Quantcast

Opinion: We Need the River Line

Do you wish Norwalk had more traffic or less? If your answer is the latter, we’re already in agreement: we need the River Line. Devised by volunteers at Sustainable Streets Norwalk, the River Line will ease congestion, invite prosperity, and improve public and environmental health for our city-on-the-sound and Wilton, too. But what is the River Line? What are its aims, what are the costs, and how would Norwalkers benefit? 

Along the Norwalk River, Metro-North operates a branch of its railroad services. Terminating in Danbury, the railroad is severely underutilized. Operating almost exclusively to shuttle unfortunate souls commuting into and out of New York, its frequency is laughable, and its stations are inaccessible to pedestrians. But these issues do not indicate redundancy, in fact the opposite is true. 

The tracks run past several destinations in the area that suffer from severe traffic congestion. Drivers, trapped in their cars, watch helplessly as trains glide serenely past their destinations. At the SoNo Collection, shoppers come from around the state to stimulate our economy and enrich our treasury. Regional job creators, like technology titan ASML, cite inaccessibility for employees as an impediment to staff retention. Increasing multimodal access through this commercial corridor is essential to our continued economic vitality, and we can do so by opening up these tracks to local service. 

This is where the River Line comes in. Along the railroad tracks of the Danbury Branch, new stations can be erected to service local stops, for example at the ASML Campus, Norwalk’s Wall Street, and the SoNo Collection. Local riders could step out directly at their destination, cutting commutes and easing headaches, while also expanding accessibility for seniors, teenagers, and the disabled. 

Readers may assume that these grand plans are just idle daydreaming. The challenges facing such a project must be substantial, insurmountable. “If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.” But what if I told you it was far cheaper and easier than you supposed? What if for 1/100th of the cost of the Route 7/15 interchange, we could have trains zipping up and down the River Line in two years? 

The Danbury line is currently supported by one single-track railway. While it would be challenging to run two services (The extant Danbury Line service and the new River Line) on this one track, it would not be impossible, nor prohibitively expensive. The construction of a passing siding near the Norwalk/Wilton border would allow Metro-North and River Line trains to operate every 20-30 minutes in both directions. CTDOT has already studied this and estimated the cost at around $10M. 

But what about the rolling stock? The Danbury Line is currently serviced by heavy, diesel-powered locomotives; not ideal for small-scale, localized service. But technological development begets novel solutions: new battery-electric trains can accelerate quickly and have a track record of functionality in Germany. What’s more, modern start-up culture offers an affordable option for local communities seeking rail expansion. Pop-Up Metro LLC, a railroad

development corporation, provides quick-build modular platforms and rolling stock on a lease-basis. This would mean low upfront capital costs, were Norwalk to want the River Line up-and-running quickly. 

While Pop-Up Metro offers speed and economy, other options remain. Metro-North could step in with their current rolling stock; battery-pack modifications to their existing commuter rail cars are astonishingly feasible. The regional rail behemoth could also electrify the entire length of the existing line, but this was deemed too expensive in 2016. While many options exist, the best means of activating the River Line is the simplest and cheapest: lease rolling stock and modular platforms from Pop-Up Metro and get trains rolling before the class of 2027 graduates. 

Some may argue that the River Line is unnecessary. Why implement a new rail service when Norwalk already offers bus service to the area? Firstly, trains are faster than buses, and are not subject to traffic backups. Train cars are more comfortable, quieter and safer than buses. But most importantly, the construction of rail indicates to job creators and housing developers that the service is permanent. With connections to current and upcoming residential development, the installation of the River Line would help accommodate the explosive demand for housing without overtaxing existing road infrastructure. 

Mayor Rilling has expressed support for making Norwalk the “Greenest City in Connecticut,” and we have made great progress! Our expansion of sidewalks and bike infrastructure, as well as Norwalk Transit District’s route reorganization, is proof. The River Line is a chance for Norwalk to spend a little to get a lot: more jobs, cleaner air, and less traffic. Throwing up a local-service train system in just a few years may seem fanciful. But as you have read, it is not only affordable and achievable but, given the opportunities it offers, indispensable.

Editor’s Note:This piece was mistakenly published under my name due to a WordPress autofill. The author is Matt Silber. I apologize for the mix-up. I was in shock from the passing of Council Member Greg Burnett. Thank you for your understanding.

Comments

13 responses to “Opinion: We Need the River Line”

  1. David Muccigrosso

    I would take this to work every single day.

    I have in fact ranted to my coworkers that it is downright bonkers that we don’t have this already.

  2. David Muccigrosso

    Meanwhile, the city’s spending $2.5M on… *checks notes* a running track?

  3. Paul Lanning

    You lost me at “unfortunate souls commuting into and out of New York.”

  4. Bryan Meek

    Bob duff and team just blew $20 million plus on the glover Ave station that no one uses. We could have reopened the Wall Street station, but DOT said it wasn’t necessary.

    Now read up on the $700 million 9 mile busway Bob duff and team built from New Britain to Hartford. They built on top of a railroad that requires $30 million per year subsidy because it doesn’t have the ridership they lied about in their projections.

    Besides this busway, There are 9 highways crisscrossing Hartford county. We have 2 in Fairfield County and produce over half of the state’s revenue.

    Did you know the Danbury line used to be electrified? The state purposefully ripped that out for the deisel trains we have today.

    I could go on, but until people wake up and understand just how much this city gets screwed the screwing will continue. Too many still fawn over the crumbs Duff brings back to this district. Sadly our infrastructure will continue to be less adequate and DOT will continue to do whatever it pleases to Norwalk as long as this regime that serves Hartford first rules us.

    1. Becca Stoll

      So are you in favor of the River Line, a comparatively cheap economic booster that could alleviate traffic problems, or not?

      1. Bryan Meek

        Yes, I’ve been vocal bout getting the Wall Street station reopened. Instead of something people would use, Bob Duff and team blew $20 million on the Glover Ave stop no one uses. Maybe because he’s still trying to get BLT’s (who owns Bob’s R/E firm) high rise apartments pushed through over there. Recall BLT pulled the application because the city wouldn’t pay for underground utilities. The city is also already on the hook for a major upgrade to the sewage collection point around the bend at the bottom of Glover. Recall the apartments up the hill where US surgical was were not supposed to add any impact to local infrastructure. The city is under a federal consent order to fix it. Guess who pays for that?

        Duff also gave away 5 acres of our riverfront land so that the line could store Danbury’s trains that could have been used for a train station for the mall.

        If people ever want to see real, meaningful urban planning and necessary improvements they will need to change course in political leadership. This OP is a great idea, but it will never happen because the special interests that own us and our politicians have different agendas.

  5. Thomas Blyth

    This would be a great improvement to the Danbury Branch. A useful rail shuttle that exists for the community it runs through instead of the nearest major city would be huge for Norwalk. More people on a train = less cars on the road = less traffic. That’s a win/win/win!

  6. Patrick Cooper

    The Wall Street Association – along with major Wall Street developer Jason Milligan, were very vocal proponents for the re-establishment of the Wall Street station – and the value it would create for the city. This was within the last 5 years. Timing is everything – and given the city at the time – specifically mayor Rilling & his consigliere Mario – were in a dispute with Mr. Milligan over the POKO development – Jason and the idea were all but ignored.

    Today – Jason and his firm appears to have mostly settled with the city, and the public comments have ceased, at least on NoN. Apparently he is listening to Attorney Blank – who knows a thing or two about how to navigate city hall.

    Yes – this would be a huge benefit to the city – but as Bryan Meek points out – often the most important issues are latent to the general public. Frankly – we would do better with a far greater increase to our ECS than any other CT-DOT or Metro-North excursions into Norwalk. When it comes to these issues – Norwalk does best as a 1-ball juggler. Stay focused on ECS – keep that pressure high. Or the ability to levy a municipal sales tax. Everything else is either crazy, or gravy.

    1. Paul Fox

      This is probably better thought of as a regional issue — this is something that could potentially benefit more than Norwalk. Of course the lack of county government makes this more challenging in CT than it would be in other places, but there are a lot of potential ways around this hurdle — it ultimately just takes enough will and popular support.

  7. Thomas Belmont

    The cost for an effective use is prohibitive. Reinventing the wheel is no solution. The traffic situation is due to the increase of apartment overbuilding. Under-designed utilities along with transportation problems are growing. Cities require experienced city engineers with logistic intentions rather than…opportunities.

    1. Paul Fox

      Not at all. The cost is a fraction of what’s being spent on rebuilding the Route 7/Merritt Pkwy interchange. The tracks are already usable, and several of the proposed stations used to exist.

      The problem is that the service model of the Danbury Line is stuck in the past, and doesn’t serve the needs of current residents.

  8. Anthony Pavia

    Wall Street Station should have been re activated – would have been a homerun for the area and probably the single biggest driver for redevleopment. Unforced error not pushing for it.

  9. Melissa Murray

    We absolutely need this. This is a win-win for everyone. Northern towns will be protected from traffic, and Wall Street merchants will have access to a new segment of customers while also protecting our neighborhoods from incoming traffic. This makes complete sense. Our corporations on Main Street will have more access to the pool of young professionals who want to live in SoNo but have no easy way to commute between SoNo and the Route 7 area. We need our leaders to get this done. I am so grateful that Mayor Rilling listened and supported this fantastic idea. We know this will take a few years to implement, so let’s get the ball rolling as soon as possible. Thank you, Sustainable Streets, for keeping this innovative idea alive.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link