams Jr

    I am a 21 year old young African American male. I feel that although we have come a long way, we still have not reached the point where African Americans are treated with complete equality, meaning we are still recognized as sub-human from white racists’ perspective. That being said, a portrait that displays African American as such and that hangs in a public institution such as City Hall speaks volumes about how this city feels about African American citizens who pay taxes to this city. So, if this is not the City’s intention, how hard is it to remove it?

  12. Bill Williams Sr.

    I agree with Sherelle’s article. Enough said. No need for a meeting to decide whether to remove it. Just please remove the painting.

  13. Drew Williams

    I am a student in high school. I read Ms. Sherelle’s article. I agree with her and do not get why this is a problem/issue. It is simple. It offends African American residents in this city. So remove it! Problem/issue solved!

  14. Andy Baptist

    Sister sherelle,”And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee” Deuteronomy 28:37

  15. Martha

    There is another article about a hearing on this issue on April 28. Thanks to Debora Goldstein and Ruby McPherson for commenting in that other article with fairness sense. It sounds like people are close minded and not really hearing the request that is being made. Better leadership would have prevented things from getting this far. Faye Bowman for also posted about the hearing on her Facebook page. These people are trying to turn this into something it was not intended to be like a public lynching. No one is saying burn history. Why do these people feel it is only ok to display and trample on Black people? Let’s put pictures of the Holocaust, Japanese Concentration Camps, Indentured Servants and the like up as well if you really want to be honest about history. I personally don’t want to see anyone’s pain and I thank the Japanese and other cultures who have been forthright and supportive about issues. Thank you Mr. Velez and Mr. Welsh.

    http://www.pri.org/stories/2016-02-23/despite-their-history-japanese-americans-and-african-americans-are-working

  16. Martha Dumas

    Andy, I thought about what you wrote. Our ancestors were the backbone of this country. Remember the meek shall inherit the earth and the foolish things of the world will shame the wise. Their enemies will be their footstools. Let’s leave room for hearts to changed.

  17. Rose Anderson

    Thank you Sherelle. As the daughter of the first black fire chief in Norwalk and the first black nursing supervisor of Norwalk Hospital, it really disturbs me that we still have to fight for respect and common courtesty. It is 2016, we need to stop living in the past although we should never forget the past. It’s a new day, it’s a better day, although not perfect. We still have a long way to go. We are no longer slaves. We are fire chiefs, head nurses, doctors, lawyers, teachers and accountants. Maybe it’s time that we depicted positive pictures from today. May it’s time we stop offending people of color.

  18. Rose Anderson

    We talk to kids about bullies and understanding. It is
    amazing when the adult pots call the kettle black or white. It’s not about having too much time on ones hand but it’s about defining right and wrong. I teach my kids and discuss with my kids about our history and our heritage. However, I don’t need to throw it in their faces everyday. You never forget your history. You must know where you came from in order to know where you’re going. If your relatives were apart of the Holocaust would you want those pictures and images thrown in your face everyday? That would be mean and cruel. As a society its time move forward and stop being so close minded. As a christian woman I am not trying to hurt anyone or cause any type of pain. I am trying to encourage and lift people up no matter what the color of their skin is or what the heritage. Maybe it’s time that we depicted positive pictures from today. May it’s time we stop offending all people.

  19. Andy Baptist

    Martha Dumas Our People is the body of Christ, Christ did teach us “If ye love me, keep my commandments” John 14:15

  20. Ernie Dumas

    I support replacing the WPA mural that depicts Blacks
    in subservient roles. I support replacing it with a mural
    that represents blacks in Norwalk or in Connecticut or
    even having an art revival engaging young artists in
    Norwalk.

    Out of respect we have waited one year to bring this to
    the public. It was agreed it would be replaced, why are
    we now at the point of a hearing. Where is the respect
    of keeping one’s word? That is also at issue.

  21. Joyce Abate

    Like many of you have already stated, I do not profess to know what African Americans endured through their many years of suffering in our nation. However, I believe that Sherelle’s statements are seriously valid, and her point in having this mural removed is also valid. Why depict African Americans as they are in this mural? How would we all feel if we were displayed as such in a location where so many people pass through to view this mural? In removing the mural, we are not hiding a thing – what we would be doing is sending a message that we know what African Americans have endured in CT and in America, but we wish to portray a better message that should be in our hearts and minds today – that all are created equal and are viewed as equal – to show all cultures in a way that dignifies them. There is a simple solution to this – remove the mural, and replace it with another that is kind to all and is dignified to all. And let’s do it now.

  22. Lenore Jordan

    In light of Sherelle’s article, I reflect on my late husband’s Kern Jordan’s concerns. Every single time we would enter City Hall, he would stop and talk about the message this mural sent to him, to the point he has approached several elected officials many years ago to no avail. I am glad Sherelle and the many people are feeling some type of way and are speaking up. I say continue to “cry loud and spare not”.

  23. Diane C2

    To Sherelle, thank you for writing such a beautiful and thought-provoking piece. Your words bring emotion to life. I truly understand your position and completely agree.

    As to the mural, I say to city officials “take the mural down!”.

    Though perhaps not nearly as a serious an issue, it all reminds me of earlier years in corporate America when my company became intensely compliant with harassment and other “HR” issues, and the topic of sexual harassment and offensiveness was much debated. At last the conclusion was reached that if anyone was offended, than the act or comment or image was indeed offensive. And I immediately thought of how disgusted I was each time I made my way from garage to my office to see the hallways lined with bygone era of our company print ads, tantamount at that time to pin up girls!

    Sadly, I did not prevail in my quest to have the company remove some of the framed period advertisements from a time when women were depicted in what I considered provocative poses – pales in comparison to advertising today!

    After a walking tour of the great hallways of headquarters accompanied by VP of Human Resources and the Director of Facilities (both men), they concluded that the ads were not offensive to them and were instead a lovely and accurate representation of the company and a time long ago.

    C’est la vie. But some twenty years later, I still recall. And react.

  24. Michael Crafter

    As an African American who has spent many years working with Norwalk youth. I want all youth (especially) African American youth to have a positive outlook and vision for their future. There is plenty to educate and remind us of the past (slavery)we don’t need a mural in city hall to do that. Its time for are youth to start having positive images of prominent African American figures (past and present) such as doctors, lawyers, scientist, and so on.

  25. L. Williams

    Ms.Harris, thank you for bringing awareness to this issue and not letting it slide. As a fellow librarian, I appreciate and applaud you for providing outstanding context and references to your point. I agree, the painting should be removed. I pray that the City of Norwalk takes notice and does what is right.

  26. Dawn Maisha Omorodion

    Very well written. I believe that people have a right to own whatever suits their fancy for their private collections.I also believe that art should not be censored. However, in an ultra-public place such as City Hall the opinions and feelings of all who use the facility should by all means be respected.
    This painting could be appropriately housed in an alternate location.

  27. The Other Shoe

    Still waiting on Part 2 from Ms. Harris, or maybe she has nothing left to say. Mr. Dumas, perhaps you could enlighten us all regarding the broken promise that you refer to?

  28. Deidra Davis

    I’m glad Ms. Harris is intelligent enough NOT to be goaded into responding until she is ready. I’ve seen two tactics to get her to do so. From hearing her speak in public I know this is more about love for our ancestors than fighting with the likes of people, particularly those who don’t have the courage to respond in their own names. I support replacing the Steamboat Days on the Mississippi painting in City Hall. Again, Black people love their ancestors just like any other race. It is an ignorant piece to have there in 2016. They have just launched the new branding for the City of Norwalk using the different races here, but it is not an honest telling. The truth is that Blacks are not respected in this town as evidenced by having to have a hearing to take down the mural. There wasn’t a hearing to put it up. Why is there a hearing to take it down? They accuse Blacks of drawing attention to racism here. What to you call this hearing? How are you going to continue denying those who have called attention to Norwalk’s treatment of Blacks. Dropping money here are there and politically appointing people to boards to silence them is not a form of respect, but just another form of trying to control outcomes. Appoint people who really care about and can help you understand the Black race and replace that picture. I’ve heard that there are plenty of other pieces that can go in its place. The pictures of whites in City Hall have them on nice picnics, playing sports, doing nice things. Stop the nonsense and replace the painting or level the playing field.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link