Quantcast

Josh Elliott answers NancyOnNorwalk’s 2026 governor’s race questionnaire

NORWALK, Conn. — State Rep. Josh Elliott, a Democratic candidate for governor, returned NancyOnNorwalk‘s candidate questionnaire covering housing, education funding, utility rates, health insurance, and other issues important to Norwalk voters.

His answers are printed below in full, organized by topic.

Editor’s note: NancyOnNorwalk sent the same questionnaire to Elliott and his primary opponent, Gov. Ned Lamont, on the same day. Elliott’s answers are published first, because he returned his ahead of Lamont.

Housing

Under the 8-30g affordable housing statute, what specific changes would you make, and would they make it easier or harder for a town like Norwalk to reach its housing goals?

“I’d preserve the core mechanism but fix the ‘moratorium’ loophole that lets wealthy suburbs lock out affordable housing for years by approving a handful of units. I’d tighten moratorium eligibility and strengthen affordability deed restrictions so units stay affordable longer.”


Education funding

Norwalk’s Education Cost Sharing grant has not kept pace with enrollment and cost increases. Would you change the ECS formula, and if so, how would that change affect Norwalk specifically?

“I’d weigh ECS more heavily toward actual enrollment, poverty concentration, and English learner population, and end the practice of holding districts harmless at outdated funding floors that bear no relationship to current need.”

Connecticut has one of the highest per-pupil special education cost burdens in the country. What would you change about how the state reimburses towns for special education?

“I would have the state be fully responsible for funding special education costs, so municipalities aren’t forced to absorb enormous costs.”


State budget and taxes

Connecticut’s fiscal guardrails (the spending cap, bonding cap and volatility cap) are up for renewal. Would you extend them as written, modify them, or replace them?

“Modify, not extend as written. The spending cap has been used to block urgent investments while the state sits on surpluses. I’d restructure the volatility cap so revenue above the threshold can be actually used for long term spending, and build in emergency flexibility that doesn’t require a supermajority to access.”

Public Act 26-76 changed how towns can offer property tax relief. Should the state go further and cap or restructure municipal property taxes statewide, or should that stay a local decision?

“The state should set a baseline circuit breaker that applies statewide, fully funded by the state, so relief doesn’t depend on whether your town can afford to offer it. Beyond that, the structural fix is fully funding ECS and PILOT so towns aren’t forced to compensate on property taxes in the first place.”

Name a specific state contract, tax break, or spending line from the current budget that you would eliminate, not just “review.”

“The Eversource-friendly structure of the Public Benefits Charge as currently administered, specifically the portion that funds programs which should be line items in the state budget rather than hidden on your electric bill. Ratepayers are currently subsidizing things through their utility bills that should be funded transparently through appropriations, which obscures both the cost and the accountability.”


Utilities

Eversource and UI customers have seen sharp rate increases. What specific state action would you take to lower electric bills, and what tradeoffs or costs would your proposal involve?

“Eversource and UI have exclusive franchises to serve most of Connecticut. There’s no competition, no alternative, no accountability. We should open their franchise rights to review and create space for municipal utilities or a state-run option. This would lower rates for consumers, and give the public far more accountability over energy corporations.”


Transportation

Metro-North’s New Haven Line carries thousands of Fairfield County commuters daily. What level of state investment do you support for rail improvements over the next four years?

“I’d commit to a four-year capital plan that prioritizes reliability improvements, station upgrades, and frequency increases on the New Haven Line. Metro-North is the economic spine of Fairfield County and the state has chronically underinvested relative to the ridership it carries.”


Campaign finance

Name one donor, industry, or interest group whose financial support you would decline, and explain why.

“If I had to pick just one, it would be energy corporations. However, I’ve already committed to no corporate or PAC money from any industry and using the state’s clean elections program.”


Health care

Connecticut residents have filed a growing number of complaints against health insurers over denied claims and prescription costs. What specific changes to state law or regulation would you pursue to reduce claim denials and improve insurer accountability?

“I plan to create a new office of the Connecticut Healthcare Consumer Protection Agency, which would be a first of its kind that would have investigative authority, subpoena power, and the capacity to enforce action against hospital systems, insurance companies, drug manufacturers and PBMs that rip off patients in the name of profits. The agency would have rate review authority with the power to approve, modify, or reject proposed premium increases. Insurers whose rates are unreasonable will be required to justify those increases at public hearings.”


State workforce

State employee and teacher pension liabilities remain a long-term drag on the budget. Do you support any changes to benefits for future hires, and if so, what?

“I won’t cut defined benefits for current employees or retirees. That’s a promise made and I’ll honor it. The bigger fix is funding the obligation honestly every year, which I will continue to do.”


Government structure

What is the first structural change you would make inside state government during your first 100 days, and why?

“On Day One of my administration I will appoint a new Federal Response Coordinator within the Governor’s office to actually get ahead of what is coming down from the Federal Government. Our Medicaid recipients are in real danger of losing coverage if we continue down Ned Lamont’s ‘wait and see’ approach.”


Environment

Long Island Sound flooding and erosion increasingly affect Norwalk’s shoreline neighborhoods. What specific coastal resilience projects would you prioritize, and how would you fund them?

“Prioritize nature-based solutions like living shorelines, restored tidal wetlands, and green infrastructure. Fund it through a combination of DEEP capital grants, federal coastal resilience dollars, and a state green bond program.”


Transparency

Would you support requiring more disclosure from municipal boards and agencies under the Freedom of Information Act, given documented gaps in how some Connecticut towns interpret exemptions like personnel matters?

“Yes, I’d close the personnel exemption loophole that towns use to shield misconduct investigations, contract negotiations, and disciplinary records that the public has a clear interest in seeing.”


On changing his mind

What is one policy position you have changed in the last five years, and what changed your mind?

“Zoning and housing density. Early in my legislative career I was more deferential to municipal control over land use and more skeptical of state intervention in local zoning decisions. What changed my mind was the data. We are not building housing fast enough here in Connecticut to keep up with demand and it is causing our economy to be uncompetitive.”

Comments

One response to “Josh Elliott answers NancyOnNorwalk’s 2026 governor’s race questionnaire”

  1. Patrick Cooper

    A common refrain – non-partisan – is that “rules” were meant to be broken. That has now been adjusted to include “laws” – sadly. But there are universal truths – and that is – the law of physics always prevails.

    Which brings us to the topic of the Democratic party in Connecticut. One could argue – this is the case with virtually every state – and the dominant (ruling) political party. For most of my lifetime – CT has been dominated by this party – debate over why isn’t the point. From how the state administers voting, candidates, how the state legislatures work – what are their priorities – for as long as any can recall – they operate under the laws of centripetal force. Inward – center seeking – always party orthodoxy – ideology trumps facts. From the outside – no one can see any pressure to change.

    Every few years – the status quo get’s a challenge. Rarely is that challenge ever a threat to the incumbent’s – they have worked for years to prevent that. Just look at Norwalk. But when there are no dissenting or competing idea’s from the norm, the solutions are typically limited. They don’t serve all – specifically the minority party or in our case – 46% plus of the electorate. This builds frustration – which leads to anger. And then – physics take hold. The perspective from the inside is different. While still trapped inside this circle – the concept of a centrifugal force takes place. The pressure – to break free of the cycle. Those that do are typically banished from the club – another incentive to follow – not lead. This brings us to today.

    This push by Josh Elliot – is physics in motion. A challenge to the status quo, from the inside – not the “other side”. This is – I believe – healthy. But for this effort to actually deliver meaningful results – those affected by it – Democratic Party members – have to also be willing to break free of the cycle – to stop with go along – get along – and actually debate policy, process, and cost – using facts and benchmarks, not simply sharpening and retaining old party ideology.

    So what will it be Connecticut? Have you had enough? A simple look across the landscape of available economic metrics shows – we are not a healthy state, and in many cases – the residents are suffering due to the policies enacted – or not. The only way this state moves forward – right now, given the cards we are dealt – is for those in the electorate who support this party – to break free of the circle. To challenge the status quo you helped build. In short – to stop allowing those who have delivered these results to continue to stifle debate, simply to hold power. To say we need “course-correction” is an understatement. I hope Josh is able to successfully challenge the status quo – to spark heathy debate for residents to consider – without the typical punishment & banishment for trying.

Leave a Reply

Secret Link