Quantcast

Why we love to hate I-95

I-95 South, Exit 87. (Formulanone , Via Wikimedia Commons)

Someone recently described me as “the Lewis Black of transportation:” angry, cynical and sarcastic. That’s high praise, in my view. So imagine my surprise that when Black performed recently in Waterbury and New London he riffed on the highway we love to hate: I-95.

Jim Cameron is founder of the Commuter Action Group and advocates for Connecticut rail riders. He writes a weekly column called “Talking Transportation” for CT Mirror and other publications in the state. Read past columns by clicking on the photo. Contact Jim at CommuterActionGroup@gmail.com.

“I lived in Connecticut for five years (attending the Yale School of Drama),” he told the crowd. “There’s nothing more joyous than driving up I-95. Hooo! Literally, all they do is repair it. They’re never going to finish it. It’s like a state law… in order to get through Connecticut you must spend an hour in your car bitching and moaning. Now that there’s money for infrastructure, you can count on this going on for the next 100 years.”

See if this list captures the essence of your angst about Connecticut’s busiest highway:

TRAFFIC: Some 200,000 vehicles a day drive some of the 89 miles of I-95 in Connecticut. That’s double the original design capacity. No wonder the road always seems congested, also perhaps because we have…

TOO MANY EXITS: I-95 is supposed to be an interstate highway but ends up being a short cut for local traffic. According to the Connecticut Department of Transportation the average distance driven on I-95, including vehicles going from Florida to Maine, is just 11 miles. Why are there 93 exits in just 89 miles? On the New Jersey Turnpike there are only 18 exits over its 117-mile length.

TRUCKS: Oh, we love to hate them, don’t we? They clog and hog “our” road and are so heavy they’ve dug track-like ruts in the pavement, creating a kind of cruise control for unaware drivers. But remember… we put those trucks on the road through our voracious consumption and demand for ever-faster deliveries.

OPERATIONAL LANES: Ever notice those surprise “extra lanes” between some on-ramps and off-ramps, helping to merge traffic? They’re great… until some bozo from out of state gets in them and is surprised to find, always at the last minute, that they only run a few hundred yards and they have to merge back into the flow.

BROKEN STREET LIGHTS: The busiest sections of I-95 are supposed to be illuminated by overhead streetlights to increase safety. But do they work? Of course not. Are they ever fixed? Doesn’t seem so.

SERVICE AREAS: Local Connecticut drivers are smart enough not to buy gasoline on I-95: the prices on the highway are 20 to 30 cents higher than local gas stations. And as for food, did you know that one of the most expensive McDonalds in the U.S. is at the northbound service area in Darien where a Big Mac combo meal costs big bucks… $18?

NOT ENOUGH TROOPERS: For such a busy highway, there are only a handful of state troopers on patrol, coping with accidents, breakdowns and, as time allows, chasing after speeders. If we want to be safe, we need more officers enforcing the traffic rules.

What are your favorite gripes about I-95? Drop me a line and let me know what I missed. Meantime… happy motoring!

Comments

10 responses to “Why we love to hate I-95”

  1. Richard Miller

    Absolutely too many exits. Now the plan for the future in East Lyme and Old Lyme is to spend 29 million dollars to fix exits 71 and 72 in a couple of years. If the towns hadn’t created the mess with the Businesses located off Four Mile River Road the only thing necessary would be to close exit 71 permanently. Likewise close the North bound 75 entrance. Unfortunately they just built a huge Noble gas station there so that’s not happening. Why is exit 73 there. All those exits do is make it convenient to get around. In reality there should be Exit 69 in Old Lyme, Exit 72 Rocky Neck Connector and Exit 74. Exits 71,73 and the entrance off of 75 or all of 75 could be closed, and that’s just on a ten mile stretch.

  2. Kevin Poruban

    I’ve learned to live with the never-ending construction. I also agree there are too many exits. I also agree there are never enough troopers from New Haven to Greenwich, and I think they should go back to 2 officers per vehicle (for their own safety). However, my peeves are more driver related. Let’s see…tractor trailers and other towed trailers always travelling in the left lane who blow by you like you’re standing still (guess someone took down all the “No Trucks in the Left Lane” signs during COVID). Aggressive drivers using all 4 lanes (yes, I’m counting the breakdown lane) to weave in and out of traffic. All the paper license plates (which almost always seem to be from New Jersey). The impossible-to-see-through window tinting and dark plastic covers obscuring license plates. Those stupid (and illegal) oscillating brake lights. All the people replacing amber marker lights with red and blue LED lights to make you think they’re some sort emergency vehicle. And last, but not least – those obnoxious bright-white LED lights that are also for purpose of intimidation. What say you Gov. Lamont and Commissioner Higgins…?

  3. Bryan Meek

    The fact the original highway took 3 years to construct and it takes longer to do most exit ramps now is a living testament to the failures of a government that used to work for the people, but instead now works for special interests.

    1. David Muccigrosso

      You are aware that when the original highway was constructed, there… wasn’t a highway ALREADY THERE, with millions of cars traveling it every year… right?

      Kind of makes construction hard regardless of how corrupt anyone is.

      1. Bryan Meek

        Don’t confuse your lack of imagination for an engineering problem with basic solutions. NJ, FL, TX to name just a few who figured out how to expand interstates. NYC had millions of pedestrians and they managed to build a subway system. We’re spending 3x the national average and simply can’t afford the prevailing wage and regulations we have in place. It’s why we have the 3rd worst rated infrastructure in the country. We’re going to get a good local lesson on this dynamic when the new NHS starts up. Over time you will notice the other areas of the city that are crumbling because we simply can not afford the price tag of simple projects.

        1. David Muccigrosso

          I’m glad we agree that overregulation is the problem!

          So… which parts of Norwalk would you like to eminent-domain in order to solve our own engineering problems?

          Also, perhaps we should let those flood-zone regulations die in committee before they increase the cost of building around here.

          Same goes for zoning. Let’s let the free market build wherever it wants! Setback regulations are silly anyways. People know how to build things, just let them build.

          But wait a second… you opposed the rezone. Or maybe those weren’t the burdensome regulations you were thinking of? I’m open to being enlightened here. But let’s not pretend that overregulation is ONLY ever the ones that annoy YOU.

          1. Bryan Meek

            Once again, your imagination escapes you. Check out Spain and other countries in Europe, where they are tunneling like crazy because of the land constraints. It can be done. It just takes vision and leadership which right now is limited to removing redundant utility poles as if that’s gonna do something to help.

  4. Bryan Meek

    Whoever was in charge of the exit 9 and now 17 overpasses should be in charge. Instead they hired a lawyer from Norwalk as their assistant chief. A shiny example of why the state has the third worst rated infrastructure in the country. It’s about bureaucracy, not services.

  5. Ed Ryan

    If we get rid of the Jones act, that would take a lot of the truck traffic off of the road.

  6. BART PICCIRILLO

    It cost 10 times more to do highway project roadwork in the US compared to Europe. Why is that? They just announced a project to redo the I91-Rt15-I691 interchange at a cost of $500 Million dollars. That’s right. 1/2 BILLION !!!
    Why is that? To many regulations, to much union influence, and to much government period.
    This is welfare to the construction industry and DOT.

    When ST Gov says we cant fix it, because we don’t have money , it never gets done.
    When ST Gov has the money (like today) , they waste it on buses nobody rides, and trains nobody takes.

    This will never change. The Merritt Parkway is a parking lot. When its not, before 6AM or after 10PM, cars do 90mph in the right lane. No state troopers, anywhere. SP can’t chase these guys anyway and these guys know it.
    Good job defunding the police. Most of these nutty drivers are drinking NIPs or smoking illegal weed (because its so much cheaper). Did anyone notice the state collected $90M from NIP deposits over tow years ? (its really just a TAX since you cant redeem any of the money, just don’t use that word around election time). BUT…..That means the people bought 90 million in one year. That’s 250,000 NIPS being sold PER DAY and 80% of those are consumed right after purchase. Figure that one out Einstein!
    But that’s ok because all the money is going (to each town) towards picking up and recycling all those little NIP bottles on the side of the road right !? No.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link